You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openmeetings.apache.org by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com> on 2012/06/30 18:59:43 UTC
[VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Dear OpenMeetings Community,
I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0
Incubating RC3
RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of
missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files. They
claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching of
the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components.
Main changes are covered in the Readme:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README
Full Changelog:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG
Release artefacts:
http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/
PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
My vote is +1.
Best regards.
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.openmeetings.de
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Posted by German Grekhov <ge...@gmail.com>.
+1
2012/7/2 Irina Arkhipets <ia...@unipro.ru>
> +1
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: seba.wagner@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wagner@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2012 12:00 AM
> To: openmeetings-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: openmeetings-private@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
>
> Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>
> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0
> Incubating RC3
>
> RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of
> missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files. They
> claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching of
> the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components.
>
> Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README
>
> Full Changelog:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG
>
> Release artefacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> My vote is +1.
>
> Best regards.
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.openmeetings.de
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Posted by Irina Arkhipets <ia...@unipro.ru>.
+1
-----Original Message-----
From: seba.wagner@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wagner@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2012 12:00 AM
To: openmeetings-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: openmeetings-private@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Dear OpenMeetings Community,
I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0
Incubating RC3
RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of
missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files. They
claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching of
the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components.
Main changes are covered in the Readme:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README
Full Changelog:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG
Release artefacts:
http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/
PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
My vote is +1.
Best regards.
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.openmeetings.de
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Posted by greenes <zu...@gmail.com>.
+1
.......
El sáb, 30-06-2012 a las 18:59 +0200, seba.wagner@gmail.com escribió:
> Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>
> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0
> Incubating RC3
>
> RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of
> missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files. They
> claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching of
> the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components.
>
> Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README
>
> Full Changelog:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG
>
> Release artefacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> My vote is +1.
>
> Best regards.
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.openmeetings.de
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Posted by Jaime Balbino <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1
I change from PostgreSQL DB.
Now I feel right speed in charge. The performance is very nice.
Thanks,
Jaime Balbino
2012/7/1 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:59 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
> seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>>
>> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0
>> Incubating RC3
>>
>> RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of
>> missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files. They
>> claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching of
>> the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components.
>>
>> Main changes are covered in the Readme:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README
>>
>> Full Changelog:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG
>>
>> Release artefacts:
>> http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/
>>
>> Tag:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> My vote is +1.
>>
>> Best regards.
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Wagner
>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> http://www.openmeetings.de
>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:59 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>
> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0
> Incubating RC3
>
> RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of
> missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files. They
> claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching of
> the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components.
>
> Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README
>
> Full Changelog:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG
>
> Release artefacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> My vote is +1.
>
> Best regards.
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.openmeetings.de
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Hello Yegor,
To build on Windows you need:
1) Sun JDK 1.6 in the PATH
2) Apache ANT 1.8.2
3) command line svn in the PATH
AFAIK it's all
I'll correct the rat task and let you know, Thanks for pointing this out
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Yegor Kozlov <ye...@dinom.ru> wrote:
> Sorry for my belated feedback.
>
> I downloaded
> apache-openmeetings-incubating-2.0.0.r1351438-30-06-2012_1839-src.tar.gz
> , unpacked and ran ant with no target specified.
> According to
> http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/BuildInstructions.html
> it should build a distribution.
>
> (1) build on a Windows box failed with
>
> -retrieve-red5-server:
> [svn] svn: E000002: Can't make directory
> '/cygdrive/c/users/yegor/java/apache-openmeetings/rc3/C:\users\yegor\java
> \apache-openmeetings\rc3\build\red5\server': No such file or directory
> [svn] <Checkout> failed.
>
> BUILD FAILED
> C:\users\yegor\java\apache-openmeetings\rc3\build.xml:752: Can't checkout
>
> I'm using jdk1.6.0_29 and Ant 1.8.2 on Win7+Cygwin. Is it expected? Do
> I need to set any environment variables ?
>
> Build on a Linux box took 15 minutes and went well.
>
> (2) The rat:report target only checks the main source directory. This
> is not enough.
> WebContent, test and xdocs should be checked as well.
> Please re-visit and make sure that all sources have the AL header - I
> found files with missing license in all three.
>
> (3) I strongly recommend to fully document the release procedure.
>
> There are some instructions at
> http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/BuildInstructions.html
> but they are too short in my opinion. Am I missing the full document ?
>
> Ideally, the build how-to should contain all steps required to make a
> release.
> Current release manager is Sebastian, but if someone else volunteers
> he should follows the release guide.
>
> Many ASF projects have guides how to create releases, read and follow
> the pattern:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/src/documentation/release-guide.txt
> http://jackrabbit.apache.org/creating-releases.html
> http://cayenne.apache.org/release-guide.html
>
> I would like some clarifications on (1) and (2) - they are blockers
> unless you convince me in the opposite
>
>
> Regards,
> Yegor
>
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 8:59 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com
> <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear OpenMeetings Community,
> >
> > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0
> > Incubating RC3
> >
> > RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of
> > missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files.
> They
> > claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching
> of
> > the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components.
> >
> > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README
> >
> > Full Changelog:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG
> >
> > Release artefacts:
> > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/
> >
> > Tag:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > My vote is +1.
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > http://www.openmeetings.de
> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
Hi Yegor,
thanks for checking the details.
About (1):
On windows you don't need cygwin. There is no need to have any Linux
environment on Windows to build the software.
For ANT we require Apache ANT 1.8.3. That is also in our docs (but maybe
not that clearly enough)
http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/BuildInstructions.html
=> There is a section "Required software" but unfortunately its a
sub-section of "Run, Develop, Test". We should be more specific about that
in the section "How to Build a Distribution" too.
Sebastian
2012/7/5 Yegor Kozlov <ye...@dinom.ru>
> Sorry for my belated feedback.
>
> I downloaded
> apache-openmeetings-incubating-2.0.0.r1351438-30-06-2012_1839-src.tar.gz
> , unpacked and ran ant with no target specified.
> According to
> http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/BuildInstructions.html
> it should build a distribution.
>
> (1) build on a Windows box failed with
>
> -retrieve-red5-server:
> [svn] svn: E000002: Can't make directory
> '/cygdrive/c/users/yegor/java/apache-openmeetings/rc3/C:\users\yegor\java
> \apache-openmeetings\rc3\build\red5\server': No such file or directory
> [svn] <Checkout> failed.
>
> BUILD FAILED
> C:\users\yegor\java\apache-openmeetings\rc3\build.xml:752: Can't checkout
>
> I'm using jdk1.6.0_29 and Ant 1.8.2 on Win7+Cygwin. Is it expected? Do
> I need to set any environment variables ?
>
> Build on a Linux box took 15 minutes and went well.
>
> (2) The rat:report target only checks the main source directory. This
> is not enough.
> WebContent, test and xdocs should be checked as well.
> Please re-visit and make sure that all sources have the AL header - I
> found files with missing license in all three.
>
> (3) I strongly recommend to fully document the release procedure.
>
> There are some instructions at
> http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/BuildInstructions.html
> but they are too short in my opinion. Am I missing the full document ?
>
> Ideally, the build how-to should contain all steps required to make a
> release.
> Current release manager is Sebastian, but if someone else volunteers
> he should follows the release guide.
>
> Many ASF projects have guides how to create releases, read and follow
> the pattern:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/src/documentation/release-guide.txt
> http://jackrabbit.apache.org/creating-releases.html
> http://cayenne.apache.org/release-guide.html
>
> I would like some clarifications on (1) and (2) - they are blockers
> unless you convince me in the opposite
>
>
> Regards,
> Yegor
>
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 8:59 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com
> <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear OpenMeetings Community,
> >
> > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0
> > Incubating RC3
> >
> > RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of
> > missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files.
> They
> > claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching
> of
> > the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components.
> >
> > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README
> >
> > Full Changelog:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG
> >
> > Release artefacts:
> > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/
> >
> > Tag:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > My vote is +1.
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > http://www.openmeetings.de
> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.openmeetings.de
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Posted by Yegor Kozlov <ye...@dinom.ru>.
Sorry for my belated feedback.
I downloaded apache-openmeetings-incubating-2.0.0.r1351438-30-06-2012_1839-src.tar.gz
, unpacked and ran ant with no target specified.
According to http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/BuildInstructions.html
it should build a distribution.
(1) build on a Windows box failed with
-retrieve-red5-server:
[svn] svn: E000002: Can't make directory
'/cygdrive/c/users/yegor/java/apache-openmeetings/rc3/C:\users\yegor\java
\apache-openmeetings\rc3\build\red5\server': No such file or directory
[svn] <Checkout> failed.
BUILD FAILED
C:\users\yegor\java\apache-openmeetings\rc3\build.xml:752: Can't checkout
I'm using jdk1.6.0_29 and Ant 1.8.2 on Win7+Cygwin. Is it expected? Do
I need to set any environment variables ?
Build on a Linux box took 15 minutes and went well.
(2) The rat:report target only checks the main source directory. This
is not enough.
WebContent, test and xdocs should be checked as well.
Please re-visit and make sure that all sources have the AL header - I
found files with missing license in all three.
(3) I strongly recommend to fully document the release procedure.
There are some instructions at
http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/BuildInstructions.html
but they are too short in my opinion. Am I missing the full document ?
Ideally, the build how-to should contain all steps required to make a release.
Current release manager is Sebastian, but if someone else volunteers
he should follows the release guide.
Many ASF projects have guides how to create releases, read and follow
the pattern:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/src/documentation/release-guide.txt
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/creating-releases.html
http://cayenne.apache.org/release-guide.html
I would like some clarifications on (1) and (2) - they are blockers
unless you convince me in the opposite
Regards,
Yegor
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 8:59 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com
<se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>
> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0
> Incubating RC3
>
> RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of
> missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files. They
> claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching of
> the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components.
>
> Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README
>
> Full Changelog:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG
>
> Release artefacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> My vote is +1.
>
> Best regards.
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.openmeetings.de
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Posted by Yegor Kozlov <ye...@dinom.ru>.
I've seen these warnings too. I think the best solution would be to
add .swf extention to the <excludes> list in rat config.
Yegor
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Alexei Fedotov
<al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Let me share results of RAT report evaluation:
>
> [rat:report] Unapproved licenses:
> c:/Users/afedotov/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/WebContent/src/modules/conference/browser/resources/browser_sub_cit.swf
>
> As for the first file, RAT incorrectly believes that it is a text
> file. This happens due to the following: 1) .swf extension is not on
> the list of binary files; 2) heuristics based on high byte symbols
> ratio fails for this file.
>
> That's why we get a warning message.
>
> --
> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> http://dataved.ru/
> +7 916 562 8095
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> All done except for
>>
>> 1) services.list (x2) I don't know in which format comments can be added to
>> this Apache AXIS2 file
>> 2) swfobject.js licensed under MIT
>> 3) testingTools/*Test files
>>
>> @German can you take a look at 3) ? can comments be added to these files?
>> @Sebastian can you help me with 1) and 2) ?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Baskar Rajendran <
>> baskar.rajendran@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> -baskar
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:29 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
>>> seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>>> >
>>> > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0
>>> > Incubating RC3
>>> >
>>> > RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of
>>> > missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files.
>>> They
>>> > claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching
>>> of
>>> > the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components.
>>> >
>>> > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
>>> >
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README
>>> >
>>> > Full Changelog:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG
>>> >
>>> > Release artefacts:
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/
>>> >
>>> > Tag:
>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/
>>> >
>>> > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
>>> >
>>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1 approve
>>> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>> >
>>> > My vote is +1.
>>> >
>>> > Best regards.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Sebastian Wagner
>>> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>> > http://www.openmeetings.de
>>> > http://www.webbase-design.de
>>> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.
Hello folks,
Let me share results of RAT report evaluation:
[rat:report] Unapproved licenses:
c:/Users/afedotov/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp/WebContent/src/modules/conference/browser/resources/browser_sub_cit.swf
As for the first file, RAT incorrectly believes that it is a text
file. This happens due to the following: 1) .swf extension is not on
the list of binary files; 2) heuristics based on high byte symbols
ratio fails for this file.
That's why we get a warning message.
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All done except for
>
> 1) services.list (x2) I don't know in which format comments can be added to
> this Apache AXIS2 file
> 2) swfobject.js licensed under MIT
> 3) testingTools/*Test files
>
> @German can you take a look at 3) ? can comments be added to these files?
> @Sebastian can you help me with 1) and 2) ?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Baskar Rajendran <
> baskar.rajendran@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> -baskar
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:29 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
>> seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>> >
>> > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0
>> > Incubating RC3
>> >
>> > RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of
>> > missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files.
>> They
>> > claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching
>> of
>> > the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components.
>> >
>> > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README
>> >
>> > Full Changelog:
>> >
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG
>> >
>> > Release artefacts:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/
>> >
>> > Tag:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/
>> >
>> > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
>> >
>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 approve
>> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> >
>> > My vote is +1.
>> >
>> > Best regards.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sebastian Wagner
>> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> > http://www.openmeetings.de
>> > http://www.webbase-design.de
>> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
All done except for
1) services.list (x2) I don't know in which format comments can be added to
this Apache AXIS2 file
2) swfobject.js licensed under MIT
3) testingTools/*Test files
@German can you take a look at 3) ? can comments be added to these files?
@Sebastian can you help me with 1) and 2) ?
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Baskar Rajendran <
baskar.rajendran@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> -baskar
>
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:29 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
> seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear OpenMeetings Community,
> >
> > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0
> > Incubating RC3
> >
> > RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of
> > missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files.
> They
> > claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching
> of
> > the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components.
> >
> > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README
> >
> > Full Changelog:
> >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG
> >
> > Release artefacts:
> > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/
> >
> > Tag:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > My vote is +1.
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > http://www.openmeetings.de
> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
> >
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Posted by Baskar Rajendran <ba...@gmail.com>.
+1
-baskar
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:29 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>
> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0
> Incubating RC3
>
> RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of
> missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files. They
> claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching of
> the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components.
>
> Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README
>
> Full Changelog:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG
>
> Release artefacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> My vote is +1.
>
> Best regards.
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.openmeetings.de
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.
+1
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Denis Kandrov <dk...@unipro.ru> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On 30.06.2012 23:59, seba.wagner@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>>
>> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0
>> Incubating RC3
>>
>> RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of
>> missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files.
>> They
>> claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching of
>> the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components.
>>
>> Main changes are covered in the Readme:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/openmeetings/**
>> tags/2.0RC3/README<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README>
>>
>> Full Changelog:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/openmeetings/**
>> tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG>
>>
>> Release artefacts:
>> http://people.apache.org/~**sebawagner/rc3/<http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/>
>>
>> Tag:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/openmeetings/**tags/2.0RC3/<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/>
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/openmeetings/**project/KEYS<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS>
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> My vote is +1.
>>
>> Best regards.
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Wagner
>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_**lock <https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock>
>> http://www.openmeetings.de
>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.**com <http://www.wagner-sebastian.com>
>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3
Posted by Denis Kandrov <dk...@unipro.ru>.
+1
On 30.06.2012 23:59, seba.wagner@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear OpenMeetings Community,
>
> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.0
> Incubating RC3
>
> RC2 was rejected by the Apache Foundation's Incubator PMC because of
> missing specifications of exact JAR names in LICENSE and NOTICE files. They
> claim that the exact JAR file names are needed to have a exact matching of
> the section in the LICENSE file and the actual components.
>
> Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/README
>
> Full Changelog:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/CHANGELOG
>
> Release artefacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc3/
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC3/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> My vote is +1.
>
> Best regards.
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.openmeetings.de
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>