You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> on 2010/11/02 14:48:47 UTC
moderated dev list a waste of time?
As one of your humble list moderators for some time now, I've saved a
few end users the minor aggravation, perhaps temporary, of subscribing
before posting, and of course rejected hundreds upon hundreds of spam
messages. The number of messages mistakenly accepted to the list (I'm
not saying I did that ;) ) rivals the number of rescued messages.
I'm happy to continue if the community believes that this has
non-trivial value, but I suspect it is just as well to require a
subscription before posting.
Concerns?
Re: moderated dev list a waste of time?
Posted by Bojan Smojver <bo...@rexursive.com>.
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 09:48 -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> require a subscription before posting
+1
--
Bojan
Re: moderated dev list a waste of time?
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
> Thanks for moderating.
>
> But +1 to dispensing with that chore in favour of subscription.
+1
Re: moderated dev list a waste of time?
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
On 02 Nov 2010, at 4:47 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>> I'm happy to continue if the community believes that this has
>> non-trivial value, but I suspect it is just as well to require a
>> subscription before posting.
>
> Thanks for moderating.
>
> But +1 to dispensing with that chore in favour of subscription.
Definite +1.
Regards,
Graham
--
Re: moderated dev list a waste of time?
Posted by Wes Garland <we...@page.ca>.
+1
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Nick Kew <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 2 Nov 2010, at 13:48, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> > I'm happy to continue if the community believes that this has
> > non-trivial value, but I suspect it is just as well to require a
> > subscription before posting.
>
> Thanks for moderating.
>
> But +1 to dispensing with that chore in favour of subscription.
>
> --
> Nick Kew
>
--
Wesley W. Garland
Director, Product Development
PageMail, Inc.
+1 613 542 2787 x 102
Re: moderated dev list a waste of time?
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 02.11.2010 15:47, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> On 2 Nov 2010, at 13:48, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> I'm happy to continue if the community believes that this has
>> non-trivial value, but I suspect it is just as well to require a
>> subscription before posting.
>
> Thanks for moderating.
>
> But +1 to dispensing with that chore in favour of subscription.
+1
Re: moderated dev list a waste of time?
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 11/02/2010 03:47 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On 2 Nov 2010, at 13:48, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> I'm happy to continue if the community believes that this has
>> non-trivial value, but I suspect it is just as well to require a
>> subscription before posting.
>
> Thanks for moderating.
>
> But +1 to dispensing with that chore in favour of subscription.
+1
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: moderated dev list a waste of time?
Posted by Nick Kew <ni...@apache.org>.
On 2 Nov 2010, at 13:48, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> I'm happy to continue if the community believes that this has
> non-trivial value, but I suspect it is just as well to require a
> subscription before posting.
Thanks for moderating.
But +1 to dispensing with that chore in favour of subscription.
--
Nick Kew