You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cactus-dev@jakarta.apache.org by Vincent Massol <vm...@pivolis.com> on 2003/09/13 17:21:48 UTC
RE: Patch for JBoss starting too slow
Hi Florin,
I was busy when you submitted all these nice ideas and patches on the
cactus mailing list so I may not have been as responsive as I should
have. I am just checking now if everything is working fine for you and
whether there's any pending thing to commit?
Re: Patch for JBoss starting too slow
Posted by Florin Vancea <fv...@maxiq.ro>.
Thanks for the callback, anyway.
I got around some issues by patching my own copy of Cactus, others were
taken care of by Christopher.
Florin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vincent Massol" <vm...@pivolis.com>
To: "'Cactus Developers List'" <ca...@jakarta.apache.org>
Cc: <fv...@maxiq.ro>
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 6:21 PM
Subject: RE: Patch for JBoss starting too slow
> Hi Florin,
>
> I was busy when you submitted all these nice ideas and patches on the
> cactus mailing list so I may not have been as responsive as I should
> have. I am just checking now if everything is working fine for you and
> whether there's any pending thing to commit?
>
> >From looking at the source code, it seems Chris has committed your patch
> for the URL check.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Florin Vancea [mailto:fvancea@maxiq.ro]
> > Sent: 09 July 2003 15:42
> > To: Cactus Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Patch for JBoss starting too slow
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Christopher Lenz" <cm...@gmx.de>
> > To: "Cactus Developers List" <ca...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 4:08 PM
> > Subject: Re: Patch for JBoss starting too slow
> >
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > I agree, and actually I thought it was doing that already ;-)
> > >
> > > So this also makes it unnecessary to expose the wait times, as
> discussed
> > before?
> >
> > I guess so. At least it works fine for me.
> >
> > >
> > > > I also attach a patch (not necessarily the best approach :) ).
> > >
> > > The patch looks good, and I'll commit it. Thanks!
> >
> > Great!
> >
> > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Florin
> > > >
> > > > P.S. Seems that the JMX bean that I posted earlier (last week) was
> not
> > > > considered a good approach by anyone. Some feedback would have
> been
> > nice,
> > > > though. I hope this one _will_ get some kind of answer (any,
> including
> > "quit
> > > > bugging us").
> > >
> > > I've read your message and had a quick glimpse at the javadocs, but
> > haven't
> > > had the time to look in more detail, which would be necessary to
> give
> > any
> > > kind of half-intelligent feedback :-P
> >
> > Now I know who was bothering to look at them (I was kind of monitoring
> the
> > accesses) :)
> >
> > Actually after I took a deeper look at the Cactus-integration sources
> I
> > see
> > that hot-deployment is not provisioned for in the current
> architecture, so
> > my bean is not that useful for Cactus.
> > I myself am currently pre-deploying (with JMX wait) before launching
> the
> > <cactus...> task. It works well (with JBoss pre-started) and IMO
> there's
> > no
> > reason for doing any changes.
> > Maybe I jumped the gun a little when suggesting the inclusion of JMX
> wait.
> > Now I realize that not all containers may support hot-deploy and
> that's
> > not
> > Cactus's concern anyway since pre-deployment is possible.
> >
> > >
> > > Don't give up yet!
> >
> > Won't, thanks.
> >
> > Florin
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: cactus-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: cactus-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cactus-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: cactus-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Patch for JBoss starting too slow
Posted by Christopher Lenz <cm...@gmx.de>.
Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi Florin,
>
> I was busy when you submitted all these nice ideas and patches on the
> cactus mailing list so I may not have been as responsive as I should
> have. I am just checking now if everything is working fine for you and
> whether there's any pending thing to commit?
>
>>From looking at the source code, it seems Chris has committed your patch
> for the URL check.
Yup :-)
--
Christopher Lenz
/=/ cmlenz at gmx.de
Re: Patch for JBoss starting too slow
Posted by Florin Vancea <fv...@maxiq.ro>.
Thanks for the callback, anyway.
I got around some issues by patching my own copy of Cactus, others were
taken care of by Christopher.
Florin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vincent Massol" <vm...@pivolis.com>
To: "'Cactus Developers List'" <ca...@jakarta.apache.org>
Cc: <fv...@maxiq.ro>
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 6:21 PM
Subject: RE: Patch for JBoss starting too slow
> Hi Florin,
>
> I was busy when you submitted all these nice ideas and patches on the
> cactus mailing list so I may not have been as responsive as I should
> have. I am just checking now if everything is working fine for you and
> whether there's any pending thing to commit?
>
> >From looking at the source code, it seems Chris has committed your patch
> for the URL check.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Florin Vancea [mailto:fvancea@maxiq.ro]
> > Sent: 09 July 2003 15:42
> > To: Cactus Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Patch for JBoss starting too slow
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Christopher Lenz" <cm...@gmx.de>
> > To: "Cactus Developers List" <ca...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 4:08 PM
> > Subject: Re: Patch for JBoss starting too slow
> >
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > I agree, and actually I thought it was doing that already ;-)
> > >
> > > So this also makes it unnecessary to expose the wait times, as
> discussed
> > before?
> >
> > I guess so. At least it works fine for me.
> >
> > >
> > > > I also attach a patch (not necessarily the best approach :) ).
> > >
> > > The patch looks good, and I'll commit it. Thanks!
> >
> > Great!
> >
> > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Florin
> > > >
> > > > P.S. Seems that the JMX bean that I posted earlier (last week) was
> not
> > > > considered a good approach by anyone. Some feedback would have
> been
> > nice,
> > > > though. I hope this one _will_ get some kind of answer (any,
> including
> > "quit
> > > > bugging us").
> > >
> > > I've read your message and had a quick glimpse at the javadocs, but
> > haven't
> > > had the time to look in more detail, which would be necessary to
> give
> > any
> > > kind of half-intelligent feedback :-P
> >
> > Now I know who was bothering to look at them (I was kind of monitoring
> the
> > accesses) :)
> >
> > Actually after I took a deeper look at the Cactus-integration sources
> I
> > see
> > that hot-deployment is not provisioned for in the current
> architecture, so
> > my bean is not that useful for Cactus.
> > I myself am currently pre-deploying (with JMX wait) before launching
> the
> > <cactus...> task. It works well (with JBoss pre-started) and IMO
> there's
> > no
> > reason for doing any changes.
> > Maybe I jumped the gun a little when suggesting the inclusion of JMX
> wait.
> > Now I realize that not all containers may support hot-deploy and
> that's
> > not
> > Cactus's concern anyway since pre-deployment is possible.
> >
> > >
> > > Don't give up yet!
> >
> > Won't, thanks.
> >
> > Florin
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: cactus-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: cactus-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>