You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Adela Maznikar (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/04/04 21:12:19 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-10910) [89-fb] Change get(List) to batchGet(List)

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Adela Maznikar reassigned HBASE-10910:
--------------------------------------

    Assignee: Adela Maznikar

> [89-fb] Change get(List<Get>) to batchGet(List<Get>)
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10910
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10910
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Client
>    Affects Versions: 0.89-fb
>            Reporter: Adela Maznikar
>            Assignee: Adela Maznikar
>             Fix For: 0.89-fb
>
>
> batchGet(List<Get>) is more performant since it splits the list of Gets on regionserver level, and get(List<Get>) does that on region level. 
> If we have a list of gets for regions on a same regionserver, get(List<Get>) will do #regions rpc calls and batchGet(List<Get>) will do just one rpc call. 
> Changing HTable.get(List<Get>) to internally call HTable.batchGet(List<Get>)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)