You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to xindice-users@xml.apache.org by Alexander Schatten <al...@gmx.net> on 2002/02/27 15:52:08 UTC

Re: Document malformed?? Serious Problem/Bug!

Tom Bradford wrote:

> On Tuesday, February 26, 2002, at 03:22 PM, Alexander Schatten wrote:
> 
> 
> Do the documents reference a DTD that is stored in a relative file 
> location?  If so, the server is looking for the DTDs relative to itself, 
> and can't find them.  This is because parsing actually happens in the 
> server when you're loading documents, and not at the command line tool 
> location.  To work around this, you'd have to modify the files to 
> reference an absolute file location or URI.


well, as I mentioned: simply download Batik and try out all of the SVG 
examples. out of 25 just one worked; they are o.k. in fact they hace a 
DTD reference, but an absolute one:

<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.0//EN" 
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd">

and most interestigly also the one that works has this reference. so 
they do not differ in some basic property.

(btw. I detected this problem also with some of my own documents, some 
worked, some not; thought they are validated. but I would need to send 
them to you for testing, so simply try it with the batik examples!)

I think this is a serious bug/problem and should be solved? or is there 
a basic misunderstanding on my side?


thank you


Alex