You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Paul Gier (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org> on 2010/09/01 23:42:32 UTC
[jira] Commented: (MNG-4789) [regression] Difference in compile
scope dependency resolution
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=233968#action_233968 ]
Paul Gier commented on MNG-4789:
--------------------------------
This previous discussion also seems relevant:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Transitive-and-inherited-dependencies-potential-bug-or-my-misunderstanding-of-the-mechanism-td119738.html#a119738
> [regression] Difference in compile scope dependency resolution
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-4789
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4789
> Project: Maven 2 & 3
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Dependencies
> Environment: maven-3.0-beta-2 vs. maven-3.0-beta-3 (trunk)
> Reporter: Paul Gier
> Attachments: maven-3-dependency-issue.zip
>
>
> There is a small difference in dependency resolution behaviour from 3.0-beta-2 to 3.0-beta-3. I have a project with multiple interdependent modules.
> module 2 -> module 1 -> thirdparty dep
> Module 1 has a compile scope dependency on thirdparty dep. Module 2 has a test scope dependency on module 1. Using dependency management, in 3.0-beta-2 module 2 ended up with a test scope dependency on thirdparty. In 3.0-beta-3 module 2 ends up with a compile scope dependency. "mvn dependency:tree" reports a test scope in both cases, but with maven-3.0-beta-3 the thirdparty dep appears in the compile classpath.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira