You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pig.apache.org by "Gianmarco De Francisci Morales (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/09/12 18:06:09 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (PIG-1387) Syntactical Sugar for PIG-1385

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Gianmarco De Francisci Morales updated PIG-1387:
------------------------------------------------

    Attachment: PIG-1387.3.patch

Back on the task.

Attaching PIG-1387.3.patch

Now the feature should work as intended.
Single element tuples do not trigger a TOTUPLE call.

{code}
 a = load 'a.txt' as (id:int,num:int); c = foreach a generate ($1) + 1;
grunt> dump c
(12)
(4)
(11)
(12)
(11)
(16)

{code}

For the tests, I was planning to write 2 equivalent scripts (sugarized/non-sugarized) and compare the logical plans.

This should make them faster and test exactly what the feature should do.

Any comments on this?
Also, where should this kind of tests go with the new test layout?

> Syntactical Sugar for PIG-1385
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-1387
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1387
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: grunt
>    Affects Versions: 0.6.0
>            Reporter: hc busy
>            Assignee: Gianmarco De Francisci Morales
>              Labels: gsoc2011
>             Fix For: 0.10
>
>         Attachments: PIG-1387.1.patch, PIG-1387.2.patch, PIG-1387.3.patch
>
>
> From this conversation, extend PIG-1385 to instead of calling UDF use built-in behavior when the (),{},[] groupings are encountered.
> > > What about making them part of the language using symbols?
> > >
> > > instead of
> > >
> > > foreach T generate Tuple($0, $1, $2), Bag($3, $4, $5), $6, $7;
> > >
> > > have language support
> > >
> > > foreach T generate ($0, $1, $2), {$3, $4, $5}, $6, $7;
> > >
> > > or even:
> > >
> > > foreach T generate ($0, $1, $2), {$3, $4, $5}, [$6#$7, $8#$9], $10, $11;
> > >
> > >
> > > Is there reason not to do the second or third other than being more
> > > complicated?
> > >
> > > Certainly I'd volunteer to put the top implementation in to the util
> > > package and submit them for builtin's, but the latter syntactic candies
> > > seems more natural..
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Alan Gates <ga...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> The grouping package in piggybank is left over from back when Pig
> > allowed
> > >> users to define grouping functions (0.1).  Functions like these should
> > go in
> > >> evaluation.util.
> > >>
> > >> However, I'd consider putting these in builtin (in main Pig) instead.
> > >>  These are things everyone asks for and they seem like a reasonable
> > addition
> > >> to the core engine.  This will be more of a burden to write (as we'll
> > hold
> > >> them to a higher standard) but of more use to people as well.
> > >>
> > >> Alan.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:53 PM, hc busy wrote:
> > >>
> > >>  Some times I wonder... I mean, somebody went to the trouble of making a
> > >>> path
> > >>> called
> > >>>
> > >>> org.apache.pig.piggybank.grouping
> > >>>
> > >>> (where it seems like this code belong), but didn't check in any java
> > code
> > >>> into that package.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Any comment about where to put this kind of utility classes?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Andrey S <oc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>  2010/4/19 hc busy <hc...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  That's just the way it is right now, you can't make bags or tuples
> > >>>>> directly... Maybe we should have some UDF's in piggybank for these:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> toBag()
> > >>>>> toTuple(); --which is kinda like exec(Tuple in){return in;}
> > >>>>> TupleToBag(); --some times you need it this way for some reason.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>  Ok. I place my current code here, may be later I make a patch (if
> > such
> > >>>> implementation is acceptable of course).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> import org.apache.pig.EvalFunc;
> > >>>> import org.apache.pig.data.BagFactory;
> > >>>> import org.apache.pig.data.DataBag;
> > >>>> import org.apache.pig.data.Tuple;
> > >>>> import org.apache.pig.data.TupleFactory;
> > >>>>
> > >>>> import java.io.IOException;
> > >>>>
> > >>>> /**
> > >>>> * Convert any sequence of fields to bag with specified count of
> > >>>> fields<br>
> > >>>> * Schema: count:int, fld1 [, fld2, fld3, fld4... ].
> > >>>> * Output: count=2, then { (fld1, fld2) , (fld3, fld4) ... }
> > >>>> *
> > >>>> * @author astepachev
> > >>>> */
> > >>>> public class ToBag extends EvalFunc<DataBag> {
> > >>>>  public BagFactory bagFactory;
> > >>>>  public TupleFactory tupleFactory;
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  public ToBag() {
> > >>>>      bagFactory = BagFactory.getInstance();
> > >>>>      tupleFactory = TupleFactory.getInstance();
> > >>>>  }
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  @Override
> > >>>>  public DataBag exec(Tuple input) throws IOException {
> > >>>>      if (input.isNull())
> > >>>>          return null;
> > >>>>      final DataBag bag = bagFactory.newDefaultBag();
> > >>>>      final Integer couter = (Integer) input.get(0);
> > >>>>      if (couter == null)
> > >>>>          return null;
> > >>>>      Tuple tuple = tupleFactory.newTuple();
> > >>>>      for (int i = 0; i < input.size() - 1; i++) {
> > >>>>          if (i % couter == 0) {
> > >>>>              tuple = tupleFactory.newTuple();
> > >>>>              bag.add(tuple);
> > >>>>          }
> > >>>>          tuple.append(input.get(i + 1));
> > >>>>      }
> > >>>>      return bag;
> > >>>>  }
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> import org.apache.pig.ExecType;
> > >>>> import org.apache.pig.PigServer;
> > >>>> import org.junit.Before;
> > >>>> import org.junit.Test;
> > >>>>
> > >>>> import java.io.IOException;
> > >>>> import java.net.URISyntaxException;
> > >>>> import java.net.URL;
> > >>>>
> > >>>> import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
> > >>>>
> > >>>> /**
> > >>>> * @author astepachev
> > >>>> */
> > >>>> public class ToBagTest {
> > >>>>  PigServer pigServer;
> > >>>>  URL inputTxt;
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  @Before
> > >>>>  public void init() throws IOException, URISyntaxException {
> > >>>>      pigServer = new PigServer(ExecType.LOCAL);
> > >>>>      inputTxt =
> > >>>> this.getClass().getResource("bagTest.txt").toURI().toURL();
> > >>>>  }
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  @Test
> > >>>>  public void testSimple() throws IOException {
> > >>>>      pigServer.registerQuery("a = load '" + inputTxt.toExternalForm()
> > +
> > >>>> "' using PigStorage(',') " +
> > >>>>              "as (id:int, a:chararray, b:chararray, c:chararray,
> > >>>> d:chararray);");
> > >>>>      pigServer.registerQuery("last = foreach a generate flatten(" +
> > >>>> ToBag.class.getName() + "(2, id, a, id, b, id, c));");
> > >>>>
> > >>>>      pigServer.deleteFile("target/pigtest/func1.txt");
> > >>>>      pigServer.store("last", "target/pigtest/func1.txt");
> > >>>>      assertTrue(pigServer.fileSize("target/pigtest/func1.txt") > 0);
> > >>>>  }
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> This is a candidate project for Google summer of code 2011. More information about the program can be found at http://wiki.apache.org/pig/GSoc2011

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira