You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@wicket.apache.org by "Martin Grigorov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/17 08:16:34 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (WICKET-5767) Decide which Github repo should be the "official" one

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14214364#comment-14214364 ] 

Martin Grigorov commented on WICKET-5767:
-----------------------------------------

1) I think you should create your own repo (or fork) and use gh-pages branch so everyone can easily see what is the current state.
Both Martijn and Chris are not actively working on their repos for quite some time.

2) I think we should use devs@ for such discussions because there are more people subscribed to dev@ than to commits@ where JIRA sends its notifications. Additionally I'm not sure what to do with these tickets now. Should I set any "Fix Version" when closed ? What should be the status ?!

> Decide which Github repo should be the "official" one
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-5767
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5767
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: site
>            Reporter: Chris Colman
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> Email from Andrea del bene:
> I think the very first priority now is to decide which Github repository should be the "official" one for this task. I think this should be Martijn's repository merged with all the changes made by Chris. I don't know if Martijn agrees with me. In this days he should be very busy with the three presentations he will hold at the incoming Apache Con in Budapest. So maybe he won't be able to reply very soon.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)