[wicket-contrib-dojo] JDK 1.4 or JDK 1.5?

[Bart Molenkamp <b....@bizzdesign.nl>]

Hi,

I'm a little bit confused about wicket-contrib-dojo and their minimum
JDK requirement (1.4 or 1.5). Currently, it seems that
wicket-contrib-dojo requires 1.5 and that wicket-contrib-dojo-examples
requires 1.4. This last one isn't building because it contains @Override
annotations in the sample code, which doesn't work with JDK 1.4.

So, should it use 1.4 (and thus remove the annotations) or use 1.5
(update pom.xml)??

Thanks,
Bart.

Re: [wicket-contrib-dojo] JDK 1.4 or JDK 1.5?

[Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jb...@apache.org>]

* Vincent Demay:

> Actually WCD  was jdk1.4 compliant  but a recent issue  has been
> open  (http://81.17.46.170:8090/jira/browse/DOJO-27) to  move to
> 1.4.
  ^^^^

To 1.5 you mean!
-- 
     Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka  John Banana   Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/

Re: [wicket-contrib-dojo] JDK 1.4 or JDK 1.5?

[Vincent Demay <vi...@anyware-tech.com>]

Hi Bart

Actually WCD was jdk1.4 compliant but a recent issue has been open 
(http://81.17.46.170:8090/jira/browse/DOJO-27) to move to 1.4. But you 
are right. We also need to move example from 1.4 to 1.5. I will update 
pom.xml file.

Cheers
--
Vincent


Bart Molenkamp a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm a little bit confused about wicket-contrib-dojo and their minimum
> JDK requirement (1.4 or 1.5). Currently, it seems that
> wicket-contrib-dojo requires 1.5 and that wicket-contrib-dojo-examples
> requires 1.4. This last one isn't building because it contains @Override
> annotations in the sample code, which doesn't work with JDK 1.4.
>
> So, should it use 1.4 (and thus remove the annotations) or use 1.5
> (update pom.xml)??
>
> Thanks,
> Bart.
>
>