You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by "Ted Dunning (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/06/03 23:42:20 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-1239) Standardize form of log-likelihood
computation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13673617#comment-13673617 ]
Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-1239:
-------------------------------------
Looks fine to me. Go ahead and drop it in.
> Standardize form of log-likelihood computation
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAHOUT-1239
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1239
> Project: Mahout
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.7
> Reporter: Sean Owen
> Assignee: Sean Owen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.8
>
> Attachments: MAHOUT-1239.patch
>
>
> qzchenwl@gmail.com reported that LogLikelihood.logLikelihoodRatio() looked like its formula was incorrect, at least with respect to http://tdunning.blogspot.mx/2008/03/surprise-and-coincidence.html
> It appears that the calculation is correct but in a different form, that is not immediately recognizable as correct. The proposal here is to change the code to match the blog post and avoid confusion (and ends up avoiding 2 method calls).
> (Along the way, I think this fixes a tiny other problem in a related test. We have a test case that detects when round-off would produce a negative LLR and should be clamped to 0, but the test asserts that the result is >0 not >=0.)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira