SQL State 58009 "Network protocol exception: actual code point, {0}, ..."

[Laura Stewart <sc...@gmail.com>]

For this message is it more accurate to use <value> for both of these
variables or <codePoint> or <codepointValue>

The current text is:

58009  "Network protocol exception: actual code point, 0}, does not
match expected code point, {1}.  The connection has been terminated."

-- 
Laura Stewart

Re: SQL State 58009 "Network protocol exception: actual code point, {0}, ..."

[Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com>]

On 9/7/06, Laura Stewart <sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For this message is it more accurate to use <value> for both of these
> variables or <codePoint> or <codepointValue>
>
> The current text is:
>
> 58009  "Network protocol exception: actual code point, 0}, does not
> match expected code point, {1}.  The connection has been terminated."

Both of these will be constant values from the class
org.apache.derby.client.net.CodePoint.

I think that either <codepoint> or <codepointValue> is acceptable, and
certainly more to the point than just <value>. But maybe
<drdaCodepoint> is more descriptive without being too long?

andrew