RE: [jira] Commented: (XERCESC-1069) configure gcc 64-bit on solaris fails

[Alberto Massari <am...@datadirect.com>]

At 05:28 PM 5/22/2006 -0400, Scott Cantor wrote:
> > Can you check if rpmbuild instead needs some
> > specific switch? According to the bug reporter,
> > using {%_lib} in the spec file should be enough
> > to be compatible with both 32 and 64 bit environments.
>
>When I ran into this with Xerces 2.x, one issue had to do with specifying
>the --libdir switch using the -C switch to runConfigure. It was building
>things into lib but then the rest of the specfile was using lib64.
>
>Since runConfigure is gone (I think?), might not be the same problem.

Hi Scott,
do you have the time to test the 3.0 branch? It would be very 
helpful, as I don't have a 64-bit hardware nor the experience with 
the 64-bit architecture.

Thanks in advance,
Alberto

>-- Scott
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-help@xerces.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-help@xerces.apache.org

RE: [jira] Commented: (XERCESC-1069) configure gcc 64-bit on solaris fails

[Scott Cantor <ca...@osu.edu>]

> do you have the time to test the 3.0 branch? It would be very 
> helpful, as I don't have a 64-bit hardware nor the experience with 
> the 64-bit architecture.

I sympathize...I do have access to one box I test on for the moment. It's on
my TODO list to check this, I've been trying to find time to test
XML-Security for Berin on the same kinds of platforms, but I wanted to test
Xerces as well as soon as I can.

Is there a tarball of 3.0 anywhere, or just svn trunk?

I have to package Xerces and xmlsec for all the OpenSAML/Shibboleth
supported platforms, so I've been messing with those builds and specfiles
for a while now. Some folks at Stanford are working on packages for Debian
now as well. My hope is for 3.0 to resolve most of that custom packaging.

Do you have a timeline at this point for when 3.0 should be final? Is it
basically "when people stop reporting issues" or sometime later?

-- Scott


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-help@xerces.apache.org