You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by "Martin Marinschek (JIRA)" <de...@myfaces.apache.org> on 2005/12/23 09:10:32 UTC

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-821) Usage of request attributes for caching

    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-821?page=comments#action_12361180 ] 

Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-821:
-------------------------------------------

On the issue itself - how would prepending the viewid solve the issue?

What if you have two portlets of the same jsf-app on the same page, and they are on the same view-id in the moment?

Your solution sounds reasonable - but doesn't go far enough, cause the client won't know anything about this, and will send the request attributes in just as they were set originally?

regards,

Martin

> Usage of request attributes for caching
> ---------------------------------------
>
>          Key: MYFACES-821
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-821
>      Project: MyFaces
>         Type: Bug
>     Versions: 1.1.0
>  Environment: liferay 3.6.1
>     Reporter: Michael Lipp

>
> JspStateManagerImpl (and maybe other classes) uses request attributes for caching state. This causes a wrong view to be used if there is more than one JSF-based portlet on a single page. MyFaces saves the serialized view of the first portlet on the page as a request attribute. To avoid re-serialization, MyFaces subsequently checks if there already is a request attribute with a serialized view. As request attributes are not scoped to a single portlet (the portlet specification does not require this), the serialized view of the first portlet will be found and used by the second portlet.
> This usage of request attributes may also be the cause of MYFACES-549.
> As JSF, of course, does not need to know about the portlet environment, it cannot be required that MyFaces saves such information "per view", e.g. by prepending the viewId to the key for the request attribute (although this would solve the problem). IMHO any request attributes added during lifecycle.render() should be removed after lifecycle() render by the portlet bridge. (The same applies to request attributes added during lifecycle.execute(), but these should also be re-added before lifecycle.render().) I have implemented this in my portlet bridge as a workaround.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira