Re: [VOTE][policy] policy neutral clean up for policy document, phase two

[Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>]

+1 (non-binding) for all three. I've commented on /INCUBATOR-39 but  
vote in favor regardless of the resolution.

Craig

On Jul 29, 2006, at 2:44 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:

> a few more changes that i think that policy neutral (please jump in if
> i am mistaken)
>
> i'm +1to all
>
> - robert
>
> --8<------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> ------------
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-37 moves material
> which is not related to the proposal from the proposal section into
> the section above
>
> [ ] +1 approve these changes to the document
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1reject these changes
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-38 replaces an empty
> statement about proposal policy with a link to the proposal guide and
> tightens some langauge.
>
> [ ] +1 approve these changes to the document
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1reject these changes
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-39 more consistent use
> of language - sponsor *approves* whereas incubator *accepts* should
> make the policy easier to read.
>
> [ ] +1 approve these changes to the document
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1reject these changes
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!