You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-user@logging.apache.org by aanjaneya shukla <sh...@gmail.com> on 2012/05/07 16:11:36 UTC
log4j window size
Hi,
Is there any specific reason for having a max index at 13 in log4j? Since
we can archive the log files with significant compression we can increase
this.
Thanks
Re: log4j window size
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Stadelmann Josef
<jo...@axa-winterthur.ch> wrote:
> why not a different renaming schema where only one file,
> the current to be rolled over file has to be renamed?
+1 for configurable naming strategies - everybody to his taste.
Patches are welcome! :-)
> Josef
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Curt Arnold [mailto:curt.arnld@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Curt Arnold
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2012 07:30
> An: Log4J Users List
> Betreff: Re: log4j window size
>
> I believe the renaming time can become significant depending on the platform. Unless wrapped in an async appender, this can cause the rollover logic block the caller for an extended period of time.
>
>
> On May 7, 2012, at 9:11 AM, aanjaneya shukla wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Is there any specific reason for having a max index at 13 in log4j? Since
>> we can archive the log files with significant compression we can increase
>> this.
>> Thanks
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
>
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
AW: log4j window size
Posted by Stadelmann Josef <jo...@axa-winterthur.ch>.
why not a different renaming schema where only one file,
the current to be rolled over file has to be renamed?
Josef
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Curt Arnold [mailto:curt.arnld@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Curt Arnold
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2012 07:30
An: Log4J Users List
Betreff: Re: log4j window size
I believe the renaming time can become significant depending on the platform. Unless wrapped in an async appender, this can cause the rollover logic block the caller for an extended period of time.
On May 7, 2012, at 9:11 AM, aanjaneya shukla wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there any specific reason for having a max index at 13 in log4j? Since
> we can archive the log files with significant compression we can increase
> this.
> Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
Re: log4j window size
Posted by Curt Arnold <ca...@apache.org>.
I believe the renaming time can become significant depending on the platform. Unless wrapped in an async appender, this can cause the rollover logic block the caller for an extended period of time.
On May 7, 2012, at 9:11 AM, aanjaneya shukla wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there any specific reason for having a max index at 13 in log4j? Since
> we can archive the log files with significant compression we can increase
> this.
> Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org