You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Neale (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org> on 2010/06/17 09:38:14 UTC

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (MNG-4391) DependencyManagement should allow to manage use of re-named, woven, instrumented or compatible artifacts

    [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=194429#action_194429 ] 

Neale edited comment on MNG-4391 at 6/17/10 2:37 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------

I don't get your objection. What's the 'relocation logic' problem?

Direct artifact substitution is what in many cases the developer needs, so surely the "good idea" test is whether it makes Maven easier to use and maintain.

If you look at the comments on MNG-1977, you'll find David Jencks and Kees de Kooter suggesting the same as me.

      was (Author: neale87):
    I don't get your objection. What's the 'relocation logic' problem?

Direct artifact substitution is what in many cases the developer needs, so surely the "good idea" test is whether it makes Maven easier to use and maintain.

If you look at the comments on MNG-1977, you'll find David Jencks and Kees de Kooter suggesting the same is me.
  
> DependencyManagement should allow <replaceWith> to manage use of re-named, woven, instrumented or compatible artifacts
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-4391
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4391
>             Project: Maven 2 & 3
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Dependencies
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.1
>            Reporter: Neale
>
> [if only this was a later version of JIRA I'd have not lost all of what I just typed, as I could use Mylyn instead of the web UI.  here goes again...]
> The challenge of using a different artifact instead of the one that is specified in a POM that you are consuming is not an easy one.
> Examples where this hits uses is:
> - the artifact name and packaging changes that Spring made at 2.5.6A (which was a big improvement)
> - wanting to use SLF4J instead of Apache commons logging (i.e. use something that provides the same API, but is an entirely different project)
> - wanting to use your own derivation of a public artifact
> - wanting to use a woven/instrumented version of a public artifact
> The current approach to replacing, say org.springframework : spring-beans with org.springframework : org.springframework.beans is to do ('scuse the shorthand):
> {code:xml}
> <dependencyManagement>
>   <dependencies>
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>com.sun.jersey.contribs</groupId>
>       <artifactId>jersey-spring</artifactId>
>       <exclusions> 
>            org.springframework : spring-beans
>       </exclusions>
>     </dependency>
>     ... repeat for every artifact that uses spring-beans, and then add more if adding another artifact
>   </dependencies>
> </dependencyManagement>
> {code}
> to exclude it, and then globally include the replacement using:
> {code:xml}
> <dependencies>
>   <dependency>
>     <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
>     <artifactid>org.springframework.beans</groupId>
>     <version>${spring.version}</version>
>   </dependency>
> </dependencies>
> {code}
> This is error prone, and could be made far easier by an extension to dependencies, which would remove the need to know what artifacts (jersey-spring in the above example) use the artifact that you are replacing.  Here's how it would look:
> {code:xml}
> <dependencyManagement>
>   <!-- this declares the version we want to use if this artifact is in use -->
>   <dependencies>
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
>       <artifactid>org.springframework.beans</groupId>
>       <version>${spring.version}</version>
>     </dependency>
>     <!-- This deals with artifact name change -->
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
>       <artifactid>spring-beans</groupId>
>       <replaceWith>  <!-- list of dependency elements -->
>           <dependency>
>             <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
>             <artifactid>org.springframework.beans</groupId>
>           </dependency>
>           <!-- more dependency elements could be added here if an artifact has been split -->
>       </replaceWith>
>     </dependency>
> </dependencies>
> {code}
> NOTE:
> - Nothing is specified in <dependencies> so no artifacts are globally added where they may not be needed.  This means we can develop a project wide parent pom.xml.
> - Artifacts can have been split and merged
> - Derived artifacts, such as instrumented ones can easily be substituted, and could be selectively substituted using profiles.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira