You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@iceberg.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/07/26 22:40:12 UTC

[GitHub] [iceberg] rdblue commented on a diff in pull request #5362: Python: Refactor unary expressions

rdblue commented on code in PR #5362:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/5362#discussion_r930468732


##########
python/pyiceberg/expressions/base.py:
##########
@@ -204,6 +210,7 @@ def __eq__(self, other) -> bool:
         )
 
 
+# TODO: this should still exist as a parent, but term should be abstract

Review Comment:
   The `UnaryPredicate` and `BoundUnaryPredicate` classes introduced in this PR should implement the `UnboundPredicate` and `BoundPredicate` interfaces, but I didn't want to refactor the entire set of expressions in this PR so I added this TODO as a reminder.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@iceberg.apache.org