You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by kf...@collab.net on 2003/09/19 20:00:29 UTC

Re: [Issue 1525] New - Use new "entity ID" notion instead of "committed rev"

"Glenn A. Thompson" <gt...@cdr.net> writes:
> So is it safe to assume that this will change those internal dav URLs
> nobody should be using:-)?

Hiya, Glen!

Well, I think the vsn-rsrc-urls will start being constructed with the
new IDs, but they'd still be "offically" black boxes private to dav.

> At the FS level, would revision roots be constructed from the entity
> ID not the rev number? Or is this in addition to revision roots?

I think this is unrelated to revision roots, which are still useful
for what they do.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: [Issue 1525] New - Use new "entity ID" notion instead of "committed rev"

Posted by "Glenn A. Thompson" <gt...@cdr.net>.

C.Michael Pilato wrote:

>kfogel@collab.net writes:
>
>  
>
>>"Glenn A. Thompson" <gt...@cdr.net> writes:
>>    
>>
>>>So is it safe to assume that this will change those internal dav URLs
>>>nobody should be using:-)?
>>>      
>>>
>>Hiya, Glen!
>>
Hey.  Yeah I'm still out here.  Sorry to be so useless.  I'm just super 
busy.   I can't tell you how many times I've said to my partners: "Hey 
after this, do you think I can do some Subversion work?"  But like 
everyone, I have to pay the bills.  On a clear day, if I look up, I can 
just barely see the top of my mortgage:-)

>>
>>Well, I think the vsn-rsrc-urls will start being constructed with the
>>new IDs, but they'd still be "offically" black boxes private to dav.
>>    
>>
>
>I actually don't think we'd mess with the vsn-rsrc-url format.  But
>that discussion can be held in another lifetime.
>
OK, I thought this might be a way to increase their stability.  I seem 
to remember that being a major issue a while back.
I'll a little out of touch with Subversion.  Or a lot:-)

gat


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: [Issue 1525] New - Use new "entity ID" notion instead of "committed rev"

Posted by "C.Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net>.
kfogel@collab.net writes:

> "Glenn A. Thompson" <gt...@cdr.net> writes:
> > So is it safe to assume that this will change those internal dav URLs
> > nobody should be using:-)?
> 
> Hiya, Glen!
> 
> Well, I think the vsn-rsrc-urls will start being constructed with the
> new IDs, but they'd still be "offically" black boxes private to dav.

I actually don't think we'd mess with the vsn-rsrc-url format.  But
that discussion can be held in another lifetime.

> > At the FS level, would revision roots be constructed from the entity
> > ID not the rev number? Or is this in addition to revision roots?
> 
> I think this is unrelated to revision roots, which are still useful
> for what they do.

Definitely unrelated.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org