You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2006/03/09 03:08:09 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38784] - LoadBundle basename property is not set

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38784>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38784





------- Additional Comments From craig.mcclanahan@sun.com  2006-03-09 02:08 -------
How is your LoadBundle instance actually getting configured?  The expectation of
the property resolver is that the LoadBundle instance will have been configured
already before it is referenced in an expression.  The easiest way to do that is
to make it a managed bean that includes initialization of the basename property
in the managed bean definition, as described in the javadocs.

http://struts.apache.org/struts-shale/shale-core/apidocs/org/apache/shale/util/LoadBundle.html


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org