You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by "Peter Klügl (Jira)" <de...@uima.apache.org> on 2020/12/04 15:48:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-6281) Ruta: use uimaFIT instead of CAS.select().coveredBy() internally

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17244067#comment-17244067 ] 

Peter Klügl commented on UIMA-6281:
-----------------------------------

The problem seems to go away with Richards fixes in uimaj. So I'll likely gonna wait for the uimaj release and close this ticket as won't do.

> Ruta: use uimaFIT instead of CAS.select().coveredBy() internally
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-6281
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6281
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Ruta
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.1ruta
>            Reporter: Peter Klügl
>            Assignee: Peter Klügl
>            Priority: Major
>
> There seems to be a problem in CAS.select().coveredBy() in combinations with type priorities. Rerwite logic with uimaFIT methds for now.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)