You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2016/12/04 06:26:44 UTC
Review on Jira for 0.4.0-incubating
Hi beamers,
We plan a 0.4.0-incubating release pretty soon. I propose to manage this
release.
I started to review the Jira with fix version set to 0.4.0-incubating.
Please, update the fix version in Jira if you are working on specific
Jira and you want to include in the 0.4.0-incubating release.
Thanks
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofr�
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Review on Jira for 0.4.0-incubating
Posted by Davor Bonaci <da...@google.com.INVALID>.
>
> I wanted to suggest if we can have sort of a window or timeline for
> feature/bug code freeze prior to release to ensure stability?
>
Release branches are a typical solution; I think we just need to get better
in using them appropriately.
Re: Review on Jira for 0.4.0-incubating
Posted by Neelesh Salian <ns...@cloudera.com>.
+1 to Davor and JB's point.
The incubator stuff can certainly be done thoroughly after the board's
decision (if in favor).
Graduation aside, keeping up the cadence of the release would be better in
the product life cycle.
Perhaps a different thread altogether but I wanted to suggest if we can
have sort of a window or timeline for feature/bug code freeze prior to
release to ensure stability?
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Davor Bonaci <da...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:
> I'd suggest to proceed with 0.4.0-incubating (as JB previously planned).
>
> My reasoning: I don't think we'll be able to release a non-incubating
> release next week, regardless of the Board's graduation decision. I think
> it will take a while (more details to follow on a separate thread). On the
> other hand, 0.3.0-incubating has some important issues (e.g., template
> projects don't work across runners, WordCount has issues on Windows OS). I
> think it makes sense to fix these issues for our users, and have a better
> product if/when the graduation announcement comes.
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Either way is fine for me too.
> >
> > We discussed about the release schedule independently from the graduation
> > process, that's why 0.4.0-incubator was planned around today.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >
> > On 12/13/2016 06:02 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >
> >> Hate to suggest this….
> >>
> >> Assuming the Board OK’s the graduation next Wednesday, if we wait till
> >> then to do the build, we can drop the the incubator stuff entirely and
> it
> >> could be a “first release” outside of incubation. We could avoid the
> >> extra vote on the incubator list, etc….
> >>
> >> Would it make sense to delay the week? Not a big deal either way, but
> I
> >> don’t think I’ve ever seen a project do a release between the graduation
> >> vote and the board vote. Every project I’ve seen decided to wait to
> have
> >> the “we’ve graduated!” release.
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.INVALID>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Update: we think we've knocked off all the 0.4.0-incubating blockers,
> >>> including postponing some. JB is going to start the release process
> soon!
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Very good point Frances.
> >>>>
> >>>> Definitely something we have to do.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> JB
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 12/04/2016 07:38 AM, Frances Perry wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Sounds great, JB!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The major blocker in my opinion is to finish the polishing pass on
> the
> >>>>> quickstarts and example archetypes, so that users will have a great
> >>>>> experience trying out 0.4.0-incubating. I know we've made some
> >>>>> significant
> >>>>> progress there in the last few weeks, but I don't think we've quite
> >>>>> finished. For example, https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/BEAM-909
> >>>>> is
> >>>>> unresolved and marked as 0.4.0-incubating.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> jb@nanthrax.net
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi beamers,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We plan a 0.4.0-incubating release pretty soon. I propose to manage
> >>>>>> this
> >>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I started to review the Jira with fix version set to
> 0.4.0-incubating.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please, update the fix version in Jira if you are working on
> specific
> >>>>>> Jira
> >>>>>> and you want to include in the 0.4.0-incubating release.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> JB
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
> >>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>> jbonofre@apache.org
> >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbonofre@apache.org
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
>
--
Neelesh Srinivas Salian
Customer Operations Engineer
Re: Review on Jira for 0.4.0-incubating
Posted by Davor Bonaci <da...@google.com.INVALID>.
I'd suggest to proceed with 0.4.0-incubating (as JB previously planned).
My reasoning: I don't think we'll be able to release a non-incubating
release next week, regardless of the Board's graduation decision. I think
it will take a while (more details to follow on a separate thread). On the
other hand, 0.3.0-incubating has some important issues (e.g., template
projects don't work across runners, WordCount has issues on Windows OS). I
think it makes sense to fix these issues for our users, and have a better
product if/when the graduation announcement comes.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Either way is fine for me too.
>
> We discussed about the release schedule independently from the graduation
> process, that's why 0.4.0-incubator was planned around today.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 12/13/2016 06:02 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>> Hate to suggest this….
>>
>> Assuming the Board OK’s the graduation next Wednesday, if we wait till
>> then to do the build, we can drop the the incubator stuff entirely and it
>> could be a “first release” outside of incubation. We could avoid the
>> extra vote on the incubator list, etc….
>>
>> Would it make sense to delay the week? Not a big deal either way, but I
>> don’t think I’ve ever seen a project do a release between the graduation
>> vote and the board vote. Every project I’ve seen decided to wait to have
>> the “we’ve graduated!” release.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.INVALID>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Update: we think we've knocked off all the 0.4.0-incubating blockers,
>>> including postponing some. JB is going to start the release process soon!
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Very good point Frances.
>>>>
>>>> Definitely something we have to do.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/04/2016 07:38 AM, Frances Perry wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sounds great, JB!
>>>>>
>>>>> The major blocker in my opinion is to finish the polishing pass on the
>>>>> quickstarts and example archetypes, so that users will have a great
>>>>> experience trying out 0.4.0-incubating. I know we've made some
>>>>> significant
>>>>> progress there in the last few weeks, but I don't think we've quite
>>>>> finished. For example, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-909
>>>>> is
>>>>> unresolved and marked as 0.4.0-incubating.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net
>>>>> >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi beamers,
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We plan a 0.4.0-incubating release pretty soon. I propose to manage
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I started to review the Jira with fix version set to 0.4.0-incubating.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please, update the fix version in Jira if you are working on specific
>>>>>> Jira
>>>>>> and you want to include in the 0.4.0-incubating release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: Review on Jira for 0.4.0-incubating
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi,
Either way is fine for me too.
We discussed about the release schedule independently from the
graduation process, that's why 0.4.0-incubator was planned around today.
Regards
JB
On 12/13/2016 06:02 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> Hate to suggest this\u2026.
>
> Assuming the Board OK\u2019s the graduation next Wednesday, if we wait till then to do the build, we can drop the the incubator stuff entirely and it could be a \u201cfirst release\u201d outside of incubation. We could avoid the extra vote on the incubator list, etc\u2026.
>
> Would it make sense to delay the week? Not a big deal either way, but I don\u2019t think I\u2019ve ever seen a project do a release between the graduation vote and the board vote. Every project I\u2019ve seen decided to wait to have the \u201cwe\u2019ve graduated!\u201d release.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>> Update: we think we've knocked off all the 0.4.0-incubating blockers,
>> including postponing some. JB is going to start the release process soon!
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofr� <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Very good point Frances.
>>>
>>> Definitely something we have to do.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/04/2016 07:38 AM, Frances Perry wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sounds great, JB!
>>>>
>>>> The major blocker in my opinion is to finish the polishing pass on the
>>>> quickstarts and example archetypes, so that users will have a great
>>>> experience trying out 0.4.0-incubating. I know we've made some significant
>>>> progress there in the last few weeks, but I don't think we've quite
>>>> finished. For example, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-909 is
>>>> unresolved and marked as 0.4.0-incubating.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofr� <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi beamers,
>>>>>
>>>>> We plan a 0.4.0-incubating release pretty soon. I propose to manage this
>>>>> release.
>>>>>
>>>>> I started to review the Jira with fix version set to 0.4.0-incubating.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please, update the fix version in Jira if you are working on specific
>>>>> Jira
>>>>> and you want to include in the 0.4.0-incubating release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofr�
>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofr�
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofr�
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Review on Jira for 0.4.0-incubating
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
Hate to suggest this….
Assuming the Board OK’s the graduation next Wednesday, if we wait till then to do the build, we can drop the the incubator stuff entirely and it could be a “first release” outside of incubation. We could avoid the extra vote on the incubator list, etc….
Would it make sense to delay the week? Not a big deal either way, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen a project do a release between the graduation vote and the board vote. Every project I’ve seen decided to wait to have the “we’ve graduated!” release.
Dan
> On Dec 13, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Update: we think we've knocked off all the 0.4.0-incubating blockers,
> including postponing some. JB is going to start the release process soon!
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Very good point Frances.
>>
>> Definitely something we have to do.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 12/04/2016 07:38 AM, Frances Perry wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds great, JB!
>>>
>>> The major blocker in my opinion is to finish the polishing pass on the
>>> quickstarts and example archetypes, so that users will have a great
>>> experience trying out 0.4.0-incubating. I know we've made some significant
>>> progress there in the last few weeks, but I don't think we've quite
>>> finished. For example, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-909 is
>>> unresolved and marked as 0.4.0-incubating.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi beamers,
>>>>
>>>> We plan a 0.4.0-incubating release pretty soon. I propose to manage this
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> I started to review the Jira with fix version set to 0.4.0-incubating.
>>>>
>>>> Please, update the fix version in Jira if you are working on specific
>>>> Jira
>>>> and you want to include in the 0.4.0-incubating release.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: Review on Jira for 0.4.0-incubating
Posted by Dan Halperin <dh...@google.com.INVALID>.
Update: we think we've knocked off all the 0.4.0-incubating blockers,
including postponing some. JB is going to start the release process soon!
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> Very good point Frances.
>
> Definitely something we have to do.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 12/04/2016 07:38 AM, Frances Perry wrote:
>
>> Sounds great, JB!
>>
>> The major blocker in my opinion is to finish the polishing pass on the
>> quickstarts and example archetypes, so that users will have a great
>> experience trying out 0.4.0-incubating. I know we've made some significant
>> progress there in the last few weeks, but I don't think we've quite
>> finished. For example, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-909 is
>> unresolved and marked as 0.4.0-incubating.
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi beamers,
>>>
>>> We plan a 0.4.0-incubating release pretty soon. I propose to manage this
>>> release.
>>>
>>> I started to review the Jira with fix version set to 0.4.0-incubating.
>>>
>>> Please, update the fix version in Jira if you are working on specific
>>> Jira
>>> and you want to include in the 0.4.0-incubating release.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: Review on Jira for 0.4.0-incubating
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Very good point Frances.
Definitely something we have to do.
Regards
JB
On 12/04/2016 07:38 AM, Frances Perry wrote:
> Sounds great, JB!
>
> The major blocker in my opinion is to finish the polishing pass on the
> quickstarts and example archetypes, so that users will have a great
> experience trying out 0.4.0-incubating. I know we've made some significant
> progress there in the last few weeks, but I don't think we've quite
> finished. For example, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-909 is
> unresolved and marked as 0.4.0-incubating.
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofr� <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi beamers,
>>
>> We plan a 0.4.0-incubating release pretty soon. I propose to manage this
>> release.
>>
>> I started to review the Jira with fix version set to 0.4.0-incubating.
>>
>> Please, update the fix version in Jira if you are working on specific Jira
>> and you want to include in the 0.4.0-incubating release.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofr�
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofr�
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Review on Jira for 0.4.0-incubating
Posted by Frances Perry <fj...@google.com.INVALID>.
Sounds great, JB!
The major blocker in my opinion is to finish the polishing pass on the
quickstarts and example archetypes, so that users will have a great
experience trying out 0.4.0-incubating. I know we've made some significant
progress there in the last few weeks, but I don't think we've quite
finished. For example, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-909 is
unresolved and marked as 0.4.0-incubating.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> Hi beamers,
>
> We plan a 0.4.0-incubating release pretty soon. I propose to manage this
> release.
>
> I started to review the Jira with fix version set to 0.4.0-incubating.
>
> Please, update the fix version in Jira if you are working on specific Jira
> and you want to include in the 0.4.0-incubating release.
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>