You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "stack (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/07/14 07:41:05 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12751) Allow RowLock to be reader writer

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14625855#comment-14625855 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-12751:
-------------------------------

Took another look at patch. Nice cleanup. How is order in memstore for sure matching the append order to WAL now? What we need to get this in? You need a bit of testing on this end? Just say and I can try some stuff...



> Allow RowLock to be reader writer
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-12751
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12751
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: regionserver
>            Reporter: Elliott Clark
>            Assignee: Elliott Clark
>         Attachments: HBASE-12751-v1.patch, HBASE-12751-v10.patch, HBASE-12751-v10.patch, HBASE-12751-v11.patch, HBASE-12751-v12.patch, HBASE-12751-v2.patch, HBASE-12751-v3.patch, HBASE-12751-v4.patch, HBASE-12751-v5.patch, HBASE-12751-v6.patch, HBASE-12751-v7.patch, HBASE-12751-v8.patch, HBASE-12751-v9.patch, HBASE-12751.patch
>
>
> Right now every write operation grabs a row lock. This is to prevent values from changing during a read modify write operation (increment or check and put). However it limits parallelism in several different scenarios.
> If there are several puts to the same row but different columns or stores then this is very limiting.
> If there are puts to the same column then mvcc number should ensure a consistent ordering. So locking is not needed.
> However locking for check and put or increment is still needed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)