You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by javaxmlsoapdev <vi...@yahoo.com> on 2011/05/11 13:07:07 UTC
Solr performance
I have some 25 odd fields with "stored=true" in schema.xml. Retrieving back
5,000 records back takes a few secs. I also tried passing "fl" and only
include one field in the response but still response time is same. What are
the things to look to tune the performance.
Thanks,
--
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-performance-tp2926836p2926836.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr performance
Posted by Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>.
but if you ignore the default field, what would be searched unless you specify
the field?
Which is, as I understand it, your answer. Just specify q=keys:<insert
text here>
Or I completely misunderstand your question <G>
Best
Erick
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:23 AM, javaxmlsoapdev <vi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Alright. It turned out that defaultSearchField=title where title field is of
> a custom fieldType=edgyText
>
> where
> <fieldType name="edtyText" class="solr.TextField">
> <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
> maxGramSize="25" side="back"/>
> <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
> maxGramSize="25" side="front"/>
> </fieldType>
>
> so if no value in the "q" parameter is passed, solr picks up default field,
> which is tiltle of type "edgyText" taking a very long time to return
> results. Is there a way to IGNORE default(which is there in schema.xml)
> field dynamically while I only want to search filterlist on keys (e.g.
> fl=keys)? gram search is slowing things down extremely. Crazy clients want
> to have minimum word =1, which is kind of insane but that's how it is.
>
> Any idea?
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-performance-tp2926836p2935175.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Solr performance
Posted by Bill Bell <bi...@gmail.com>.
Yes just add fieldname: search string
On 5/13/11 7:23 AM, "javaxmlsoapdev" <vi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Alright. It turned out that defaultSearchField=title where title field is
>of
>a custom fieldType=edgyText
>
>where
><fieldType name="edtyText" class="solr.TextField">
> <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
>maxGramSize="25" side="back"/>
> <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
>maxGramSize="25" side="front"/>
></fieldType>
>
>so if no value in the "q" parameter is passed, solr picks up default
>field,
>which is tiltle of type "edgyText" taking a very long time to return
>results. Is there a way to IGNORE default(which is there in schema.xml)
>field dynamically while I only want to search filterlist on keys (e.g.
>fl=keys)? gram search is slowing things down extremely. Crazy clients want
>to have minimum word =1, which is kind of insane but that's how it is.
>
>Any idea?
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-performance-tp2926836p2935175.html
>Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr performance
Posted by javaxmlsoapdev <vi...@yahoo.com>.
Alright. It turned out that defaultSearchField=title where title field is of
a custom fieldType=edgyText
where
<fieldType name="edtyText" class="solr.TextField">
<filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
maxGramSize="25" side="back"/>
<filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
maxGramSize="25" side="front"/>
</fieldType>
so if no value in the "q" parameter is passed, solr picks up default field,
which is tiltle of type "edgyText" taking a very long time to return
results. Is there a way to IGNORE default(which is there in schema.xml)
field dynamically while I only want to search filterlist on keys (e.g.
fl=keys)? gram search is slowing things down extremely. Crazy clients want
to have minimum word =1, which is kind of insane but that's how it is.
Any idea?
--
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-performance-tp2926836p2935175.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr performance
Posted by Jay Luker <lb...@reallywow.com>.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:07 AM, javaxmlsoapdev <vi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have some 25 odd fields with "stored=true" in schema.xml. Retrieving back
> 5,000 records back takes a few secs. I also tried passing "fl" and only
> include one field in the response but still response time is same. What are
> the things to look to tune the performance.
Confirm that you have enableLazyFieldLoading set to true in
solrconfig.xml. I suspect it is since that's the default.
Is the request taking a few seconds the first time, but returns
quickly on subsequent requests?
Also, may or may not be relevant, but you might find a few bits of
info in this thread enlightening:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/documentCache-clarification-td1780504.html
--jay
Re: Solr performance
Posted by Ahmet Arslan <io...@yahoo.com>.
--- On Wed, 5/11/11, javaxmlsoapdev <vi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: javaxmlsoapdev <vi...@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Solr performance
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 2:07 PM
> I have some 25 odd fields with
> "stored=true" in schema.xml. Retrieving back
> 5,000 records back takes a few secs. I also tried passing
> "fl" and only
> include one field in the response but still response time
> is same. What are
> the things to look to tune the performance.
By saying response time you mean QTime in the solr response header?
Latency time is not included in solr's QTime.
Add &debugQuery=on on see which component is taking long.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors