Re: [Bug 9858] New: - ApacheMonitor can not start service due to bug in service.c or ApacheMonitor.c (fwd)

["William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

This is the same bug as winnt's mpm that Jeff Trawick's -k patch
introduced, we used to ignore this accidental non-switch 'parameter'
but the parsing change showed this up as a bug.

I'll let Mladen author the patch and apply later today :-)  The answer is
pretty trivial, we simply shouldn't have ever provided an argv[0] to
the StartService call.  The old parsers [1.3/2.0] both overlooked this bug.

Bill


At 09:52 PM 6/13/2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:

>Ideas, anybody?  this sounds like it's a recent bug.


http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9858

ApacheMonitor can not start service due to bug in service.c or ApacheMonitor.c

>My service.c revision is 1.53.
>ApacheMonitor passes to StartService array of argv with argv[0]
>== "...Apache2.exe". SCM inserts additional argument ("service name") before
>argv[0], and this extra argument causes service to fail during startup.
>
>Last 1.53 revision of fixes same issue for "-k start" argument, but I have "-k
>runservice" and it is not working.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org

RE: [Bug 9858] New: - ApacheMonitor can not start service due to bug in service.c or ApacheMonitor.c (fwd)

[Mladen Turk <mt...@mappingsoft.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net] 
> Sent: 14. lipanj 2002 9:18
> To: Cliff Woolley
> Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Bug 9858] New: - ApacheMonitor can not start 
> service due to bug in service.c or ApacheMonitor.c (fwd)
> 
> 
> This is the same bug as winnt's mpm that Jeff Trawick's -k 
> patch introduced, we used to ignore this accidental 
> non-switch 'parameter' but the parsing change showed this up as a bug.
> 
> I'll let Mladen author the patch and apply later today :-)  
> The answer is pretty trivial, we simply shouldn't have ever 
> provided an argv[0] to the StartService call.  The old 
> parsers [1.3/2.0] both overlooked this bug.
> 

Yes, now that I look that don't know why did I even done all that arg
parsing...
It works even without args :-).

If doesn't theN just  replace the line 775 with the args[0] = NULL;


MT.