You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tika.apache.org by Tilman Hausherr <TH...@t-online.de> on 2022/06/24 03:29:04 UTC

remove jdk14 build from ci

I propose to remove the jdk14 build job. Reason: I think it's enough to 
keep the lowest (8) and the highest (17, I just changed it to 18) build, 
intermediate versions won't bring any surprises. Keeping jdk14 is a 
waste of energy.

Same argument for tika-branch1x-jdk11 .

Tilman

Re: remove jdk14 build from ci

Posted by Tilman Hausherr <TH...@t-online.de>.

Am 24.06.2022 um 11:23 schrieb Tim Allison:
> +1 on jdk14
>
> We still want to make sure that branch_1x still works with at least jdk8
> and jdk11?

Yes we want hat all work; my thought is to remove the intermediate 
versions while keeping the extremes.

Tilman



>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:29 PM Tilman Hausherr <TH...@t-online.de>
> wrote:
>
>> I propose to remove the jdk14 build job. Reason: I think it's enough to
>> keep the lowest (8) and the highest (17, I just changed it to 18) build,
>> intermediate versions won't bring any surprises. Keeping jdk14 is a
>> waste of energy.
>>
>> Same argument for tika-branch1x-jdk11 .
>>
>> Tilman
>>
>>

Re: remove jdk14 build from ci

Posted by Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org>.

+1 on jdk14

We still want to make sure that branch_1x still works with at least jdk8
and jdk11?

On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:29 PM Tilman Hausherr <TH...@t-online.de>
wrote:

> I propose to remove the jdk14 build job. Reason: I think it's enough to
> keep the lowest (8) and the highest (17, I just changed it to 18) build,
> intermediate versions won't bring any surprises. Keeping jdk14 is a
> waste of energy.
>
> Same argument for tika-branch1x-jdk11 .
>
> Tilman
>
>