You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nutch.apache.org by Gal Nitzan <ga...@gmail.com> on 2007/02/23 16:13:30 UTC

SOLR

Hi,

Since I ran into SOLR project the other day I was wandering that maybe SOLR 
could be Nutch's SE...


Both projects complement each other in some sense.

Any thoughts?

Gal.




Re: SOLR

Posted by rubdabadub <ru...@gmail.com>.
>
> Would love to see Sami's patch in trunk as an indexing plugin, though.

Brian,

Please vote for it.

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-442

Cheers

Re: SOLR

Posted by Brian Whitman <br...@variogr.am>.
On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:13 AM, Gal Nitzan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since I ran into SOLR project the other day I was wandering that  
> maybe SOLR
> could be Nutch's SE...


We've been using it since I realized we could not get the Lucene  
queries we wanted out of the Nutch OpenSearch SE. Solr also  
integrates a lot better with back end development as it outputs in  
JSON, XML and Python. It's even more valuable with Sami's SolrIndexer  
patch that he has on his blog-- Nutch indexing now goes straight to  
Solr. It's very fast and so far robust -- I've lazily crawled 600K  
pages on a single CPU (with stored content!) in the past few days  
after integrating Sami's stuff with no obvious problems yet.

 From what I can tell, you lose some of the advanced Nutch scoring  
features. We get the document boost (Sami, I owe you a patch) but  
that's about it. The Nutch SE is also a great "Google in a Box" setup  
for people that want that. For that reason I am not so sure Solr  
should replace Nutch's SE. Solr is more useful for people that want  
to do something programatically or queries more complex than "AND"  
with the Nutch. There's no search front end in Solr other than the  
admin interface.

Would love to see Sami's patch in trunk as an indexing plugin, though.

-Brian