You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues-all@impala.apache.org by "Gabor Kaszab (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/04/01 08:24:00 UTC
[jira] [Assigned] (IMPALA-2792) Syntactic sugar for computing
aggregates over nested collections.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-2792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Gabor Kaszab reassigned IMPALA-2792:
------------------------------------
Assignee: Tamas Mate
> Syntactic sugar for computing aggregates over nested collections.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IMPALA-2792
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-2792
> Project: IMPALA
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Frontend
> Affects Versions: Impala 2.3.0
> Reporter: Alexander Behm
> Assignee: Tamas Mate
> Priority: Major
> Labels: complextype, nested_types, planner, ramp-up, usability
>
> For user convenience and SQL brevity, we should add syntax extensions to concisely express aggregates over nested collections. Internally, we should re-write the concise versions into the more verbose equivalent with a correlated inline view.
> Example A:
> {code}
> New syntax:
> select count(c.orders) from customer c
> Internally rewrite to:
> select cnt from customer c, (select count(*) from c.orders) v
> {code}
> Example B:
> {code}
> New syntax:
> select avg(c.orders.items.price) from customer c
> Internally rewrite to:
> select a from customer c, (select avg(price) from c.orders.items) v
> {code}
> I suggest performing the rewrite inside StmtRewriter.java after rewriting all subqueries from the WHERE clause.
> Similar syntactic improvements should be considered for analytic functions on nested collections.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-all-unsubscribe@impala.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-all-help@impala.apache.org