You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@freemarker.apache.org by Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> on 2017/01/16 11:11:18 UTC
[VOTE] Which logo?
We will replace our square logo at Twitter
(https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
in the future elsewhere too.
Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
(The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
anywhere.)
Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
Posted by Sergio Fernández <wi...@apache.org>.
I like more the third.
Thanks for Julien Nicolas for your contribution!
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> in the future elsewhere too.
>
> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
>
> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
> anywhere.)
>
> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
>
>
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)
Posted by David E Jones <de...@dejc.com>.
I still like #3 on the top row... simple, and square is nice on certain sites
(ie certain sites require a square logo).
-David
On Jan 19 2017, at 4:30 am, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
> A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling
if you have maintained FM... <-; ).
>
> I change my vote to +1 for #1.5.
>
>
Monday, January 16, 2017, 11:07:29 PM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> I prefer #1.
>
> But... If I can provide a new one regarding comments
> (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ) I prefer
> #1.5 ;)
>
> Regards,
>
> Julien.
>
>
> On 16/01/2017 12:11, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
>> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
>> in the future elsewhere too.
>>
>> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
>>
>> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
>> anywhere.)
>>
>> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
>>
>
>
>
> \--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)
Posted by Kirys <ki...@neoteroi.org>.
On 19/01/2017 13:30, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
> new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
> changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling
> if you have maintained FM... <-; ).
#1.5
Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
OK, I focused, and I still prefer 2 with its (very hard to see) paler shadow
Jacques
Le 19/01/2017 � 18:47, Jacques Le Roux a �crit :
> Sincerely I don't see the differences between 1.5 and 2.
>
> Disclaimer: I'm a bit daltonian
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 19/01/2017 � 13:30, Daniel Dekany a �crit :
>> A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
>> new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
>> changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling
>> if you have maintained FM... <-; ).
>>
>> I change my vote to +1 for #1.5.
>>
>>
>> Monday, January 16, 2017, 11:07:29 PM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I prefer #1.
>>>
>>> But... If I can provide a new one regarding comments
>>> (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ) I prefer
>>> #1.5 ;)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Julien.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/01/2017 12:11, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>>> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
>>>> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
>>>> in the future elsewhere too.
>>>>
>>>> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
>>>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
>>>>
>>>> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
>>>> anywhere.)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
>>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Sincerely I don't see the differences between 1.5 and 2.
Disclaimer: I'm a bit daltonian
Jacques
Le 19/01/2017 � 13:30, Daniel Dekany a �crit :
> A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
> new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
> changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling
> if you have maintained FM... <-; ).
>
> I change my vote to +1 for #1.5.
>
>
> Monday, January 16, 2017, 11:07:29 PM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I prefer #1.
>>
>> But... If I can provide a new one regarding comments
>> (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ) I prefer
>> #1.5 ;)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Julien.
>>
>>
>> On 16/01/2017 12:11, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
>>> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
>>> in the future elsewhere too.
>>>
>>> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
>>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
>>>
>>> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
>>> anywhere.)
>>>
>>> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)
Posted by Christoph Rüger <c....@synesty.com>.
+1 for 1.5
Am 19.01.2017 6:19 nachm. schrieb "Jacopo Cappellato" <
jacopo.cappellato@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>
> wrote:
>
> > A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
> > new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
> > changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling
> > if you have maintained FM... <-; ).
> >
>
> :-)
>
>
> >
> > I change my vote to +1 for #1.5.
> >
>
> I am also going to change my vote with a +1 for #1.5
>
> Jacopo
>
>
> >
> >
> > Monday, January 16, 2017, 11:07:29 PM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I prefer #1.
> > >
> > > But... If I can provide a new one regarding comments
> > > (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ) I
> prefer
> > > #1.5 ;)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Julien.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 16/01/2017 12:11, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> > >> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> > >> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> > >> in the future elsewhere too.
> > >>
> > >> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> > >> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
> > >>
> > >> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
> > >> anywhere.)
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Daniel Dekany
> >
> >
>
--
Synesty GmbH
Moritz-von-Rohr-Str. 1a
07745 Jena
Tel.: +49 3641 559649
Fax.: +49 3641 5596499
Internet: http://synesty.com
Geschäftsführer: Christoph Rüger
Unternehmenssitz: Jena
Handelsregister B beim Amtsgericht: Jena
Handelsregister-Nummer: HRB 508766
Ust-IdNr.: DE287564982
Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)
Posted by Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
> A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
> new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
> changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling
> if you have maintained FM... <-; ).
>
:-)
>
> I change my vote to +1 for #1.5.
>
I am also going to change my vote with a +1 for #1.5
Jacopo
>
>
> Monday, January 16, 2017, 11:07:29 PM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I prefer #1.
> >
> > But... If I can provide a new one regarding comments
> > (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ) I prefer
> > #1.5 ;)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Julien.
> >
> >
> > On 16/01/2017 12:11, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> >> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> >> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> >> in the future elsewhere too.
> >>
> >> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> >> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
> >>
> >> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
> >> anywhere.)
> >>
> >> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Which logo, now with a new contender (#1.5)
Posted by Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>.
A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling
if you have maintained FM... <-; ).
I change my vote to +1 for #1.5.
Monday, January 16, 2017, 11:07:29 PM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I prefer #1.
>
> But... If I can provide a new one regarding comments
> (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ) I prefer
> #1.5 ;)
>
> Regards,
>
> Julien.
>
>
> On 16/01/2017 12:11, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
>> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
>> in the future elsewhere too.
>>
>> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
>>
>> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
>> anywhere.)
>>
>> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
>>
>
>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
Posted by Julien NICOLAS <ju...@nereide.fr>.
Hello,
I prefer #1.
But... If I can provide a new one regarding comments
(https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ) I prefer
#1.5 ;)
Regards,
Julien.
On 16/01/2017 12:11, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> in the future elsewhere too.
>
> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
>
> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
> anywhere.)
>
> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
>
Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
Posted by Barrie Selack <ba...@rockhopper.com>.
I like #3, clean, simple.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 6:11 AM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> in the future elsewhere too.
>
> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
>
> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
> anywhere.)
>
> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
Posted by Taher Alkhateeb <sl...@gmail.com>.
Cool work Nicolas,
If I may suggest, perhaps #1 could be improved by having a smaller shadow
that does not extend all the way to the corner, similar to the original
logo. The problems with #1 and #2 is that although the idea is nice, the
shadow pulling all the way to the corner makes it a bit too classic? A
shorter version might look much nicer while preserving the 3D effect?
Just tossing ideas around!
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Mauricio Nuñez <ma...@inversion.cl>
wrote:
> I like #3
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Mauricio
>
> 2017-01-16 9:02 GMT-03:00 <br...@me.com>:
>
> > I vote for #2, although the 3d effect is overdone.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > -- Denis.
> > Original Message
> > From: Christoph Rüger
> > Sent: Monday, 16 January 2017 11:27
> > To: Freemarker dev Mailinglist; Daniel Dekany
> > Reply To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
> >
> > +1 for top row #3
> >
> > I would also like a version of #3 with rounded corners for an app-icon
> > look-and-feel.
> >
> > 2017-01-16 12:11 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>:
> >
> > > We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> > > (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> > > in the future elsewhere too.
> > >
> > > Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
> > >
> > > (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
> > > anywhere.)
> > >
> > > Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Daniel Dekany
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Christoph Rüger, Geschäftsführer
> > Synesty <https://synesty.com/> - Automatisierung, Schnittstellen,
> > Datenfeeds
> > Tel.: +49 3641/559649
> >
> > Xing: https://www.xing.com/profile/Christoph_Rueger2
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/christoph-rueger/a/685/198
> >
> > --
> > Synesty GmbH
> > Moritz-von-Rohr-Str. 1a
> > 07745 Jena
> > Tel.: +49 3641 559649
> > Fax.: +49 3641 5596499
> > Internet: http://synesty.com
> >
> > Geschäftsführer: Christoph Rüger
> > Unternehmenssitz: Jena
> > Handelsregister B beim Amtsgericht: Jena
> > Handelsregister-Nummer: HRB 508766
> > Ust-IdNr.: DE287564982
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
Posted by Mauricio Nuñez <ma...@inversion.cl>.
I like #3
Regards,
Mauricio
2017-01-16 9:02 GMT-03:00 <br...@me.com>:
> I vote for #2, although the 3d effect is overdone.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Denis.
> Original Message
> From: Christoph Rüger
> Sent: Monday, 16 January 2017 11:27
> To: Freemarker dev Mailinglist; Daniel Dekany
> Reply To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
>
> +1 for top row #3
>
> I would also like a version of #3 with rounded corners for an app-icon
> look-and-feel.
>
> 2017-01-16 12:11 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>:
>
> > We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> > (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> > in the future elsewhere too.
> >
> > Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
> >
> > (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
> > anywhere.)
> >
> > Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Daniel Dekany
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Christoph Rüger, Geschäftsführer
> Synesty <https://synesty.com/> - Automatisierung, Schnittstellen,
> Datenfeeds
> Tel.: +49 3641/559649
>
> Xing: https://www.xing.com/profile/Christoph_Rueger2
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/christoph-rueger/a/685/198
>
> --
> Synesty GmbH
> Moritz-von-Rohr-Str. 1a
> 07745 Jena
> Tel.: +49 3641 559649
> Fax.: +49 3641 5596499
> Internet: http://synesty.com
>
> Geschäftsführer: Christoph Rüger
> Unternehmenssitz: Jena
> Handelsregister B beim Amtsgericht: Jena
> Handelsregister-Nummer: HRB 508766
> Ust-IdNr.: DE287564982
>
Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
Posted by br...@me.com.
I vote for #2, although the 3d effect is overdone.
Cheers,
-- Denis.
Original Message
From: Christoph Rüger
Sent: Monday, 16 January 2017 11:27
To: Freemarker dev Mailinglist; Daniel Dekany
Reply To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
+1 for top row #3
I would also like a version of #3 with rounded corners for an app-icon
look-and-feel.
2017-01-16 12:11 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>:
> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> in the future elsewhere too.
>
> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
>
> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
> anywhere.)
>
> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
>
>
--
Christoph Rüger, Geschäftsführer
Synesty <https://synesty.com/> - Automatisierung, Schnittstellen, Datenfeeds
Tel.: +49 3641/559649
Xing: https://www.xing.com/profile/Christoph_Rueger2
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/christoph-rueger/a/685/198
--
Synesty GmbH
Moritz-von-Rohr-Str. 1a
07745 Jena
Tel.: +49 3641 559649
Fax.: +49 3641 5596499
Internet: http://synesty.com
Geschäftsführer: Christoph Rüger
Unternehmenssitz: Jena
Handelsregister B beim Amtsgericht: Jena
Handelsregister-Nummer: HRB 508766
Ust-IdNr.: DE287564982
Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
Posted by Christoph Rüger <c....@synesty.com>.
+1 for top row #3
I would also like a version of #3 with rounded corners for an app-icon
look-and-feel.
2017-01-16 12:11 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>:
> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> in the future elsewhere too.
>
> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
>
> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
> anywhere.)
>
> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
>
>
--
Christoph Rüger, Geschäftsführer
Synesty <https://synesty.com/> - Automatisierung, Schnittstellen, Datenfeeds
Tel.: +49 3641/559649
Xing: https://www.xing.com/profile/Christoph_Rueger2
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/christoph-rueger/a/685/198
--
Synesty GmbH
Moritz-von-Rohr-Str. 1a
07745 Jena
Tel.: +49 3641 559649
Fax.: +49 3641 5596499
Internet: http://synesty.com
Geschäftsführer: Christoph Rüger
Unternehmenssitz: Jena
Handelsregister B beim Amtsgericht: Jena
Handelsregister-Nummer: HRB 508766
Ust-IdNr.: DE287564982
Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
Posted by Piyush Mor <pi...@gmail.com>.
I like #3
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017, 20:50 Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I like the first.
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>
> wrote:
>
> > We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> > (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> > in the future elsewhere too.
> >
> > Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
> >
> > (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
> > anywhere.)
> >
> > Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Daniel Dekany
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
Posted by Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@gmail.com>.
I like the first.
Jacopo
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> in the future elsewhere too.
>
> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
>
> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
> anywhere.)
>
> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
Posted by David E Jones <de...@dejc.com>.
+1 for #3 as well.
Modern designs are getting more flat and simplistic (which IMO is great). It
seems to be related to people becoming more familiar with standard UI elements
so there really is no need for 3D effects and other fancy things (including
shadows, etc) that usually end up making things look cluttered and are
generally distracting.
-David
On Jan 16 2017, at 3:11 am, Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu> wrote:
> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
(https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
in the future elsewhere too.
>
> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
>
> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
anywhere.)
>
> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
>
> \--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
Posted by Daniel Dekany <dd...@freemail.hu>.
I vote for the 1st.
Monday, January 16, 2017, 12:11:18 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> in the future elsewhere too.
>
> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
>
> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
> anywhere.)
>
> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
I vote for [1,2] though I'd prefer a bit less shadow
If I'd like to follow the flat design trend I'd choose [1,3] but I'm not against skeuomorphism when done right
Jacques
Le 16/01/2017 � 12:11, Daniel Dekany a �crit :
> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> in the future elsewhere too.
>
> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
>
> (The bottom row is for file icons, but currently we won't use them
> anywhere.)
>
> Thanks for Julien Nicolas for providing these!
>