You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@camel.apache.org by dantam74 <da...@notima.se> on 2013/09/01 23:31:36 UTC
camel-context only seems to work within the same file or do I use
it wrong?
If I have two routes in separate files that depend on each other I'll get the
following error message:
org.apache.camel.FailedToCreateRouteException: Failed to create route
TestWhiteBox: Route[[From[context:blackbox:testBlackBox]] -> [Log[Called
b... because of Failed to resolve endpoint: context://blackbox:testBlackBox
due to: Failed to resolve endpoint: Cannot create the camel context
component for context blackbox
File 1. blackbox.xml
<camelContext id="blackbox"
xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint">
<route id="TestBlackBox">
<from uri="direct:testBlackBox"/>
<log message="Called black box"/>
</route>
</camelContext>
File 2: whitebox.xml
<camelContext id="whitebox" xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint"
depends-on="blackbox">
<route id="TestWhiteBox">
<from uri="context:blackbox:testBlackBox"/>
<log message="Called black box from white box"/>
</route>
</camelContext>
However, if I put both of the contexts in the same file it works.... But,
that to me is kind of useless because I'm separating it in different files
because I want the routes to be "black boxes" to eachother for structural
reasons.
The below file works:
File 3:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<blueprint
xmlns="http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0"
xmlns:cm="http://aries.apache.org/blueprint/xmlns/blueprint-cm/v1.0.0"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:cxf="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint/cxf"
xsi:schemaLocation="
http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0
http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0/blueprint.xsd
http://cxf.apache.org/blueprint/core
http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/blueprint/core.xsd">
<camelContext id="blackbox"
xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint">
<route id="TestBlackBox">
<from uri="direct:testBlackBox"/>
<log message="Called black box"/>
</route>
</camelContext>
<camelContext id="whitebox"
xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint" depends-on="blackbox">
<route id="TestWhiteBox">
<from uri="context:blackbox:testBlackBox"/>
<log message="Called black box from white box"/>
</route>
</camelContext>
</blueprint>
Any ideas? I would consider this a bug in the camel-context component.
--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-context-only-seems-to-work-within-the-same-file-or-do-I-use-it-wrong-tp5738442.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: camel-context only seems to work within the same file or do I
use it wrong?
Posted by dantam74 <da...@notima.se>.
Just to add my solution to my question.
I wanted to use camel-context to be able to enable me to split the camel
definition files into different modules.
I finally found the vm: component and it does exactly what I wanted to do,
ie direct communication between contexts without having for activemq or
similiar between.
--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-context-only-seems-to-work-within-the-same-file-or-do-I-use-it-wrong-tp5738442p5742205.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: camel-context only seems to work within the same file or do I
use it wrong?
Posted by pradeep <pr...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I think you can refer the below mentioned link for creating a service in one
blueprint and use the same service in other blueprint.
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/os-osgiblueprint/index.html
You have to use Service reference managers and Service managers for
creating/accessing the services.
--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-context-only-seems-to-work-within-the-same-file-or-do-I-use-it-wrong-tp5738442p5738483.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: camel-context only seems to work within the same file or do I
use it wrong?
Posted by dantam74 <da...@notima.se>.
Aha :-) I tested in Spring and it works.
I think the service approach actually is what I'm looking for, since the
import seems to "run" the xml-file again, which means if I include it in
many files, camel will try to define the routes in the included files as
many times as it's included.
Where should I look to find information about export and import
camel-context as a service?
I very much appreciate your help. I've spend almost a day on trying to
figure this out :-)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans
xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="
http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring
http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring/camel-spring.xsd
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd">
<import
resource="file:///home/idempiere/AppServers/karaf/deploy/blackbox.xml"/>
<camelContext id="whitebox" xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring"
depends-on="blackbox">
<route id="TestWhiteBox">
<from uri="context:blackbox:testBlackBox"/>
<log message="Called black box from white box"/>
</route>
</camelContext>
</beans>
--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-context-only-seems-to-work-within-the-same-file-or-do-I-use-it-wrong-tp5738442p5738480.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: camel-context only seems to work within the same file or do
I use it wrong?
Posted by Willem jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
Oh, you are using Blueprint.
Current Blueprint doesn't support to import the resource like the Spring does.
You may need to consider export the camel-conetxt as a service and import this service in another blueprint.
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Monday, September 2, 2013 at 2:15 PM, dantam74 wrote:
> Importing the resource sounds like a good idea :-) I tried it but
> unfortunately I get the following error:
>
> Caused by: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: cvc-complex-type.2.4.a: Invalid
> content was found starting with element 'import'. One of
> '{"http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0":description,
> "http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0":type-converters,
> "http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0":service,
> "http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0":reference-list,
> "http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0":bean,
> "http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0":reference,
> WC[##other:"http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0"]}' is expected.
>
> I googled a bit and I've seen other examples now. Right now the whitebox.xml
> looks as below:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <blueprint
> xmlns="http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0"
> xmlns:cm="http://aries.apache.org/blueprint/xmlns/blueprint-cm/v1.0.0"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xmlns:cxf="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint/cxf"
> xsi:schemaLocation="
> http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0
> http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0/blueprint.xsd
> http://cxf.apache.org/blueprint/core
> http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/blueprint/core.xsd">
>
> <import resource="classpath:META-INF/blackbox.xml"/>
>
> <camelContext id="whitebox"
> xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint" depends-on="blackbox">
>
> <route id="TestWhiteBox">
> <from uri="context:blackbox:testBlackBox"/>
> <log message="Called black box from white box"/>
> </route>
>
> </camelContext>
> </blueprint>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-context-only-seems-to-work-within-the-same-file-or-do-I-use-it-wrong-tp5738442p5738477.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com (http://Nabble.com).
Re: camel-context only seems to work within the same file or do I
use it wrong?
Posted by dantam74 <da...@notima.se>.
Importing the resource sounds like a good idea :-) I tried it but
unfortunately I get the following error:
Caused by: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: cvc-complex-type.2.4.a: Invalid
content was found starting with element 'import'. One of
'{"http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0":description,
"http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0":type-converters,
"http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0":service,
"http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0":reference-list,
"http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0":bean,
"http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0":reference,
WC[##other:"http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0"]}' is expected.
I googled a bit and I've seen other examples now. Right now the whitebox.xml
looks as below:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<blueprint
xmlns="http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0"
xmlns:cm="http://aries.apache.org/blueprint/xmlns/blueprint-cm/v1.0.0"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:cxf="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint/cxf"
xsi:schemaLocation="
http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0
http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0/blueprint.xsd
http://cxf.apache.org/blueprint/core
http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/blueprint/core.xsd">
<import resource="classpath:META-INF/blackbox.xml"/>
<camelContext id="whitebox"
xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint" depends-on="blackbox">
<route id="TestWhiteBox">
<from uri="context:blackbox:testBlackBox"/>
<log message="Called black box from white box"/>
</route>
</camelContext>
</blueprint>
--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-context-only-seems-to-work-within-the-same-file-or-do-I-use-it-wrong-tp5738442p5738477.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: camel-context only seems to work within the same file or do
I use it wrong?
Posted by Willem jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
How did you define the whitebox.xml?
You can using the import resource to include the camel context that you want to use just like this.
<import resource="classpath:META-INF/camel-routes.xml"/>
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Monday, September 2, 2013 at 5:31 AM, dantam74 wrote:
> If I have two routes in separate files that depend on each other I'll get the
> following error message:
>
> org.apache.camel.FailedToCreateRouteException: Failed to create route
> TestWhiteBox: Route[[From[context:blackbox:testBlackBox]] -> [Log[Called
> b... because of Failed to resolve endpoint: context://blackbox:testBlackBox
> due to: Failed to resolve endpoint: Cannot create the camel context
> component for context blackbox
>
> File 1. blackbox.xml
>
> <camelContext id="blackbox"
> xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint">
>
> <route id="TestBlackBox">
> <from uri="direct:testBlackBox"/>
> <log message="Called black box"/>
> </route>
>
> </camelContext>
>
> File 2: whitebox.xml
>
> <camelContext id="whitebox" xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint"
> depends-on="blackbox">
>
> <route id="TestWhiteBox">
> <from uri="context:blackbox:testBlackBox"/>
> <log message="Called black box from white box"/>
> </route>
>
> </camelContext>
>
> However, if I put both of the contexts in the same file it works.... But,
> that to me is kind of useless because I'm separating it in different files
> because I want the routes to be "black boxes" to eachother for structural
> reasons.
>
> The below file works:
>
> File 3:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <blueprint
> xmlns="http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0"
> xmlns:cm="http://aries.apache.org/blueprint/xmlns/blueprint-cm/v1.0.0"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xmlns:cxf="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint/cxf"
> xsi:schemaLocation="
> http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0
> http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0/blueprint.xsd
> http://cxf.apache.org/blueprint/core
> http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/blueprint/core.xsd">
>
> <camelContext id="blackbox"
> xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint">
>
> <route id="TestBlackBox">
> <from uri="direct:testBlackBox"/>
> <log message="Called black box"/>
> </route>
>
> </camelContext>
>
> <camelContext id="whitebox"
> xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint" depends-on="blackbox">
>
> <route id="TestWhiteBox">
> <from uri="context:blackbox:testBlackBox"/>
> <log message="Called black box from white box"/>
> </route>
>
> </camelContext>
> </blueprint>
>
> Any ideas? I would consider this a bug in the camel-context component.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-context-only-seems-to-work-within-the-same-file-or-do-I-use-it-wrong-tp5738442.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com (http://Nabble.com).