You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by lu...@free.fr on 2008/02/01 13:24:24 UTC
[math] going towards 1.2 release ?
Hello,
Their have been lot of work done recently on [math]. The last bugs have been
fixed and should be closed in Jira soon.
What about preparing 1.2 release ?
Luc
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [math] going towards 1.2 release ?
Posted by Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com>.
On 2/1/08, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 11:55 PM, Luc Maisonobe <Lu...@free.fr> wrote:
> > sebb a écrit :
> > > On 01/02/2008, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 AM, <lu...@free.fr> wrote:
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>>
> > >>> Their have been lot of work done recently on [math]. The last bugs have been
> > >>> fixed and should be closed in Jira soon.
> > >>>
> > >>> What about preparing 1.2 release ?
> > >>>
> > >> Good idea. I will finish the last bits on the Anova addition and some
> > >> other cleanup I wanted to do this weekend and roll a RC, after
> > >> updating the release plan to drop a couple of things (e.g. repackaging
> > >> the analysis package - after thinking more about this and observing
> > >> the lingering effects that a similar move had on [collections], I
> > >> think we should leave as is).
> > >>
> > >> There could be some things related to deprecating abstract factories
> > >> uniformly or cleaning up solvers, improving documentation for analysis
> > >> package that may derail things - patches welcome! - but I will try to
> > >> slug through enough of it this weekend to get an RC out. Because m2
> > >> is going to present some challenges, I will take the "old style" RC =
> > >> RC approach so we can iterate to a final.
> > >>
> > >> Phil
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > Just run Findbugs on the code; I'll post a JIRA with the findings (not many).
> > >
> > > SVN includes some source under mantissa - is this obsolete, or a work
> > > in progress? It does not compile (e.g.
> > > org.spaceroots.mantissa.estimation package is missing), and is not
> > > included in the M2 build.
> >
> > It is part of a code base progressively integrated into [math]. For this
> > version, the ode, estimation, geometry and optimization packages as well
> > as a few classes from the random package have been moved from mantissa
> > to [math]. What is left in the directory will be reduced further as
> > other packages are included in future releases. The final leftover will
> > be dropped. So this directory should be considered an internal base for
> > developpers only, it is not part of the release.
> >
> > >
> > > Also, Junit for Java 1.3 is now at 3.8.2; might as well update the build?
> >
> > Yes. I'll update the pom file.
> >
> > >
> > > It would be useful to include a simple "how to build" document in SVN
> > > (and on the web-site).
> >
> > Sure. Should we be consistent with some document shared accross all
> > commons projects or should we write something ourselves ? I think we are
> > similar to other projects, currently switching from maven 1 to maven 2.
>
> A number of components have "building" pages that are vaguely similar,
> but I don't think theres consistency - if you want something to start
> with I updated Commons IO's building page for maven2 recently:
>
> http://commons.apache.org/io/building.html
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/io/trunk/xdocs/building.xml
>
We actually have such a page in [math]
http://commons.apache.org/math/developers.html
which needs to be updated. Add to release todo list :-(
Phil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [math] going towards 1.2 release ?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 02/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 11:55 PM, Luc Maisonobe <Lu...@free.fr> wrote:
> > sebb a écrit :
> > > On 01/02/2008, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 AM, <lu...@free.fr> wrote:
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>>
> > >>> Their have been lot of work done recently on [math]. The last bugs have been
> > >>> fixed and should be closed in Jira soon.
> > >>>
> > >>> What about preparing 1.2 release ?
> > >>>
> > >> Good idea. I will finish the last bits on the Anova addition and some
> > >> other cleanup I wanted to do this weekend and roll a RC, after
> > >> updating the release plan to drop a couple of things (e.g. repackaging
> > >> the analysis package - after thinking more about this and observing
> > >> the lingering effects that a similar move had on [collections], I
> > >> think we should leave as is).
> > >>
> > >> There could be some things related to deprecating abstract factories
> > >> uniformly or cleaning up solvers, improving documentation for analysis
> > >> package that may derail things - patches welcome! - but I will try to
> > >> slug through enough of it this weekend to get an RC out. Because m2
> > >> is going to present some challenges, I will take the "old style" RC =
> > >> RC approach so we can iterate to a final.
> > >>
> > >> Phil
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > Just run Findbugs on the code; I'll post a JIRA with the findings (not many).
> > >
> > > SVN includes some source under mantissa - is this obsolete, or a work
> > > in progress? It does not compile (e.g.
> > > org.spaceroots.mantissa.estimation package is missing), and is not
> > > included in the M2 build.
> >
> > It is part of a code base progressively integrated into [math]. For this
> > version, the ode, estimation, geometry and optimization packages as well
> > as a few classes from the random package have been moved from mantissa
> > to [math]. What is left in the directory will be reduced further as
> > other packages are included in future releases. The final leftover will
> > be dropped. So this directory should be considered an internal base for
> > developpers only, it is not part of the release.
> >
OK.
> > >
> > > Also, Junit for Java 1.3 is now at 3.8.2; might as well update the build?
> >
> > Yes. I'll update the pom file.
> >
> > >
> > > It would be useful to include a simple "how to build" document in SVN
> > > (and on the web-site).
> >
> > Sure. Should we be consistent with some document shared accross all
> > commons projects or should we write something ourselves ? I think we are
> > similar to other projects, currently switching from maven 1 to maven 2.
>
> A number of components have "building" pages that are vaguely similar,
> but I don't think theres consistency - if you want something to start
> with I updated Commons IO's building page for maven2 recently:
>
> http://commons.apache.org/io/building.html
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/io/trunk/xdocs/building.xml
>
It would be useful to have a brief BUILDING.txt file or similar in the
source archive.
It could reference the web-site for the additional details.
> Niall
>
> > Luc
> >
> >
> > >
> > >>> Luc
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [math] going towards 1.2 release ?
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 1, 2008 11:55 PM, Luc Maisonobe <Lu...@free.fr> wrote:
> sebb a écrit :
> > On 01/02/2008, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 AM, <lu...@free.fr> wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Their have been lot of work done recently on [math]. The last bugs have been
> >>> fixed and should be closed in Jira soon.
> >>>
> >>> What about preparing 1.2 release ?
> >>>
> >> Good idea. I will finish the last bits on the Anova addition and some
> >> other cleanup I wanted to do this weekend and roll a RC, after
> >> updating the release plan to drop a couple of things (e.g. repackaging
> >> the analysis package - after thinking more about this and observing
> >> the lingering effects that a similar move had on [collections], I
> >> think we should leave as is).
> >>
> >> There could be some things related to deprecating abstract factories
> >> uniformly or cleaning up solvers, improving documentation for analysis
> >> package that may derail things - patches welcome! - but I will try to
> >> slug through enough of it this weekend to get an RC out. Because m2
> >> is going to present some challenges, I will take the "old style" RC =
> >> RC approach so we can iterate to a final.
> >>
> >> Phil
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Just run Findbugs on the code; I'll post a JIRA with the findings (not many).
> >
> > SVN includes some source under mantissa - is this obsolete, or a work
> > in progress? It does not compile (e.g.
> > org.spaceroots.mantissa.estimation package is missing), and is not
> > included in the M2 build.
>
> It is part of a code base progressively integrated into [math]. For this
> version, the ode, estimation, geometry and optimization packages as well
> as a few classes from the random package have been moved from mantissa
> to [math]. What is left in the directory will be reduced further as
> other packages are included in future releases. The final leftover will
> be dropped. So this directory should be considered an internal base for
> developpers only, it is not part of the release.
>
> >
> > Also, Junit for Java 1.3 is now at 3.8.2; might as well update the build?
>
> Yes. I'll update the pom file.
>
> >
> > It would be useful to include a simple "how to build" document in SVN
> > (and on the web-site).
>
> Sure. Should we be consistent with some document shared accross all
> commons projects or should we write something ourselves ? I think we are
> similar to other projects, currently switching from maven 1 to maven 2.
A number of components have "building" pages that are vaguely similar,
but I don't think theres consistency - if you want something to start
with I updated Commons IO's building page for maven2 recently:
http://commons.apache.org/io/building.html
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/io/trunk/xdocs/building.xml
Niall
> Luc
>
>
> >
> >>> Luc
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [math] going towards 1.2 release ?
Posted by Luc Maisonobe <Lu...@free.fr>.
sebb a écrit :
> On 01/02/2008, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 AM, <lu...@free.fr> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Their have been lot of work done recently on [math]. The last bugs have been
>>> fixed and should be closed in Jira soon.
>>>
>>> What about preparing 1.2 release ?
>>>
>> Good idea. I will finish the last bits on the Anova addition and some
>> other cleanup I wanted to do this weekend and roll a RC, after
>> updating the release plan to drop a couple of things (e.g. repackaging
>> the analysis package - after thinking more about this and observing
>> the lingering effects that a similar move had on [collections], I
>> think we should leave as is).
>>
>> There could be some things related to deprecating abstract factories
>> uniformly or cleaning up solvers, improving documentation for analysis
>> package that may derail things - patches welcome! - but I will try to
>> slug through enough of it this weekend to get an RC out. Because m2
>> is going to present some challenges, I will take the "old style" RC =
>> RC approach so we can iterate to a final.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>>
>
> Just run Findbugs on the code; I'll post a JIRA with the findings (not many).
>
> SVN includes some source under mantissa - is this obsolete, or a work
> in progress? It does not compile (e.g.
> org.spaceroots.mantissa.estimation package is missing), and is not
> included in the M2 build.
It is part of a code base progressively integrated into [math]. For this
version, the ode, estimation, geometry and optimization packages as well
as a few classes from the random package have been moved from mantissa
to [math]. What is left in the directory will be reduced further as
other packages are included in future releases. The final leftover will
be dropped. So this directory should be considered an internal base for
developpers only, it is not part of the release.
>
> Also, Junit for Java 1.3 is now at 3.8.2; might as well update the build?
Yes. I'll update the pom file.
>
> It would be useful to include a simple "how to build" document in SVN
> (and on the web-site).
Sure. Should we be consistent with some document shared accross all
commons projects or should we write something ourselves ? I think we are
similar to other projects, currently switching from maven 1 to maven 2.
Luc
>
>>> Luc
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [math] going towards 1.2 release ?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 01/02/2008, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 AM, <lu...@free.fr> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Their have been lot of work done recently on [math]. The last bugs have been
> > fixed and should be closed in Jira soon.
> >
> > What about preparing 1.2 release ?
> >
>
> Good idea. I will finish the last bits on the Anova addition and some
> other cleanup I wanted to do this weekend and roll a RC, after
> updating the release plan to drop a couple of things (e.g. repackaging
> the analysis package - after thinking more about this and observing
> the lingering effects that a similar move had on [collections], I
> think we should leave as is).
>
> There could be some things related to deprecating abstract factories
> uniformly or cleaning up solvers, improving documentation for analysis
> package that may derail things - patches welcome! - but I will try to
> slug through enough of it this weekend to get an RC out. Because m2
> is going to present some challenges, I will take the "old style" RC =
> RC approach so we can iterate to a final.
>
> Phil
>
>
Just run Findbugs on the code; I'll post a JIRA with the findings (not many).
SVN includes some source under mantissa - is this obsolete, or a work
in progress? It does not compile (e.g.
org.spaceroots.mantissa.estimation package is missing), and is not
included in the M2 build.
Also, Junit for Java 1.3 is now at 3.8.2; might as well update the build?
It would be useful to include a simple "how to build" document in SVN
(and on the web-site).
> > Luc
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [math] going towards 1.2 release ?
Posted by Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 1, 2008 5:24 AM, <lu...@free.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Their have been lot of work done recently on [math]. The last bugs have been
> fixed and should be closed in Jira soon.
>
> What about preparing 1.2 release ?
>
Good idea. I will finish the last bits on the Anova addition and some
other cleanup I wanted to do this weekend and roll a RC, after
updating the release plan to drop a couple of things (e.g. repackaging
the analysis package - after thinking more about this and observing
the lingering effects that a similar move had on [collections], I
think we should leave as is).
There could be some things related to deprecating abstract factories
uniformly or cleaning up solvers, improving documentation for analysis
package that may derail things - patches welcome! - but I will try to
slug through enough of it this weekend to get an RC out. Because m2
is going to present some challenges, I will take the "old style" RC =
RC approach so we can iterate to a final.
Phil
> Luc
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org