You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Carl Marcum <cm...@apache.org> on 2012/01/13 00:54:40 UTC
Status of OOo NetBeans Plugin
Hi all,
I've seen mentioned in another thread, the OOo NetBeans plugin was to be
part of the SGA, but not yet available. Does anyone know the status of
the code, or when we should see it?
Best regards,
Carl
Re: Status of OOo NetBeans Plugin
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
Am Samstag, 14. Januar 2012 schrieb Andrew Rist <an...@oracle.com>:
> Sounds good - I'll wait for a day or so to see if there are any alternate
opinions, then go for it...
> A.
>
> On 1/13/2012 4:16 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On 01/13/2012 12:08 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>>>
>>> Where should we check it in? If there is a consensus on the location,
>>> I'll check it in and change the headers...
>>>
after the discussion the last days I am not sure if we should put it under
trunk or better besides trunk. People who want it check the sources
necessary to build the office only would checkout trunk. If we put it also
under trunk people would check these things too and would probably never
build it.
I am fine with devtools and the plugin already have the name
ooonetbeansintegration or so. I have to check it ...
Juergen
>>> A.
>>>
>>
>> The original discussion is here [1].
>>
>> I think the proposal is to start something beside 'trunk' like
'devtools' since it won't be included with OOo source.
>>
>> I think we should put it's own directory under 'devtools' like
'netbeans' since there will probably be similar plugins in the future like
'eclipse', etc.
>>
>> [1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201111.mbox/%3C4ED5FF8D.4050708%40googlemail.com%3E
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Carl
>>
>>> On 1/13/2012 12:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Carl,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for the reminder, I will work with Andrew on this and we can
>>>> hopefully provide the sources asap.
>>>>
>>>> But the plugin will need some maintenance work ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Juergen
>>>>
>>>> On 1/13/12 12:54 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> I've seen mentioned in another thread, the OOo NetBeans plugin was to
be
>>>>> part of the SGA, but not yet available. Does anyone know the status of
>>>>> the code, or when we should see it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Carl
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Andrew Rist | Interoperability Architect
> OracleCorporate Architecture Group
> Redwood Shores, CA | 650.506.9847
>
>
Re: Status of OOo NetBeans Plugin
Posted by Andrew Rist <an...@oracle.com>.
On 1/27/2012 8:42 AM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
> Am 27.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Andrew Rist:
>> On 1/26/2012 11:34 PM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> thank you for checking in the Netbeans Plugin.
>>>
>>> I'm just a little bit confused because the headers of the java files
>>> show now the Apache License 2.0 whereas a file called license.txt only
>>> mentions the use under LGPL 2.1
>>>
>>> Should this change or go away?
>>> Or do I miss something?
>> I believe that would be me who missed something.
>> Andrew
>>
>> (go ahead and change license.txt if you want - otherwise, it's in the
>> queue)
> done
> I copied the old copyright notice stating the copyright of Sun
>
> - Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
> + Copyright 2002,2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>
> Is this appropriate? Or should there be also Oracle as copyright holder?
Thanks for doing this Christoph - I've updated to Oracle.
A.
>
>>> Thank you
>>> Christoph
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 14.01.2012 02:15, schrieb Andrew Rist:
>>>> Sounds good - I'll wait for a day or so to see if there are any
>>>> alternate opinions, then go for it...
>>>> A.
>>>>
>>>> On 1/13/2012 4:16 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/13/2012 12:08 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>>>>>> Where should we check it in? If there is a consensus on the location,
>>>>>> I'll check it in and change the headers...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>
>>>>> The original discussion is here [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the proposal is to start something beside 'trunk' like
>>>>> 'devtools' since it won't be included with OOo source.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we should put it's own directory under 'devtools' like
>>>>> 'netbeans' since there will probably be similar plugins in the future
>>>>> like 'eclipse', etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201111.mbox/%3C4ED5FF8D.4050708%40googlemail.com%3E
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Carl
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/13/2012 12:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Carl,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks for the reminder, I will work with Andrew on this and we can
>>>>>>> hopefully provide the sources asap.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But the plugin will need some maintenance work ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Juergen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/13/12 12:54 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>> I've seen mentioned in another thread, the OOo NetBeans plugin was
>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>> part of the SGA, but not yet available. Does anyone know the
>>>>>>>> status of
>>>>>>>> the code, or when we should see it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Carl
>>
--
Andrew Rist | Interoperability Architect
OracleCorporate Architecture Group
Redwood Shores, CA | 650.506.9847
Re: Status of OOo NetBeans Plugin
Posted by Christoph Jopp <jo...@gmx.de>.
Am 27.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Andrew Rist:
> On 1/26/2012 11:34 PM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> thank you for checking in the Netbeans Plugin.
>>
>> I'm just a little bit confused because the headers of the java files
>> show now the Apache License 2.0 whereas a file called license.txt only
>> mentions the use under LGPL 2.1
>>
>> Should this change or go away?
>> Or do I miss something?
> I believe that would be me who missed something.
> Andrew
>
> (go ahead and change license.txt if you want - otherwise, it's in the
> queue)
done
I copied the old copyright notice stating the copyright of Sun
- Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
+ Copyright 2002,2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Is this appropriate? Or should there be also Oracle as copyright holder?
>>
>> Thank you
>> Christoph
>>
>>
>> Am 14.01.2012 02:15, schrieb Andrew Rist:
>>> Sounds good - I'll wait for a day or so to see if there are any
>>> alternate opinions, then go for it...
>>> A.
>>>
>>> On 1/13/2012 4:16 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>>
>>>> On 01/13/2012 12:08 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>>>>> Where should we check it in? If there is a consensus on the location,
>>>>> I'll check it in and change the headers...
>>>>>
>>>>> A.
>>>>>
>>>> The original discussion is here [1].
>>>>
>>>> I think the proposal is to start something beside 'trunk' like
>>>> 'devtools' since it won't be included with OOo source.
>>>>
>>>> I think we should put it's own directory under 'devtools' like
>>>> 'netbeans' since there will probably be similar plugins in the future
>>>> like 'eclipse', etc.
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201111.mbox/%3C4ED5FF8D.4050708%40googlemail.com%3E
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Carl
>>>>
>>>>> On 1/13/2012 12:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Carl,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks for the reminder, I will work with Andrew on this and we can
>>>>>> hopefully provide the sources asap.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But the plugin will need some maintenance work ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Juergen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/13/12 12:54 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>> I've seen mentioned in another thread, the OOo NetBeans plugin was
>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>> part of the SGA, but not yet available. Does anyone know the
>>>>>>> status of
>>>>>>> the code, or when we should see it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Carl
>
>
Re: Status of OOo NetBeans Plugin
Posted by Andrew Rist <an...@oracle.com>.
On 1/26/2012 11:34 PM, Christoph Jopp wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> thank you for checking in the Netbeans Plugin.
>
> I'm just a little bit confused because the headers of the java files
> show now the Apache License 2.0 whereas a file called license.txt only
> mentions the use under LGPL 2.1
>
> Should this change or go away?
> Or do I miss something?
I believe that would be me who missed something.
Andrew
(go ahead and change license.txt if you want - otherwise, it's in the queue)
>
> Thank you
> Christoph
>
>
> Am 14.01.2012 02:15, schrieb Andrew Rist:
>> Sounds good - I'll wait for a day or so to see if there are any
>> alternate opinions, then go for it...
>> A.
>>
>> On 1/13/2012 4:16 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> On 01/13/2012 12:08 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>>>> Where should we check it in? If there is a consensus on the location,
>>>> I'll check it in and change the headers...
>>>>
>>>> A.
>>>>
>>> The original discussion is here [1].
>>>
>>> I think the proposal is to start something beside 'trunk' like
>>> 'devtools' since it won't be included with OOo source.
>>>
>>> I think we should put it's own directory under 'devtools' like
>>> 'netbeans' since there will probably be similar plugins in the future
>>> like 'eclipse', etc.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201111.mbox/%3C4ED5FF8D.4050708%40googlemail.com%3E
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Carl
>>>
>>>> On 1/13/2012 12:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>>> Hi Carl,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for the reminder, I will work with Andrew on this and we can
>>>>> hopefully provide the sources asap.
>>>>>
>>>>> But the plugin will need some maintenance work ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Juergen
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/13/12 12:54 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> I've seen mentioned in another thread, the OOo NetBeans plugin was
>>>>>> to be
>>>>>> part of the SGA, but not yet available. Does anyone know the status of
>>>>>> the code, or when we should see it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Carl
Re: Status of OOo NetBeans Plugin
Posted by Christoph Jopp <jo...@gmx.de>.
Hi Andrew,
thank you for checking in the Netbeans Plugin.
I'm just a little bit confused because the headers of the java files
show now the Apache License 2.0 whereas a file called license.txt only
mentions the use under LGPL 2.1
Should this change or go away?
Or do I miss something?
Thank you
Christoph
Am 14.01.2012 02:15, schrieb Andrew Rist:
> Sounds good - I'll wait for a day or so to see if there are any
> alternate opinions, then go for it...
> A.
>
> On 1/13/2012 4:16 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On 01/13/2012 12:08 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>>> Where should we check it in? If there is a consensus on the location,
>>> I'll check it in and change the headers...
>>>
>>> A.
>>>
>>
>> The original discussion is here [1].
>>
>> I think the proposal is to start something beside 'trunk' like
>> 'devtools' since it won't be included with OOo source.
>>
>> I think we should put it's own directory under 'devtools' like
>> 'netbeans' since there will probably be similar plugins in the future
>> like 'eclipse', etc.
>>
>> [1]
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201111.mbox/%3C4ED5FF8D.4050708%40googlemail.com%3E
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Carl
>>
>>> On 1/13/2012 12:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>>> Hi Carl,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for the reminder, I will work with Andrew on this and we can
>>>> hopefully provide the sources asap.
>>>>
>>>> But the plugin will need some maintenance work ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Juergen
>>>>
>>>> On 1/13/12 12:54 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> I've seen mentioned in another thread, the OOo NetBeans plugin was
>>>>> to be
>>>>> part of the SGA, but not yet available. Does anyone know the status of
>>>>> the code, or when we should see it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Carl
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Status of OOo NetBeans Plugin
Posted by Andrew Rist <an...@oracle.com>.
Sounds good - I'll wait for a day or so to see if there are any
alternate opinions, then go for it...
A.
On 1/13/2012 4:16 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 01/13/2012 12:08 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>> Where should we check it in? If there is a consensus on the location,
>> I'll check it in and change the headers...
>>
>> A.
>>
>
> The original discussion is here [1].
>
> I think the proposal is to start something beside 'trunk' like
> 'devtools' since it won't be included with OOo source.
>
> I think we should put it's own directory under 'devtools' like
> 'netbeans' since there will probably be similar plugins in the future
> like 'eclipse', etc.
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201111.mbox/%3C4ED5FF8D.4050708%40googlemail.com%3E
>
> Thanks,
> Carl
>
>> On 1/13/2012 12:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hi Carl,
>>>
>>> thanks for the reminder, I will work with Andrew on this and we can
>>> hopefully provide the sources asap.
>>>
>>> But the plugin will need some maintenance work ;-)
>>>
>>> Juergen
>>>
>>> On 1/13/12 12:54 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> I've seen mentioned in another thread, the OOo NetBeans plugin was
>>>> to be
>>>> part of the SGA, but not yet available. Does anyone know the status of
>>>> the code, or when we should see it?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Carl
>>>
>>
>
--
Andrew Rist | Interoperability Architect
OracleCorporate Architecture Group
Redwood Shores, CA | 650.506.9847
Re: Status of OOo NetBeans Plugin
Posted by Carl Marcum <cm...@apache.org>.
Hi Andrew,
On 01/13/2012 12:08 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
> Where should we check it in? If there is a consensus on the location,
> I'll check it in and change the headers...
>
> A.
>
The original discussion is here [1].
I think the proposal is to start something beside 'trunk' like
'devtools' since it won't be included with OOo source.
I think we should put it's own directory under 'devtools' like
'netbeans' since there will probably be similar plugins in the future
like 'eclipse', etc.
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201111.mbox/%3C4ED5FF8D.4050708%40googlemail.com%3E
Thanks,
Carl
> On 1/13/2012 12:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi Carl,
>>
>> thanks for the reminder, I will work with Andrew on this and we can
>> hopefully provide the sources asap.
>>
>> But the plugin will need some maintenance work ;-)
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>> On 1/13/12 12:54 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I've seen mentioned in another thread, the OOo NetBeans plugin was to be
>>> part of the SGA, but not yet available. Does anyone know the status of
>>> the code, or when we should see it?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Carl
>>
>
Re: Status of OOo NetBeans Plugin
Posted by Andrew Rist <an...@oracle.com>.
Where should we check it in? If there is a consensus on the location,
I'll check it in and change the headers...
A.
On 1/13/2012 12:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> thanks for the reminder, I will work with Andrew on this and we can
> hopefully provide the sources asap.
>
> But the plugin will need some maintenance work ;-)
>
> Juergen
>
> On 1/13/12 12:54 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I've seen mentioned in another thread, the OOo NetBeans plugin was to be
>> part of the SGA, but not yet available. Does anyone know the status of
>> the code, or when we should see it?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Carl
>
--
Andrew Rist | Interoperability Architect
OracleCorporate Architecture Group
Redwood Shores, CA | 650.506.9847
Re: Status of OOo NetBeans Plugin
Posted by Chong Minsk Goh <cm...@gmail.com>.
I am also interested in the status of OOo plugin for Netbeans. Appreciate
if you could add me in the list too.
Best regards
CM
2012/1/13 Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>
> Hi Carl,
>
> thanks for the reminder, I will work with Andrew on this and we can
> hopefully provide the sources asap.
>
> But the plugin will need some maintenance work ;-)
>
> Juergen
>
>
> On 1/13/12 12:54 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I've seen mentioned in another thread, the OOo NetBeans plugin was to be
>> part of the SGA, but not yet available. Does anyone know the status of
>> the code, or when we should see it?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Carl
>>
>
>
Re: Status of OOo NetBeans Plugin
Posted by Carl Marcum <cm...@apache.org>.
On 01/13/2012 03:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> thanks for the reminder, I will work with Andrew on this and we can
> hopefully provide the sources asap.
>
> But the plugin will need some maintenance work ;-)
I haven't worked on it before, but I use it and would like to update it
to NB 7.1 and AOO SDK.
Best regards,
Carl
Re: Status of OOo NetBeans Plugin
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Carl,
thanks for the reminder, I will work with Andrew on this and we can
hopefully provide the sources asap.
But the plugin will need some maintenance work ;-)
Juergen
On 1/13/12 12:54 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've seen mentioned in another thread, the OOo NetBeans plugin was to be
> part of the SGA, but not yet available. Does anyone know the status of
> the code, or when we should see it?
>
> Best regards,
> Carl