You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@crail.apache.org by Jonas Pfefferle <pe...@japf.ch> on 2018/10/22 13:27:08 UTC
[VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc2]
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Crail 1.1-incubating, release
candidate rc2.
The source and binary tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/1.1-rc2/
The commit to be voted upon:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=commit;h=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061
The Nexus Staging URL:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecrail-1001/
Release artifacts are signed with the key AA557B11:
https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/crail/KEYS
For information about the contents of this release, see:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=blob;f=HISTORY.md;h=86e1b5a39d3a13f1cca2621677057763fdf9ac96;hb=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061
or for better readability
https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/blob/v1.1-rc2/HISTORY.md
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
The vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
Thanks,
Jonas
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Animesh Trivedi <an...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Jonas for preparing this release:
- checked checksum (binary and source)
- checked signature (binary and source)
- rat check on source
- built from source
+1 from my side.
Cheers,
--
Animesh
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:06 AM Adrian Schuepbach <DR...@zurich.ibm.com>
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> My vote is +1.
>
> I looked at the source and binary tarballs. Looks fine to me.
>
> Thanks
> Adrian
>
>
>
>
> From: "Jonas Pfefferle" <pe...@japf.ch>
> To: "dev@crail.apache.org" <de...@crail.apache.org>
> Date: 10/22/2018 03:28 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc2]
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Crail 1.1-incubating,
> release
> candidate rc2.
>
> The source and binary tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/1.1-rc2/
>
>
> The commit to be voted upon:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=commit;h=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061
>
>
> The Nexus Staging URL:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecrail-1001/
>
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the key AA557B11:
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/crail/KEYS
>
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=blob;f=HISTORY.md;h=86e1b5a39d3a13f1cca2621677057763fdf9ac96;hb=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061
>
> or for better readability
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/blob/v1.1-rc2/HISTORY.md
>
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> Thanks,
> Jonas
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Patrick Stuedi <ps...@gmail.com>.
checksum and signatures checked. builds from source.
+1
Thanks Jonas and Animesh for preparing the release.
-Patrick
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:06 AM Adrian Schuepbach <DR...@zurich.ibm.com>
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> My vote is +1.
>
> I looked at the source and binary tarballs. Looks fine to me.
>
> Thanks
> Adrian
>
>
>
>
> From: "Jonas Pfefferle" <pe...@japf.ch>
> To: "dev@crail.apache.org" <de...@crail.apache.org>
> Date: 10/22/2018 03:28 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc2]
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Crail 1.1-incubating,
> release
> candidate rc2.
>
> The source and binary tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/1.1-rc2/
>
>
> The commit to be voted upon:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=commit;h=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061
>
>
> The Nexus Staging URL:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecrail-1001/
>
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the key AA557B11:
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/crail/KEYS
>
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=blob;f=HISTORY.md;h=86e1b5a39d3a13f1cca2621677057763fdf9ac96;hb=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061
>
> or for better readability
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/blob/v1.1-rc2/HISTORY.md
>
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> Thanks,
> Jonas
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Adrian Schuepbach <DR...@zurich.ibm.com>.
Hi all
My vote is +1.
I looked at the source and binary tarballs. Looks fine to me.
Thanks
Adrian
From: "Jonas Pfefferle" <pe...@japf.ch>
To: "dev@crail.apache.org" <de...@crail.apache.org>
Date: 10/22/2018 03:28 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc2]
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Crail 1.1-incubating,
release
candidate rc2.
The source and binary tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/1.1-rc2/
The commit to be voted upon:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=commit;h=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061
The Nexus Staging URL:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecrail-1001/
Release artifacts are signed with the key AA557B11:
https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/crail/KEYS
For information about the contents of this release, see:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=blob;f=HISTORY.md;h=86e1b5a39d3a13f1cca2621677057763fdf9ac96;hb=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061
or for better readability
https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/blob/v1.1-rc2/HISTORY.md
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
The vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
Thanks,
Jonas
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Jonas Pfefferle <pe...@japf.ch>.
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 21:13:53 -0700
Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> Regarding binary artifacts. I really don’t know how to review them.
>I started a discussion thread on general@incubator[1].
>
>> I don't think it is feasible to put license headers in each rst
>>file. I checked multiple other projects
>> and non of them do this, that is why I excluded the doc directory.
>
> CouchDB uses the “..” syntax. See [2].
Ok. We will add the license to all the rst files and revert the rat
excludes.
>
>> We switched to the Apache parent pom for the release and have not
>>figured out yet how to fix the naming and some other issues, but we
>>have opened a JIRA to investigate:
>>https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/CRAIL/issues/CRAIL-56
>
>
> We solved this one in Calcite. I’ve added comments to the JIRA case.
Thanks, we will take a look and implement the changes for the next rc.
>
>> Our new documentation (linked in the readme and on the webpage)
>>talks about how to build Crail:
>> https://incubator-crail.readthedocs.io/en/latest/source.html
>> Or do you want this to be part of the call for vote email?
>
> Definitely not in the vote email - it’s not for my benefit, it’s for
>whoever downloads the source tarball.
>
> I see now that there’s a line in README.md, "Please check out the
>documentation for information about how to deploy, run, test and
>program against Crail”. Sorry I missed it.
>
> Julian
>
> [1]
>https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ceb357513ff0403414b5fff7dbeb1ea43961e71f9e48425d6e3cea8f@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
><https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ceb357513ff0403414b5fff7dbeb1ea43961e71f9e48425d6e3cea8f@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E>
>
> [2]
>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/couchdb-documentation/master/src/intro/why.rst
><https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/couchdb-documentation/master/src/intro/why.rst>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
Regarding binary artifacts. I really don’t know how to review them. I started a discussion thread on general@incubator[1].
> I don't think it is feasible to put license headers in each rst file. I checked multiple other projects
> and non of them do this, that is why I excluded the doc directory.
CouchDB uses the “..” syntax. See [2].
> We switched to the Apache parent pom for the release and have not figured out yet how to fix the naming and some other issues, but we have opened a JIRA to investigate: https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/CRAIL/issues/CRAIL-56
We solved this one in Calcite. I’ve added comments to the JIRA case.
> Our new documentation (linked in the readme and on the webpage) talks about how to build Crail:
> https://incubator-crail.readthedocs.io/en/latest/source.html
> Or do you want this to be part of the call for vote email?
Definitely not in the vote email - it’s not for my benefit, it’s for whoever downloads the source tarball.
I see now that there’s a line in README.md, "Please check out the documentation for information about how to deploy, run, test and program against Crail”. Sorry I missed it.
Julian
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ceb357513ff0403414b5fff7dbeb1ea43961e71f9e48425d6e3cea8f@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ceb357513ff0403414b5fff7dbeb1ea43961e71f9e48425d6e3cea8f@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E>
[2] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/couchdb-documentation/master/src/intro/why.rst <https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/couchdb-documentation/master/src/intro/why.rst>
[CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Jonas Pfefferle <pe...@japf.ch>.
All,
I'm canceling the vote for Apache Crail 1.1-incubating release candidate 2,
due to found issues (see below).
I will prepare a new release candidate.
Regards,
Jonas
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:26:34 +0200
"Jonas Pfefferle" <pe...@japf.ch> wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
>
> Comments inline.
>
> Thanks,
> Jonas
>
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:33:41 -0700
> Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>> -1 (binding) due to missing build instructions and included binary
>>files
>>
>> Other reviewers please take note: this is the first release to
>>include binary artifacts. 1.0 only included a src.tar.gz, whereas
>>this also has a bin.tar.gz. I have no clue how to review binary
>>artifacts. Should they even be included in a release vote?
>
> We did not come up with this. I've checked multiple other Apache
>projects that do it like this.
>
>>
>> Downloaded, checked signatures, LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER;
>>successfully built on Linux JDK 8 using “mvn -DskipTests install”;
>>successfully ran RAT.
>>
>> Checked that contents of the src.tar.gz match git at the same
>>commit:
>>
>> $ diff -r . ~/open1/crail/
>> Only in .: DEPENDENCIES
>> Only in ./doc: build
>> Only in ./doc/source: _static
>> Only in /home/jhyde/open1/crail/: .git
>>
>> The doc/build directory is a concern, as it contains binary .doctree
>>files. Remove it?
>
> Yes, that is an over site. The git repository does not include the
>build directory and _static as it should be.
> I will remove it in the src tarball and create a new rc.
>
>>
>> Related to the previous point, you’ve excluded doc/ from RAT
>>checking. Why? If RAT were enabled, it would have noticed the binary
>>files.
>
> I don't think it is feasible to put license headers in each rst
>file. I checked multiple other projects
> and non of them do this, that is why I excluded the doc directory. I
>will modify the rule to only exclude rst files.
>
>>
>> The directory prefix in src.tar.gz is crail-parent-1.1-incubating.
>>It would be better if it matched the release name, i.e.
>>apache-crail-1.1-incubating-src. It did in 1.0-rc3, so I’m not sure
>>why we’ve regressed.
>
> We switched to the Apache parent pom for the release and have not
>figured out yet how to fix the naming and some other issues, but we
>have opened a JIRA to investigate:
>https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/CRAIL/issues/CRAIL-56
>
>
>> There are no build instructions. I gave you a pass in the last
>>release[1] but we need them now.
>
> Our new documentation (linked in the readme and on the webpage)
>talks about how to build Crail:
> https://incubator-crail.readthedocs.io/en/latest/source.html
> Or do you want this to be part of the call for vote email?
>
>>
>> Julian
>>
>> [1]
>>https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7c3dc2c6ea1d2ac2550b7b6937d4f29965f0eb418bb92e296556df9e@%3Cdev.crail.apache.org%3E
>><https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7c3dc2c6ea1d2ac2550b7b6937d4f29965f0eb418bb92e296556df9e@%3Cdev.crail.apache.org%3E>
>>> On Oct 23, 2018, at 8:00 AM, bernard metzler <bm...@gmx.ch>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jonas,
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for preparing that release candidate!
>>>
>>> I built from source and installed and test-ran Crail
>>> both from built source and binary download. Looks
>>> all pretty good to me!
>>>
>>> +1 from my side
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Bernard.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/22/2018 15:27, Jonas Pfefferle wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Crail 1.1-incubating,
>>>>release candidate rc2.
>>>> The source and binary tarball, including signatures, digests, etc.
>>>>can be found at:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/1.1-rc2/
>>>> The commit to be voted upon:
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=commit;h=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061
>>>> The Nexus Staging URL:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecrail-1001/
>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the key AA557B11:
>>>> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/crail/KEYS
>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=blob;f=HISTORY.md;h=86e1b5a39d3a13f1cca2621677057763fdf9ac96;hb=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061
>>>>or for better readability
>>>>https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/blob/v1.1-rc2/HISTORY.md
>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jonas
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Jonas Pfefferle <pe...@japf.ch>.
Hi Julian,
Comments inline.
Thanks,
Jonas
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:33:41 -0700
Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> -1 (binding) due to missing build instructions and included binary
>files
>
> Other reviewers please take note: this is the first release to
>include binary artifacts. 1.0 only included a src.tar.gz, whereas
>this also has a bin.tar.gz. I have no clue how to review binary
>artifacts. Should they even be included in a release vote?
We did not come up with this. I've checked multiple other Apache projects
that do it like this.
>
> Downloaded, checked signatures, LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER;
>successfully built on Linux JDK 8 using “mvn -DskipTests install”;
>successfully ran RAT.
>
> Checked that contents of the src.tar.gz match git at the same
>commit:
>
> $ diff -r . ~/open1/crail/
> Only in .: DEPENDENCIES
> Only in ./doc: build
> Only in ./doc/source: _static
> Only in /home/jhyde/open1/crail/: .git
>
> The doc/build directory is a concern, as it contains binary .doctree
>files. Remove it?
Yes, that is an over site. The git repository does not include the build
directory and _static as it should be.
I will remove it in the src tarball and create a new rc.
>
> Related to the previous point, you’ve excluded doc/ from RAT
>checking. Why? If RAT were enabled, it would have noticed the binary
>files.
I don't think it is feasible to put license headers in each rst file. I
checked multiple other projects
and non of them do this, that is why I excluded the doc directory. I will
modify the rule to only exclude rst files.
>
> The directory prefix in src.tar.gz is crail-parent-1.1-incubating.
>It would be better if it matched the release name, i.e.
>apache-crail-1.1-incubating-src. It did in 1.0-rc3, so I’m not sure
>why we’ve regressed.
We switched to the Apache parent pom for the release and have not figured
out yet how to fix the naming and some other issues, but we have opened a
JIRA to investigate:
https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/CRAIL/issues/CRAIL-56
>
> There are no build instructions. I gave you a pass in the last
>release[1] but we need them now.
Our new documentation (linked in the readme and on the webpage) talks about
how to build Crail:
https://incubator-crail.readthedocs.io/en/latest/source.html
Or do you want this to be part of the call for vote email?
>
> Julian
>
> [1]
>https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7c3dc2c6ea1d2ac2550b7b6937d4f29965f0eb418bb92e296556df9e@%3Cdev.crail.apache.org%3E
><https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7c3dc2c6ea1d2ac2550b7b6937d4f29965f0eb418bb92e296556df9e@%3Cdev.crail.apache.org%3E>
>
>> On Oct 23, 2018, at 8:00 AM, bernard metzler <bm...@gmx.ch>
>>wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jonas,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for preparing that release candidate!
>>
>> I built from source and installed and test-ran Crail
>> both from built source and binary download. Looks
>> all pretty good to me!
>>
>> +1 from my side
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bernard.
>>
>>
>> On 10/22/2018 15:27, Jonas Pfefferle wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Crail 1.1-incubating,
>>>release candidate rc2.
>>> The source and binary tarball, including signatures, digests, etc.
>>>can be found at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/1.1-rc2/
>>> The commit to be voted upon:
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=commit;h=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061
>>> The Nexus Staging URL:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecrail-1001/
>>> Release artifacts are signed with the key AA557B11:
>>> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/crail/KEYS
>>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=blob;f=HISTORY.md;h=86e1b5a39d3a13f1cca2621677057763fdf9ac96;hb=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061
>>>or for better readability
>>>https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/blob/v1.1-rc2/HISTORY.md
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jonas
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc2]
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>.
-1 (binding) due to missing build instructions and included binary files
Other reviewers please take note: this is the first release to include binary artifacts. 1.0 only included a src.tar.gz, whereas this also has a bin.tar.gz. I have no clue how to review binary artifacts. Should they even be included in a release vote?
Downloaded, checked signatures, LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER; successfully built on Linux JDK 8 using “mvn -DskipTests install”; successfully ran RAT.
Checked that contents of the src.tar.gz match git at the same commit:
$ diff -r . ~/open1/crail/
Only in .: DEPENDENCIES
Only in ./doc: build
Only in ./doc/source: _static
Only in /home/jhyde/open1/crail/: .git
The doc/build directory is a concern, as it contains binary .doctree files. Remove it?
Related to the previous point, you’ve excluded doc/ from RAT checking. Why? If RAT were enabled, it would have noticed the binary files.
The directory prefix in src.tar.gz is crail-parent-1.1-incubating. It would be better if it matched the release name, i.e. apache-crail-1.1-incubating-src. It did in 1.0-rc3, so I’m not sure why we’ve regressed.
There are no build instructions. I gave you a pass in the last release[1] but we need them now.
Julian
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7c3dc2c6ea1d2ac2550b7b6937d4f29965f0eb418bb92e296556df9e@%3Cdev.crail.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7c3dc2c6ea1d2ac2550b7b6937d4f29965f0eb418bb92e296556df9e@%3Cdev.crail.apache.org%3E>
> On Oct 23, 2018, at 8:00 AM, bernard metzler <bm...@gmx.ch> wrote:
>
> Hi Jonas,
>
> Thanks a lot for preparing that release candidate!
>
> I built from source and installed and test-ran Crail
> both from built source and binary download. Looks
> all pretty good to me!
>
> +1 from my side
>
> Cheers,
> Bernard.
>
>
> On 10/22/2018 15:27, Jonas Pfefferle wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Crail 1.1-incubating, release candidate rc2.
>> The source and binary tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/1.1-rc2/
>> The commit to be voted upon:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=commit;h=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061
>> The Nexus Staging URL:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecrail-1001/
>> Release artifacts are signed with the key AA557B11:
>> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/crail/KEYS
>> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=blob;f=HISTORY.md;h=86e1b5a39d3a13f1cca2621677057763fdf9ac96;hb=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061 or for better readability https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/blob/v1.1-rc2/HISTORY.md
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> Thanks,
>> Jonas
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc2]
Posted by bernard metzler <bm...@gmx.ch>.
Hi Jonas,
Thanks a lot for preparing that release candidate!
I built from source and installed and test-ran Crail
both from built source and binary download. Looks
all pretty good to me!
+1 from my side
Cheers,
Bernard.
On 10/22/2018 15:27, Jonas Pfefferle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Crail 1.1-incubating, release candidate rc2.
>
> The source and binary tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/1.1-rc2/
>
> The commit to be voted upon:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=commit;h=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061
>
> The Nexus Staging URL:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecrail-1001/
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the key AA557B11:
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/crail/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=blob;f=HISTORY.md;h=86e1b5a39d3a13f1cca2621677057763fdf9ac96;hb=2b75c4c47e2491c860079e1be985b6767f226061
>
> or for better readability https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/blob/v1.1-rc2/HISTORY.md
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> Thanks,
> Jonas
>
>