You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by tc...@apache.org on 2007/04/18 01:46:13 UTC

svn commit: r529805 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site: site.xml xdoc/faq.xml

Author: tcurdt
Date: Tue Apr 17 16:46:08 2007
New Revision: 529805

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=529805
Log:
rephrased a few o=paragraphs,
fixed broken links


Modified:
    jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml
    jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml

Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml?view=diff&rev=529805&r1=529804&r2=529805
==============================================================================
--- jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml (original)
+++ jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml Tue Apr 17 16:46:08 2007
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
+<?xml version="1.0"?>
 <project name="Jakarta Commons JCI">
     <bannerRight>
         <name>Jakarta Commons JCI</name>
@@ -7,10 +7,10 @@
     </bannerRight>
     <body>
         <menu name="Jakarta Commons JCI">
-            <item name="About" href="index.html"/>
-            <item name="Usage" href="usage.html"/>
-            <item name="FAQ" href="faq.html"/>
-            <item name="Downloads" href="downloads.html"/>
+            <item name="About" href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/index.html"/>
+            <item name="Usage" href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/usage.html"/>
+            <item name="FAQ" href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/faq.html"/>
+            <item name="Downloads" href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/downloads.html"/>
         </menu>
         <menu ref="modules"/>
     </body>

Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml?view=diff&rev=529805&r1=529804&r2=529805
==============================================================================
--- jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml (original)
+++ jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml Tue Apr 17 16:46:08 2007
@@ -7,11 +7,11 @@
     <body>
         <section name="FAQ">
             <subsection name="Isn't compiler support integrated with Java6 (JSR199)?">
-                Yes, it is now. JSR199 that in the end brought the official java compiler tools
-                with Mustang had stalled for many years. This is how JCI was born. JCI provided
-                what was missing from the JDK. And it provides it also for earlier versions.
-                The main author of JCI has later joined the EG and will make sure there is also
-                a bridge to the JSR199 API. 
+                Yes, it is now. JSR199 in the end brought the official java compiler tools that
+                now come with Mustang. Progress on this had stalled for many years. This is how
+                JCI was born. JCI provided what was missing from the JDK. And it still provides
+                it also for earlier versions. The main author of JCI has later on joined the EG
+                and will make sure there is a bridge to the JSR199 API. 
             </subsection>
             <subsection name="Doesn't JSR199 already deprecate JCI?">
                 Well, as said before ...there are no backports so far. And if you give the
@@ -20,15 +20,14 @@
             </subsection>
             <subsection name="How well tested is the code?">
                 Well, there are a couple of projects out there using this code already for
-                quite some time in production. Drools and Cocoon to name just a few know Open
+                quite some time in production. Drools and Cocoon to name just a few well known Open
                 Source projects. Code coverage is not bad at all ...but there still a few things
                 on the TODO list and contributions are always welcome.
             </subsection>
             <subsection name="Will the ... compiler be supported?">
-                There is always room for more. And if the compiler supports compilation to
-                java bytecode there is a good chance it can be added. There are currently
-                already a few candidates out there. But it all comes down to the need and
-                the time to implement.
+                There is always room for new implementations. And if the compiler supports compilation to
+                java bytecode, there is also a good chance it can be added. There are currently already a
+                few potential candidates out there. But it all comes down to the need and the time to implement.
             </subsection>
         </section>
     </body>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: svn commit: r529805 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site: site.xml xdoc/faq.xml

Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On 4/23/07, Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org> wrote:
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> > On 4/23/07, Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> tcurdt@apache.org wrote:
> >> > Author: tcurdt
> >> > Date: Tue Apr 17 16:46:08 2007
> >> > New Revision: 529805
> >> >
> >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=529805
> >> > Log:
> >> > rephrased a few o=paragraphs,
> >> > fixed broken links
> >> >
<snip/>
> >>
> >> This should not be necessary. If you use full URLs like this, you won't
> >> be able to navigate a locally built site correctly. What kind of
> >> problems did you run into? You stated "broken links" as the reason for
> >> the change in the commit message.
> >>
> > <snip/>
> >
> > Apparently, the site.xml "inheritance" does not tweak relative URLs as
> > needed (and expected).
> >
> > -Rahul
>
> So, the sub modules of jci are getting menu links that doesn't work?
>
<snap/>

Before, yes.

-Rahul


> --
> Dennis Lundberg
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: svn commit: r529805 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site: site.xml xdoc/faq.xml

Posted by Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>.
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 4/23/07, Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org> wrote:
>> tcurdt@apache.org wrote:
>> > Author: tcurdt
>> > Date: Tue Apr 17 16:46:08 2007
>> > New Revision: 529805
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=529805
>> > Log:
>> > rephrased a few o=paragraphs,
>> > fixed broken links
>> >
>> >
>> > Modified:
>> >     jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml
>> >     jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml
>> >
>> > Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml
>> > URL: 
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml?view=diff&rev=529805&r1=529804&r2=529805 
>>
>> > 
>> ============================================================================== 
>>
>> > --- jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml (original)
>> > +++ jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml Tue Apr 17 
>> 16:46:08 2007
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> > -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
>> > +<?xml version="1.0"?>
>> >  <project name="Jakarta Commons JCI">
>> >      <bannerRight>
>> >          <name>Jakarta Commons JCI</name>
>> > @@ -7,10 +7,10 @@
>> >      </bannerRight>
>> >      <body>
>> >          <menu name="Jakarta Commons JCI">
>> > -            <item name="About" href="index.html"/>
>> > -            <item name="Usage" href="usage.html"/>
>> > -            <item name="FAQ" href="faq.html"/>
>> > -            <item name="Downloads" href="downloads.html"/>
>> > +            <item name="About" 
>> href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/index.html"/>
>> > +            <item name="Usage" 
>> href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/usage.html"/>
>> > +            <item name="FAQ" 
>> href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/faq.html"/>
>> > +            <item name="Downloads" 
>> href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/downloads.html"/>
>>
>> This should not be necessary. If you use full URLs like this, you won't
>> be able to navigate a locally built site correctly. What kind of
>> problems did you run into? You stated "broken links" as the reason for
>> the change in the commit message.
>>
> <snip/>
> 
> Apparently, the site.xml "inheritance" does not tweak relative URLs as
> needed (and expected).
> 
> -Rahul

So, the sub modules of jci are getting menu links that doesn't work?

-- 
Dennis Lundberg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: svn commit: r529805 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site: site.xml xdoc/faq.xml

Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On 4/23/07, Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org> wrote:
> tcurdt@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: tcurdt
> > Date: Tue Apr 17 16:46:08 2007
> > New Revision: 529805
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=529805
> > Log:
> > rephrased a few o=paragraphs,
> > fixed broken links
> >
> >
> > Modified:
> >     jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml
> >     jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml
> >
> > Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml?view=diff&rev=529805&r1=529804&r2=529805
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml (original)
> > +++ jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml Tue Apr 17 16:46:08 2007
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
> > +<?xml version="1.0"?>
> >  <project name="Jakarta Commons JCI">
> >      <bannerRight>
> >          <name>Jakarta Commons JCI</name>
> > @@ -7,10 +7,10 @@
> >      </bannerRight>
> >      <body>
> >          <menu name="Jakarta Commons JCI">
> > -            <item name="About" href="index.html"/>
> > -            <item name="Usage" href="usage.html"/>
> > -            <item name="FAQ" href="faq.html"/>
> > -            <item name="Downloads" href="downloads.html"/>
> > +            <item name="About" href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/index.html"/>
> > +            <item name="Usage" href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/usage.html"/>
> > +            <item name="FAQ" href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/faq.html"/>
> > +            <item name="Downloads" href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/downloads.html"/>
>
> This should not be necessary. If you use full URLs like this, you won't
> be able to navigate a locally built site correctly. What kind of
> problems did you run into? You stated "broken links" as the reason for
> the change in the commit message.
>
<snip/>

Apparently, the site.xml "inheritance" does not tweak relative URLs as
needed (and expected).

-Rahul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: svn commit: r529805 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site: site.xml xdoc/faq.xml

Posted by Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>.
tcurdt@apache.org wrote:
> Author: tcurdt
> Date: Tue Apr 17 16:46:08 2007
> New Revision: 529805
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=529805
> Log:
> rephrased a few o=paragraphs,
> fixed broken links
> 
> 
> Modified:
>     jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml
>     jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml
> 
> Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml?view=diff&rev=529805&r1=529804&r2=529805
> ==============================================================================
> --- jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml (original)
> +++ jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/site.xml Tue Apr 17 16:46:08 2007
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
> +<?xml version="1.0"?>
>  <project name="Jakarta Commons JCI">
>      <bannerRight>
>          <name>Jakarta Commons JCI</name>
> @@ -7,10 +7,10 @@
>      </bannerRight>
>      <body>
>          <menu name="Jakarta Commons JCI">
> -            <item name="About" href="index.html"/>
> -            <item name="Usage" href="usage.html"/>
> -            <item name="FAQ" href="faq.html"/>
> -            <item name="Downloads" href="downloads.html"/>
> +            <item name="About" href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/index.html"/>
> +            <item name="Usage" href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/usage.html"/>
> +            <item name="FAQ" href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/faq.html"/>
> +            <item name="Downloads" href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jci/downloads.html"/>

This should not be necessary. If you use full URLs like this, you won't 
be able to navigate a locally built site correctly. What kind of 
problems did you run into? You stated "broken links" as the reason for 
the change in the commit message.

>          </menu>
>          <menu ref="modules"/>
>      </body>
> 
> Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml?view=diff&rev=529805&r1=529804&r2=529805
> ==============================================================================
> --- jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml (original)
> +++ jakarta/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml Tue Apr 17 16:46:08 2007
> @@ -7,11 +7,11 @@
>      <body>
>          <section name="FAQ">
>              <subsection name="Isn't compiler support integrated with Java6 (JSR199)?">
> -                Yes, it is now. JSR199 that in the end brought the official java compiler tools
> -                with Mustang had stalled for many years. This is how JCI was born. JCI provided
> -                what was missing from the JDK. And it provides it also for earlier versions.
> -                The main author of JCI has later joined the EG and will make sure there is also
> -                a bridge to the JSR199 API. 
> +                Yes, it is now. JSR199 in the end brought the official java compiler tools that
> +                now come with Mustang. Progress on this had stalled for many years. This is how
> +                JCI was born. JCI provided what was missing from the JDK. And it still provides
> +                it also for earlier versions. The main author of JCI has later on joined the EG
> +                and will make sure there is a bridge to the JSR199 API. 
>              </subsection>
>              <subsection name="Doesn't JSR199 already deprecate JCI?">
>                  Well, as said before ...there are no backports so far. And if you give the
> @@ -20,15 +20,14 @@
>              </subsection>
>              <subsection name="How well tested is the code?">
>                  Well, there are a couple of projects out there using this code already for
> -                quite some time in production. Drools and Cocoon to name just a few know Open
> +                quite some time in production. Drools and Cocoon to name just a few well known Open
>                  Source projects. Code coverage is not bad at all ...but there still a few things
>                  on the TODO list and contributions are always welcome.
>              </subsection>
>              <subsection name="Will the ... compiler be supported?">
> -                There is always room for more. And if the compiler supports compilation to
> -                java bytecode there is a good chance it can be added. There are currently
> -                already a few candidates out there. But it all comes down to the need and
> -                the time to implement.
> +                There is always room for new implementations. And if the compiler supports compilation to
> +                java bytecode, there is also a good chance it can be added. There are currently already a
> +                few potential candidates out there. But it all comes down to the need and the time to implement.
>              </subsection>
>          </section>
>      </body>
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 


-- 
Dennis Lundberg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org