You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> on 2014/02/26 17:19:49 UTC
[CANCELED] Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.38
Due to some issues found this vote is canceled
Should I retag 1.2.38 or create 1.2.39?
If later can we use the
section name="Changes between 1.2.37 and 1.2.39"
in the changelog since 1.2.38 was not released?
On 02/26/2014 09:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.38 release candidate is ready
> for vote at [1]. This version fixes few bugs found in released
> version 1.2.37 and adds some new features like IPV6 support.
>
Regards
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [CANCELED] Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.38
Posted by Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>.
On 02/26/2014 06:10 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 26.02.2014 17:19, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> Due to some issues found this vote is canceled
>>
>> Should I retag 1.2.38 or create 1.2.39?
>
> I'd slightly prefer we switch to 1.2.39 to ensure noone is using the
> obsolete 1.2.38 instead of the released code.
>
>> If later can we use the
>> section name="Changes between 1.2.37 and 1.2.39"
>> in the changelog since 1.2.38 was not released?
>
> OK for me. We should note the "missing" 1.2.38 in the release
> announcement though.
>
... and in the STATUS as 'not released'
Regards
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [CANCELED] Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.38
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 26.02.2014 17:19, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Due to some issues found this vote is canceled
>
> Should I retag 1.2.38 or create 1.2.39?
I'd slightly prefer we switch to 1.2.39 to ensure noone is using the
obsolete 1.2.38 instead of the released code.
> If later can we use the
> section name="Changes between 1.2.37 and 1.2.39"
> in the changelog since 1.2.38 was not released?
OK for me. We should note the "missing" 1.2.38 in the release
announcement though.
Thanks!
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org