You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@deltacloud.apache.org by "Tomas Sedovic (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/10/26 14:53:12 UTC
[jira] [Created] (DTACLOUD-354) Inconsistent collection format in
JSON responses
Tomas Sedovic created DTACLOUD-354:
--------------------------------------
Summary: Inconsistent collection format in JSON responses
Key: DTACLOUD-354
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DTACLOUD-354
Project: DeltaCloud
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Server
Reporter: Tomas Sedovic
Depending on the size of a Deltacloud resource collection (images, keys, actions, etc.) the JSON responses are not consistent.
0 images:
Expected: {"images": []}
Actual: {"images": null}
1 image:
Expected: {"images": [{"id": "img1", "name": "Fedora 19", ...}]}
Actual: {"images": {"image": {"id": "img1", "name": "Fedora 19", ...}}}
more than 1 image:
Expected: {"images": [{"id": "img1", "name": "Fedora 19", ...}, {"id": "img2", "name": "Fedora 18", ...}]}
Actual: {"images": {"image": [{"id": "img1", "name": "Fedora 19", ...}, {"id": "img2", "name": "Fedora 18", ...}]}}
(note that even when Deltacloud does return an array, the array is under "images"/"image" which isn't really ideal semantically)
The current situation make it difficult to write clients that consume the JSON API because each client has to check the response if it's null/hash/array before using the data.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira