[WWW] Convention for images and logos

[Alexandro Colorado <jz...@oooes.org>]

Dave has been updating the cWiki for conventions about the relationship
between some of the image files as well as address orphan sites on the
www-site root level.

This clean up is important, however the core proposal is to have a more
uniform convention on the file name.

I wrote some proposed conventions, I would like to get some
approval/comment on these, or overhead agreement why this is/isn't
necessary.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/File+handling+proposal+for+logos+and+graphics#New+conventions
​
​

-- 
Alexandro Colorado
Apache OpenOffice Contributor
http://www.openoffice.org

Re: [WWW] Convention for images and logos

[Alexandro Colorado <jz...@oooes.org>]

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Alexandro Colorado <jz...@oooes.org> wrote:
> > Dave has been updating the cWiki for conventions about the relationship
> > between some of the image files as well as address orphan sites on the
> > www-site root level.
> >
> > This clean up is important, however the core proposal is to have a more
> > uniform convention on the file name.
> >
>
> Is the cleanup important?   Is the idea that it will make maintenance
> easier?   This is certainly possible.  But it is also possible to
> break things in the short term.
>

> So I wonder:   Is there any easy way to test the entire website, all
> www.openoffice.org, for broken links?  It might be good to do this
> test now, before the cleanup, and then repeat again after the cleanup,
> so we can diff the two lists to see what broke.
>

​There are all kinds of scripts to perform this tasks ssuch as linkchecker
and others. However the point is to introduce conventions, so the first
point is to agree on such.​



>
> In fact, having a list of broken links in general would be good.
>
> -Rob
>
> > I wrote some proposed conventions, I would like to get some
> > approval/comment on these, or overhead agreement why this is/isn't
> > necessary.
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/File+handling+proposal+for+logos+and+graphics#New+conventions
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexandro Colorado
> > Apache OpenOffice Contributor
> > http://www.openoffice.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Alexandro Colorado
Apache OpenOffice Contributor
http://www.openoffice.org

Re: [WWW] Convention for images and logos

[Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>]

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Alexandro Colorado <jz...@oooes.org> wrote:
> Dave has been updating the cWiki for conventions about the relationship
> between some of the image files as well as address orphan sites on the
> www-site root level.
>
> This clean up is important, however the core proposal is to have a more
> uniform convention on the file name.
>

Is the cleanup important?   Is the idea that it will make maintenance
easier?   This is certainly possible.  But it is also possible to
break things in the short term.

So I wonder:   Is there any easy way to test the entire website, all
www.openoffice.org, for broken links?  It might be good to do this
test now, before the cleanup, and then repeat again after the cleanup,
so we can diff the two lists to see what broke.

In fact, having a list of broken links in general would be good.

-Rob

> I wrote some proposed conventions, I would like to get some
> approval/comment on these, or overhead agreement why this is/isn't
> necessary.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/File+handling+proposal+for+logos+and+graphics#New+conventions
>
>
>
> --
> Alexandro Colorado
> Apache OpenOffice Contributor
> http://www.openoffice.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org