You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@httpd.apache.org by fREW Schmidt <fr...@gmail.com> on 2012/03/28 17:13:13 UTC
[users@httpd] removal of mod_mem_cache in 2.4
Hey guys,
We're doing what we can to upgrade from 2.2.22 to 2.4.1 and (obviously)
I noticed that mod_mem_cache has been removed with the recommendation
to use mod_cache_disk instead. I found this:
http://blog.monitis.com/index.php/2011/07/05/25-apache-performance-tuning-tips/
which I'm guessing is the reason why; to reiterate, basically the mem cache
is not as good as the disk cache because the cache isn't effectively shared.
Is this correct? I'm just curious.
--
fREW Schmidt
http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] removal of mod_mem_cache in 2.4
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:13 AM, fREW Schmidt <fr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> We're doing what we can to upgrade from 2.2.22 to 2.4.1 and (obviously)
> I noticed that mod_mem_cache has been removed with the recommendation
> to use mod_cache_disk instead. I found this:
>
> http://blog.monitis.com/index.php/2011/07/05/25-apache-performance-tuning-tips/
>
> which I'm guessing is the reason why; to reiterate, basically the mem cache
> is not as good as the disk cache because the cache isn't effectively shared.
>
> Is this correct? I'm just curious.
IIRC, It's also considered over-complicated and has other limitations
(only one variant for each resource at a time).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org