StateFun deployement options

[Christopher Gustafson <ch...@kth.se>]

Hi,


I am looking into ways to deploy StateFun jobs. I noticed that the option of packaging a StateFun job as a fat jar to an existing flink cluster was described in the 2.2 version of the docs<https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.2/deployment-and-operations/packaging.html> but not in the latest versions. Is this way of deploying StateFun jobs still supported, and in that case are there any additional steps that has to be taken?

Best Regards,

Christopher Gustafson

SV: StateFun deployement options

[Christopher Gustafson <ch...@kth.se>]

Hi Igal,

I have been reading some threads but the ones I found was fairly old and thus I wasn't sure whether the solutions were accurate or not. If you have any threads that explain how to deploy SF as a Flink Job please do. I have been trying the suggested version from the old docs but haven't succeeded in deploying it.

Best,
Christopher


________________________________
Från: Igal Shilman <ig...@apache.org>
Skickat: den 1 februari 2022 12:26:52
Till: Christopher Gustafson
Kopia: user@flink.apache.org
Ämne: Re: StateFun deployement options

Hello Christopher,

The most common deployment of StateFun applications is via the community provided Docker images[1] (and their derivations) . This image captures the optimal deployment of Flink for StateFun.
In addition, there is also an example of how to deploy these images to k8s[2].
If you are exploring SF and trying to get started, then you can simply explore the Stateful functions playground[3] and start up an entire env via docker-compose.

If your env requires deploying SF as a Flink job this is still possible, and few folks have been asking this in the past, and I'm sure you can find these threads in the archive, if not let me know and I will point you in the right direction.

[1] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/flink-statefun
[2] https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun-playground/tree/release-3.1/deployments/k8s
[3] https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun-playground/tree/release-3.1

All the best!
Igal



On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 11:57 AM Christopher Gustafson <ch...@kth.se>> wrote:

Hi,


I am looking into ways to deploy StateFun jobs. I noticed that the option of packaging a StateFun job as a fat jar to an existing flink cluster was described in the 2.2 version of the docs<https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.2/deployment-and-operations/packaging.html> but not in the latest versions. Is this way of deploying StateFun jobs still supported, and in that case are there any additional steps that has to be taken?

Best Regards,

Christopher Gustafson

Re: StateFun deployement options

[Igal Shilman <ig...@apache.org>]

Hello Christopher,

The most common deployment of StateFun applications is via the community
provided Docker images[1] (and their derivations) . This image captures the
optimal deployment of Flink for StateFun.
In addition, there is also an example of how to deploy these images to
k8s[2].
If you are exploring SF and trying to get started, then you can simply
explore the Stateful functions playground[3] and start up an entire env via
docker-compose.

If your env requires deploying SF as a Flink job this is still possible,
and few folks have been asking this in the past, and I'm sure you can find
these threads in the archive, if not let me know and I will point you in
the right direction.

[1] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/flink-statefun
[2]
https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun-playground/tree/release-3.1/deployments/k8s
[3] https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun-playground/tree/release-3.1

All the best!
Igal



On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 11:57 AM Christopher Gustafson <ch...@kth.se> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> I am looking into ways to deploy StateFun jobs. I noticed that the option
> of packaging a StateFun job as a fat jar to an existing flink cluster was
> described in the 2.2 version of the docs
> <https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.2/deployment-and-operations/packaging.html> but
> not in the latest versions. Is this way of deploying StateFun jobs still
> supported, and in that case are there any additional steps that has to be
> taken?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Christopher Gustafson
>