You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@ofbiz.apache.org by er...@apache.org on 2012/04/20 23:35:38 UTC
svn commit: r1328518 -
/ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml
Author: erwan
Date: Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
New Revision: 1328518
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328518&view=rev
Log:
OFBIZ-4827 Release branch doesn't test in Jenkins
Modified:
ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml
Modified: ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml (original)
+++ ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
@@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ under the License.
<!-- load the naming (JNDI) server -->
<container name="naming-container" class="org.ofbiz.base.container.NamingServiceContainer">
- <property name="port" value="1099"/>
+ <property name="port" value="1100"/>
</container>
<!-- RMI Service Dispatcher -->
<container name="rmi-dispatcher" class="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.RmiServiceContainer">
<property name="bound-name" value="RMIDispatcher"/>
<property name="bound-host" value="127.0.0.1"/>
- <property name="bound-port" value="1099"/>
+ <property name="bound-port" value="1100"/>
<property name="delegator-name" value="test"/>
<property name="client-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.socket.ssl.SSLClientSocketFactory"/>
<property name="server-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.socket.ssl.SSLServerSocketFactory"/>
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ under the License.
<property name="maxSpareThreads" value="50"/>
<property name="maxThreads" value="200"/>
<property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
- <property name="port" value="8009"/>
+ <property name="port" value="8010"/>
<property name="tcpNoDelay" value="true"/>
<property name="soTimeout" value="60000"/>
<property name="tomcatAuthentication" value="true"/>
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ under the License.
<property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
<property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
<property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
- <property name="port" value="8080"/>
+ <property name="port" value="8081"/>
<property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
<property name="server" value=""/>
<property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ under the License.
<property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
<property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
<property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
- <property name="port" value="8443"/>
+ <property name="port" value="8444"/>
<property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
<property name="server" value=""/>
<property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
Re: svn commit: r1328518 - /ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml
Posted by Vikas Mayur <vi...@gmail.com>.
Not sure who you intend to send it but I believe 'argument' is the least little thing and OFBiz community can't afford it, so better apply some common sense while throwing away anything towards this community.
Regards
Vikas
On Apr 21, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>
> Maybe you should ask yourself why you got involved in this project, this
> community and why you were asked to join either the PMC or the group of
> committers and whether you are still adhering to those principles or
> guidelines. From the outside (meaning not being a PMC or a committer, but
> being part of this community) it often seems like your not.
>
> If you still feel you are then stay in touch with the community. If not,
> please state so and .....
Re: svn commit: r1328518 - /ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml
Posted by Pierre Smits <pi...@gmail.com>.
Scott,
I'm sorry to see that you, obviously, overlooked my first point and well meant advice to familiarize with the underlying issues before adding nothing sensible or new to this discussion...
That is, for sure, annoying.
Regards,
Pierre
Op Apr 21, 2012 om 14:42 heeft Scott Gray <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com> het volgende geschreven:
> I'm sorry if my first point and the use of capitals for emphasis offended you but I think you forget to actually respond to the main point, the configurability of a configuration file...
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> On 22/04/2012, at 12:32 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>
>> Scott,
>>
>> Please see my comments inline.
>>
>>
>> Op 21 april 2012 11:35 schreef Scott Gray <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com> het
>> volgende:
>>
>>> I haven't been following all these strange jenkins threads but I have two
>>> points:
>>>
>>
>> Maybe you should, so you know what the issue is about.
>>
>>
>>> 1. Don't be so aggressive, it'll get you nowhere and is annoying to read.
>>>
>>
>> I wasn't. Just defending the case. Let me apologize for everybody who makes
>> you feel annoyed.
>>
>>
>>> 2. This is a CONFIGURATION file, they exist so that if the provided setup
>>> doesn't suit your needs YOU CAN CHANGE IT.
>>>
>>
>> Using capitals is in terms of nettique is like shouting. It could be
>> perceived as agressive. One could feel annoyed!
>>
>>
>>>
>>> You simply don't change default settings within a release branch, it
>>> removes the stability that one should reasonably expect from a release.
>>> But for god's sake, these are configuration files, if it doesn't suit then
>>> change them to to your heart's content in your
>>
>>
>> Profanity isn't called for. Be civil!
>>
>>
>>> downloaded copy.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> On 21/04/2012, at 8:46 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe loss of common sense and growth of rigidness of convictions gets in
>>>> your way. I don't know....
>>>>
>>>> As one wants to have the test ports stay the same as production ports, so
>>>> that a specific group of end-users (namely developers and testers) can
>>> NOT
>>>> do testing in a CI way. Merely because it's a release. Because the new
>>> port
>>>> numbers might be in use.... And the old port numbers (read production
>>> port
>>>> numbers) are expected to be not?
>>>>
>>>> And saying: I wont deliver to JIRA, because that is NOT my way. So the
>>>> community can't test before code gets into the stream. Even when it is
>>>> asked for by the community....
>>>>
>>>> I could call that being stupid... It's surely not helping the product and
>>>> this community along.
>>>>
>>>> As is stated in ASF regulations and guidelines AND established in other
>>>> threads on this ML: End users should not have access development code or
>>>> test functionality in releases. For that there are other means (read
>>> SVN).
>>>> But hey, developers and testers are end users too. So treating all in the
>>>> same manner might be acceptible, when you're not thinking things through.
>>>>
>>>> Or as another stated: having a fix for missing help screens is not bug
>>>> fixing, but improving the release (to paraphrase) and is therefore not
>>>> going to be implemented in a release.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you should ask yourself why you got involved in this project, this
>>>> community and why you were asked to join either the PMC or the group of
>>>> committers and whether you are still adhering to those principles or
>>>> guidelines. From the outside (meaning not being a PMC or a committer, but
>>>> being part of this community) it often seems like your not.
>>>>
>>>> If you still feel you are then stay in touch with the community. If not,
>>>> please state so and .....
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Pierre
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Op 21 april 2012 09:35 schreef Jacques Le Roux <
>>> jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com
>>>>> het volgende:
>>>>
>>>>> Please Erwan revert: this is not a bug and should not be backported,
>>>>> unless there is a consensus in the community.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Author: erwan
>>>>>> Date: Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
>>>>>> New Revision: 1328518
>>>>>>
>>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1328518&view=rev<
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328518&view=rev>
>>>>>> Log:
>>>>>> OFBIZ-4827 Release branch doesn't test in Jenkins
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
>>>>>> containers.xml
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified: ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
>>>>>> containers.xml
>>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**
>>>>>> framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=**
>>>>>> 1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff<
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff
>>>>
>>>>>> ==============================**==============================**
>>>>>> ==================
>>>>>> ---
>>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
>>>>>> (original)
>>>>>> +++
>>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
>>>>>> Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
>>>>>> @@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ under the License.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <!-- load the naming (JNDI) server -->
>>>>>> <container name="naming-container"
>>> class="org.ofbiz.base.**container.*
>>>>>> *NamingServiceContainer">
>>>>>> - <property name="port" value="1099"/>
>>>>>> + <property name="port" value="1100"/>
>>>>>> </container>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <!-- RMI Service Dispatcher -->
>>>>>> <container name="rmi-dispatcher" class="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>>>>>> RmiServiceContainer">
>>>>>> <property name="bound-name" value="RMIDispatcher"/>
>>>>>> <property name="bound-host" value="127.0.0.1"/>
>>>>>> - <property name="bound-port" value="1099"/>
>>>>>> + <property name="bound-port" value="1100"/>
>>>>>> <property name="delegator-name" value="test"/>
>>>>>> <property name="client-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>>>>>> socket.ssl.**SSLClientSocketFactory"/>
>>>>>> <property name="server-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>>>>>> socket.ssl.**SSLServerSocketFactory"/>
>>>>>> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ under the License.
>>>>>> <property name="maxSpareThreads" value="50"/>
>>>>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="200"/>
>>>>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>>>>>> - <property name="port" value="8009"/>
>>>>>> + <property name="port" value="8010"/>
>>>>>> <property name="tcpNoDelay" value="true"/>
>>>>>> <property name="soTimeout" value="60000"/>
>>>>>> <property name="tomcatAuthentication" value="true"/>
>>>>>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ under the License.
>>>>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
>>>>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>>>>>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
>>>>>> - <property name="port" value="8080"/>
>>>>>> + <property name="port" value="8081"/>
>>>>>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
>>>>>> <property name="server" value=""/>
>>>>>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
>>>>>> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ under the License.
>>>>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
>>>>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>>>>>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
>>>>>> - <property name="port" value="8443"/>
>>>>>> + <property name="port" value="8444"/>
>>>>>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
>>>>>> <property name="server" value=""/>
>>>>>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: svn commit: r1328518 - /ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml
Posted by Scott Gray <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
I'm sorry if my first point and the use of capitals for emphasis offended you but I think you forget to actually respond to the main point, the configurability of a configuration file...
Regards
Scott
On 22/04/2012, at 12:32 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Scott,
>
> Please see my comments inline.
>
>
> Op 21 april 2012 11:35 schreef Scott Gray <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com> het
> volgende:
>
>> I haven't been following all these strange jenkins threads but I have two
>> points:
>>
>
> Maybe you should, so you know what the issue is about.
>
>
>> 1. Don't be so aggressive, it'll get you nowhere and is annoying to read.
>>
>
> I wasn't. Just defending the case. Let me apologize for everybody who makes
> you feel annoyed.
>
>
>> 2. This is a CONFIGURATION file, they exist so that if the provided setup
>> doesn't suit your needs YOU CAN CHANGE IT.
>>
>
> Using capitals is in terms of nettique is like shouting. It could be
> perceived as agressive. One could feel annoyed!
>
>
>>
>> You simply don't change default settings within a release branch, it
>> removes the stability that one should reasonably expect from a release.
>> But for god's sake, these are configuration files, if it doesn't suit then
>> change them to to your heart's content in your
>
>
> Profanity isn't called for. Be civil!
>
>
>> downloaded copy.
>>
>> Regards
>> Scott
>>
>> On 21/04/2012, at 8:46 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe loss of common sense and growth of rigidness of convictions gets in
>>> your way. I don't know....
>>>
>>> As one wants to have the test ports stay the same as production ports, so
>>> that a specific group of end-users (namely developers and testers) can
>> NOT
>>> do testing in a CI way. Merely because it's a release. Because the new
>> port
>>> numbers might be in use.... And the old port numbers (read production
>> port
>>> numbers) are expected to be not?
>>>
>>> And saying: I wont deliver to JIRA, because that is NOT my way. So the
>>> community can't test before code gets into the stream. Even when it is
>>> asked for by the community....
>>>
>>> I could call that being stupid... It's surely not helping the product and
>>> this community along.
>>>
>>> As is stated in ASF regulations and guidelines AND established in other
>>> threads on this ML: End users should not have access development code or
>>> test functionality in releases. For that there are other means (read
>> SVN).
>>> But hey, developers and testers are end users too. So treating all in the
>>> same manner might be acceptible, when you're not thinking things through.
>>>
>>> Or as another stated: having a fix for missing help screens is not bug
>>> fixing, but improving the release (to paraphrase) and is therefore not
>>> going to be implemented in a release.
>>>
>>> Maybe you should ask yourself why you got involved in this project, this
>>> community and why you were asked to join either the PMC or the group of
>>> committers and whether you are still adhering to those principles or
>>> guidelines. From the outside (meaning not being a PMC or a committer, but
>>> being part of this community) it often seems like your not.
>>>
>>> If you still feel you are then stay in touch with the community. If not,
>>> please state so and .....
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Pierre
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Op 21 april 2012 09:35 schreef Jacques Le Roux <
>> jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com
>>>> het volgende:
>>>
>>>> Please Erwan revert: this is not a bug and should not be backported,
>>>> unless there is a consensus in the community.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Author: erwan
>>>>> Date: Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
>>>>> New Revision: 1328518
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1328518&view=rev<
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328518&view=rev>
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> OFBIZ-4827 Release branch doesn't test in Jenkins
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
>>>>> containers.xml
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
>>>>> containers.xml
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**
>>>>> framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=**
>>>>> 1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff<
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff
>>>
>>>>> ==============================**==============================**
>>>>> ==================
>>>>> ---
>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
>>>>> (original)
>>>>> +++
>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
>>>>> Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
>>>>> @@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ under the License.
>>>>>
>>>>> <!-- load the naming (JNDI) server -->
>>>>> <container name="naming-container"
>> class="org.ofbiz.base.**container.*
>>>>> *NamingServiceContainer">
>>>>> - <property name="port" value="1099"/>
>>>>> + <property name="port" value="1100"/>
>>>>> </container>
>>>>>
>>>>> <!-- RMI Service Dispatcher -->
>>>>> <container name="rmi-dispatcher" class="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>>>>> RmiServiceContainer">
>>>>> <property name="bound-name" value="RMIDispatcher"/>
>>>>> <property name="bound-host" value="127.0.0.1"/>
>>>>> - <property name="bound-port" value="1099"/>
>>>>> + <property name="bound-port" value="1100"/>
>>>>> <property name="delegator-name" value="test"/>
>>>>> <property name="client-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>>>>> socket.ssl.**SSLClientSocketFactory"/>
>>>>> <property name="server-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>>>>> socket.ssl.**SSLServerSocketFactory"/>
>>>>> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ under the License.
>>>>> <property name="maxSpareThreads" value="50"/>
>>>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="200"/>
>>>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>>>>> - <property name="port" value="8009"/>
>>>>> + <property name="port" value="8010"/>
>>>>> <property name="tcpNoDelay" value="true"/>
>>>>> <property name="soTimeout" value="60000"/>
>>>>> <property name="tomcatAuthentication" value="true"/>
>>>>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ under the License.
>>>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
>>>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>>>>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
>>>>> - <property name="port" value="8080"/>
>>>>> + <property name="port" value="8081"/>
>>>>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
>>>>> <property name="server" value=""/>
>>>>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
>>>>> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ under the License.
>>>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
>>>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>>>>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
>>>>> - <property name="port" value="8443"/>
>>>>> + <property name="port" value="8444"/>
>>>>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
>>>>> <property name="server" value=""/>
>>>>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
Re: svn commit: r1328518 - /ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml
Posted by Pierre Smits <pi...@gmail.com>.
Scott,
Please see my comments inline.
Op 21 april 2012 11:35 schreef Scott Gray <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com> het
volgende:
> I haven't been following all these strange jenkins threads but I have two
> points:
>
Maybe you should, so you know what the issue is about.
> 1. Don't be so aggressive, it'll get you nowhere and is annoying to read.
>
I wasn't. Just defending the case. Let me apologize for everybody who makes
you feel annoyed.
> 2. This is a CONFIGURATION file, they exist so that if the provided setup
> doesn't suit your needs YOU CAN CHANGE IT.
>
Using capitals is in terms of nettique is like shouting. It could be
perceived as agressive. One could feel annoyed!
>
> You simply don't change default settings within a release branch, it
> removes the stability that one should reasonably expect from a release.
> But for god's sake, these are configuration files, if it doesn't suit then
> change them to to your heart's content in your
Profanity isn't called for. Be civil!
> downloaded copy.
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> On 21/04/2012, at 8:46 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>
> > Maybe loss of common sense and growth of rigidness of convictions gets in
> > your way. I don't know....
> >
> > As one wants to have the test ports stay the same as production ports, so
> > that a specific group of end-users (namely developers and testers) can
> NOT
> > do testing in a CI way. Merely because it's a release. Because the new
> port
> > numbers might be in use.... And the old port numbers (read production
> port
> > numbers) are expected to be not?
> >
> > And saying: I wont deliver to JIRA, because that is NOT my way. So the
> > community can't test before code gets into the stream. Even when it is
> > asked for by the community....
> >
> > I could call that being stupid... It's surely not helping the product and
> > this community along.
> >
> > As is stated in ASF regulations and guidelines AND established in other
> > threads on this ML: End users should not have access development code or
> > test functionality in releases. For that there are other means (read
> SVN).
> > But hey, developers and testers are end users too. So treating all in the
> > same manner might be acceptible, when you're not thinking things through.
> >
> > Or as another stated: having a fix for missing help screens is not bug
> > fixing, but improving the release (to paraphrase) and is therefore not
> > going to be implemented in a release.
> >
> > Maybe you should ask yourself why you got involved in this project, this
> > community and why you were asked to join either the PMC or the group of
> > committers and whether you are still adhering to those principles or
> > guidelines. From the outside (meaning not being a PMC or a committer, but
> > being part of this community) it often seems like your not.
> >
> > If you still feel you are then stay in touch with the community. If not,
> > please state so and .....
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Pierre
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Op 21 april 2012 09:35 schreef Jacques Le Roux <
> jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com
> >> het volgende:
> >
> >> Please Erwan revert: this is not a bug and should not be backported,
> >> unless there is a consensus in the community.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Jacques
> >>
> >>
> >> Author: erwan
> >>> Date: Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
> >>> New Revision: 1328518
> >>>
> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1328518&view=rev<
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328518&view=rev>
> >>> Log:
> >>> OFBIZ-4827 Release branch doesn't test in Jenkins
> >>>
> >>> Modified:
> >>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
> >>> containers.xml
> >>>
> >>> Modified: ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
> >>> containers.xml
> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**
> >>> framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=**
> >>> 1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff<
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff
> >
> >>> ==============================**==============================**
> >>> ==================
> >>> ---
> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
> >>> (original)
> >>> +++
> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
> >>> Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
> >>> @@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ under the License.
> >>>
> >>> <!-- load the naming (JNDI) server -->
> >>> <container name="naming-container"
> class="org.ofbiz.base.**container.*
> >>> *NamingServiceContainer">
> >>> - <property name="port" value="1099"/>
> >>> + <property name="port" value="1100"/>
> >>> </container>
> >>>
> >>> <!-- RMI Service Dispatcher -->
> >>> <container name="rmi-dispatcher" class="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
> >>> RmiServiceContainer">
> >>> <property name="bound-name" value="RMIDispatcher"/>
> >>> <property name="bound-host" value="127.0.0.1"/>
> >>> - <property name="bound-port" value="1099"/>
> >>> + <property name="bound-port" value="1100"/>
> >>> <property name="delegator-name" value="test"/>
> >>> <property name="client-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
> >>> socket.ssl.**SSLClientSocketFactory"/>
> >>> <property name="server-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
> >>> socket.ssl.**SSLServerSocketFactory"/>
> >>> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ under the License.
> >>> <property name="maxSpareThreads" value="50"/>
> >>> <property name="maxThreads" value="200"/>
> >>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
> >>> - <property name="port" value="8009"/>
> >>> + <property name="port" value="8010"/>
> >>> <property name="tcpNoDelay" value="true"/>
> >>> <property name="soTimeout" value="60000"/>
> >>> <property name="tomcatAuthentication" value="true"/>
> >>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ under the License.
> >>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
> >>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
> >>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
> >>> - <property name="port" value="8080"/>
> >>> + <property name="port" value="8081"/>
> >>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
> >>> <property name="server" value=""/>
> >>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
> >>> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ under the License.
> >>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
> >>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
> >>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
> >>> - <property name="port" value="8443"/>
> >>> + <property name="port" value="8444"/>
> >>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
> >>> <property name="server" value=""/>
> >>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
>
Re: svn commit: r1328518 - /ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml
Posted by Scott Gray <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
I haven't been following all these strange jenkins threads but I have two points:
1. Don't be so aggressive, it'll get you nowhere and is annoying to read.
2. This is a CONFIGURATION file, they exist so that if the provided setup doesn't suit your needs YOU CAN CHANGE IT.
You simply don't change default settings within a release branch, it removes the stability that one should reasonably expect from a release. But for god's sake, these are configuration files, if it doesn't suit then change them to to your heart's content in your downloaded copy.
Regards
Scott
On 21/04/2012, at 8:46 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Maybe loss of common sense and growth of rigidness of convictions gets in
> your way. I don't know....
>
> As one wants to have the test ports stay the same as production ports, so
> that a specific group of end-users (namely developers and testers) can NOT
> do testing in a CI way. Merely because it's a release. Because the new port
> numbers might be in use.... And the old port numbers (read production port
> numbers) are expected to be not?
>
> And saying: I wont deliver to JIRA, because that is NOT my way. So the
> community can't test before code gets into the stream. Even when it is
> asked for by the community....
>
> I could call that being stupid... It's surely not helping the product and
> this community along.
>
> As is stated in ASF regulations and guidelines AND established in other
> threads on this ML: End users should not have access development code or
> test functionality in releases. For that there are other means (read SVN).
> But hey, developers and testers are end users too. So treating all in the
> same manner might be acceptible, when you're not thinking things through.
>
> Or as another stated: having a fix for missing help screens is not bug
> fixing, but improving the release (to paraphrase) and is therefore not
> going to be implemented in a release.
>
> Maybe you should ask yourself why you got involved in this project, this
> community and why you were asked to join either the PMC or the group of
> committers and whether you are still adhering to those principles or
> guidelines. From the outside (meaning not being a PMC or a committer, but
> being part of this community) it often seems like your not.
>
> If you still feel you are then stay in touch with the community. If not,
> please state so and .....
>
> Regards,
>
> Pierre
>
>
>
>
> Op 21 april 2012 09:35 schreef Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com
>> het volgende:
>
>> Please Erwan revert: this is not a bug and should not be backported,
>> unless there is a consensus in the community.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>> Author: erwan
>>> Date: Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
>>> New Revision: 1328518
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1328518&view=rev<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328518&view=rev>
>>> Log:
>>> OFBIZ-4827 Release branch doesn't test in Jenkins
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
>>> containers.xml
>>>
>>> Modified: ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
>>> containers.xml
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**
>>> framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=**
>>> 1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff>
>>> ==============================**==============================**
>>> ==================
>>> --- ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
>>> (original)
>>> +++ ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
>>> Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
>>> @@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ under the License.
>>>
>>> <!-- load the naming (JNDI) server -->
>>> <container name="naming-container" class="org.ofbiz.base.**container.*
>>> *NamingServiceContainer">
>>> - <property name="port" value="1099"/>
>>> + <property name="port" value="1100"/>
>>> </container>
>>>
>>> <!-- RMI Service Dispatcher -->
>>> <container name="rmi-dispatcher" class="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>>> RmiServiceContainer">
>>> <property name="bound-name" value="RMIDispatcher"/>
>>> <property name="bound-host" value="127.0.0.1"/>
>>> - <property name="bound-port" value="1099"/>
>>> + <property name="bound-port" value="1100"/>
>>> <property name="delegator-name" value="test"/>
>>> <property name="client-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>>> socket.ssl.**SSLClientSocketFactory"/>
>>> <property name="server-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>>> socket.ssl.**SSLServerSocketFactory"/>
>>> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ under the License.
>>> <property name="maxSpareThreads" value="50"/>
>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="200"/>
>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>>> - <property name="port" value="8009"/>
>>> + <property name="port" value="8010"/>
>>> <property name="tcpNoDelay" value="true"/>
>>> <property name="soTimeout" value="60000"/>
>>> <property name="tomcatAuthentication" value="true"/>
>>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ under the License.
>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
>>> - <property name="port" value="8080"/>
>>> + <property name="port" value="8081"/>
>>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
>>> <property name="server" value=""/>
>>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
>>> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ under the License.
>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
>>> - <property name="port" value="8443"/>
>>> + <property name="port" value="8444"/>
>>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
>>> <property name="server" value=""/>
>>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: svn commit: r1328518 - /ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
From: "Pierre Smits" <pi...@gmail.com>
> Maybe loss of common sense and growth of rigidness of convictions gets in
> your way. I don't know....
Adam explained why, see his comment in the other thread
> As one wants to have the test ports stay the same as production ports, so
> that a specific group of end-users (namely developers and testers) can NOT
> do testing in a CI way. Merely because it's a release. Because the new port
> numbers might be in use.... And the old port numbers (read production port
> numbers) are expected to be not?
We did in trunk, people which are using release can do that in a snap if they need it.
I don't see any reasons to arg here and go agains the rule: *if it's not broken don't fix it*
> And saying: I wont deliver to JIRA, because that is NOT my way. So the
> community can't test before code gets into the stream. Even when it is
> asked for by the community....
This is Adam, not me. I must say the way Adam works (svn commit bursts) is not perfect.
That's the problem with Git users. See other threads in ASF as well...
> I could call that being stupid... It's surely not helping the product and
> this community along.
>
> As is stated in ASF regulations and guidelines AND established in other
> threads on this ML: End users should not have access development code or
> test functionality in releases. For that there are other means (read SVN).
> But hey, developers and testers are end users too. So treating all in the
> same manner might be acceptible, when you're not thinking things through.
>
> Or as another stated: having a fix for missing help screens is not bug
> fixing, but improving the release (to paraphrase) and is therefore not
> going to be implemented in a release.
That was me. As is said this (and other moot cases) can be discussed with the community.
If we find a consensus I'm personnaly not against it. This has already been done in the past...
DURA LEX, SED LEX
Jacques
> Maybe you should ask yourself why you got involved in this project, this
> community and why you were asked to join either the PMC or the group of
> committers and whether you are still adhering to those principles or
> guidelines. From the outside (meaning not being a PMC or a committer, but
> being part of this community) it often seems like your not.
>
> If you still feel you are then stay in touch with the community. If not,
> please state so and .....
>
> Regards,
>
> Pierre
>
>
>
>
> Op 21 april 2012 09:35 schreef Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com
>> het volgende:
>
>> Please Erwan revert: this is not a bug and should not be backported,
>> unless there is a consensus in the community.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>> Author: erwan
>>> Date: Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
>>> New Revision: 1328518
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1328518&view=rev<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328518&view=rev>
>>> Log:
>>> OFBIZ-4827 Release branch doesn't test in Jenkins
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
>>> containers.xml
>>>
>>> Modified: ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
>>> containers.xml
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**
>>> framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=**
>>> 1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff>
>>> ==============================**==============================**
>>> ==================
>>> --- ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
>>> (original)
>>> +++ ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
>>> Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
>>> @@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ under the License.
>>>
>>> <!-- load the naming (JNDI) server -->
>>> <container name="naming-container" class="org.ofbiz.base.**container.*
>>> *NamingServiceContainer">
>>> - <property name="port" value="1099"/>
>>> + <property name="port" value="1100"/>
>>> </container>
>>>
>>> <!-- RMI Service Dispatcher -->
>>> <container name="rmi-dispatcher" class="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>>> RmiServiceContainer">
>>> <property name="bound-name" value="RMIDispatcher"/>
>>> <property name="bound-host" value="127.0.0.1"/>
>>> - <property name="bound-port" value="1099"/>
>>> + <property name="bound-port" value="1100"/>
>>> <property name="delegator-name" value="test"/>
>>> <property name="client-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>>> socket.ssl.**SSLClientSocketFactory"/>
>>> <property name="server-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>>> socket.ssl.**SSLServerSocketFactory"/>
>>> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ under the License.
>>> <property name="maxSpareThreads" value="50"/>
>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="200"/>
>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>>> - <property name="port" value="8009"/>
>>> + <property name="port" value="8010"/>
>>> <property name="tcpNoDelay" value="true"/>
>>> <property name="soTimeout" value="60000"/>
>>> <property name="tomcatAuthentication" value="true"/>
>>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ under the License.
>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
>>> - <property name="port" value="8080"/>
>>> + <property name="port" value="8081"/>
>>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
>>> <property name="server" value=""/>
>>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
>>> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ under the License.
>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
>>> - <property name="port" value="8443"/>
>>> + <property name="port" value="8444"/>
>>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
>>> <property name="server" value=""/>
>>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: svn commit: r1328518 - /ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml
Posted by Pierre Smits <pi...@gmail.com>.
Maybe loss of common sense and growth of rigidness of convictions gets in
your way. I don't know....
As one wants to have the test ports stay the same as production ports, so
that a specific group of end-users (namely developers and testers) can NOT
do testing in a CI way. Merely because it's a release. Because the new port
numbers might be in use.... And the old port numbers (read production port
numbers) are expected to be not?
And saying: I wont deliver to JIRA, because that is NOT my way. So the
community can't test before code gets into the stream. Even when it is
asked for by the community....
I could call that being stupid... It's surely not helping the product and
this community along.
As is stated in ASF regulations and guidelines AND established in other
threads on this ML: End users should not have access development code or
test functionality in releases. For that there are other means (read SVN).
But hey, developers and testers are end users too. So treating all in the
same manner might be acceptible, when you're not thinking things through.
Or as another stated: having a fix for missing help screens is not bug
fixing, but improving the release (to paraphrase) and is therefore not
going to be implemented in a release.
Maybe you should ask yourself why you got involved in this project, this
community and why you were asked to join either the PMC or the group of
committers and whether you are still adhering to those principles or
guidelines. From the outside (meaning not being a PMC or a committer, but
being part of this community) it often seems like your not.
If you still feel you are then stay in touch with the community. If not,
please state so and .....
Regards,
Pierre
Op 21 april 2012 09:35 schreef Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com
> het volgende:
> Please Erwan revert: this is not a bug and should not be backported,
> unless there is a consensus in the community.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Author: erwan
>> Date: Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
>> New Revision: 1328518
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1328518&view=rev<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328518&view=rev>
>> Log:
>> OFBIZ-4827 Release branch doesn't test in Jenkins
>>
>> Modified:
>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
>> containers.xml
>>
>> Modified: ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
>> containers.xml
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**
>> framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=**
>> 1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff>
>> ==============================**==============================**
>> ==================
>> --- ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
>> (original)
>> +++ ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
>> Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
>> @@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ under the License.
>>
>> <!-- load the naming (JNDI) server -->
>> <container name="naming-container" class="org.ofbiz.base.**container.*
>> *NamingServiceContainer">
>> - <property name="port" value="1099"/>
>> + <property name="port" value="1100"/>
>> </container>
>>
>> <!-- RMI Service Dispatcher -->
>> <container name="rmi-dispatcher" class="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>> RmiServiceContainer">
>> <property name="bound-name" value="RMIDispatcher"/>
>> <property name="bound-host" value="127.0.0.1"/>
>> - <property name="bound-port" value="1099"/>
>> + <property name="bound-port" value="1100"/>
>> <property name="delegator-name" value="test"/>
>> <property name="client-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>> socket.ssl.**SSLClientSocketFactory"/>
>> <property name="server-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>> socket.ssl.**SSLServerSocketFactory"/>
>> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ under the License.
>> <property name="maxSpareThreads" value="50"/>
>> <property name="maxThreads" value="200"/>
>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>> - <property name="port" value="8009"/>
>> + <property name="port" value="8010"/>
>> <property name="tcpNoDelay" value="true"/>
>> <property name="soTimeout" value="60000"/>
>> <property name="tomcatAuthentication" value="true"/>
>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ under the License.
>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
>> - <property name="port" value="8080"/>
>> + <property name="port" value="8081"/>
>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
>> <property name="server" value=""/>
>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
>> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ under the License.
>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
>> - <property name="port" value="8443"/>
>> + <property name="port" value="8444"/>
>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
>> <property name="server" value=""/>
>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
>>
>>
>>
Re: svn commit: r1328518 - /ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml
Posted by Erwan de FERRIERES <er...@nereide.fr>.
Le 21/04/2012 09:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> Please Erwan revert: this is not a bug and should not be backported,
> unless there is a consensus in the community.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
done.
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
Re: svn commit: r1328518 - /ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Please Erwan revert: this is not a bug and should not be backported, unless there is a consensus in the community.
Thanks
Jacques
> Author: erwan
> Date: Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
> New Revision: 1328518
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328518&view=rev
> Log:
> OFBIZ-4827 Release branch doesn't test in Jenkins
>
> Modified:
> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml
>
> Modified: ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml (original)
> +++ ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
> @@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ under the License.
>
> <!-- load the naming (JNDI) server -->
> <container name="naming-container" class="org.ofbiz.base.container.NamingServiceContainer">
> - <property name="port" value="1099"/>
> + <property name="port" value="1100"/>
> </container>
>
> <!-- RMI Service Dispatcher -->
> <container name="rmi-dispatcher" class="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.RmiServiceContainer">
> <property name="bound-name" value="RMIDispatcher"/>
> <property name="bound-host" value="127.0.0.1"/>
> - <property name="bound-port" value="1099"/>
> + <property name="bound-port" value="1100"/>
> <property name="delegator-name" value="test"/>
> <property name="client-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.socket.ssl.SSLClientSocketFactory"/>
> <property name="server-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.socket.ssl.SSLServerSocketFactory"/>
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ under the License.
> <property name="maxSpareThreads" value="50"/>
> <property name="maxThreads" value="200"/>
> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
> - <property name="port" value="8009"/>
> + <property name="port" value="8010"/>
> <property name="tcpNoDelay" value="true"/>
> <property name="soTimeout" value="60000"/>
> <property name="tomcatAuthentication" value="true"/>
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ under the License.
> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
> - <property name="port" value="8080"/>
> + <property name="port" value="8081"/>
> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
> <property name="server" value=""/>
> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ under the License.
> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
> - <property name="port" value="8443"/>
> + <property name="port" value="8444"/>
> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
> <property name="server" value=""/>
> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
>
>