RE: Annotation-based Method Interception?

[James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>]

No thoughts on this, guys.  Here's what I have in mind...

if( servicePoint.getHint( "impl-class" ) != null ) {
  // Check impl class for annotations that you want.
}

So, basically, the ServicePoint class (I think that's what it's called)
would have name/value pair hints on it that can be set by the factories or
whatever.

-----Original Message-----
From: James Carman [mailto:james@carmanconsulting.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 9:02 AM
To: hivemind-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: Annotation-based Method Interception?

Maybe BuilderFactory could place a "hint" on the service point which tells
us the implementation class?  :-)  Boy, that sure opens up a can of worms!

-----Original Message-----
From: James Carman [mailto:james@carmanconsulting.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 8:58 AM
To: hivemind-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Annotation-based Method Interception?

All,

I really like how Tapestry did the MethodAnnotationEnhancementWorker stuff.
Do you there could be a way for us to do something like this in HiveMInd?
The problem is that we need to know the type of the implementation object,
since most of the time, annotations for stuff like transactions will be
placed on the implementation class, not the interface.

James



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hivemind-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hivemind-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org