You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Rory Winston <ro...@gmail.com> on 2008/10/01 00:51:02 UTC
Re: [vote] Release commons-net 2.0
Hmm, I havent explicitly put the pom.xml under
META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net
...I suspect Maven may have done this itself.
sebb wrote:
> On 28/09/2008, Rory Winston <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> After the RC inspection a week or so ago, I am putting up a candidate for
>> release. Based on the feedback on the RC, I have made the following changes:
>>
>> * Excluded the examples/ classes from the binary jar
>> * Put LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt in META-INF in the FTP-only jar
>> * Fixed some oddities in the changes.xml document (I dont know what Maven's
>> xdoc processor was doing here)
>> * Updated the version number
>> * Updated keys, checksums, etc, and added a release notes doc
>>
>> As usual, the files are here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/
>>
>
> The binary archive contains the Javadocs for the examples.
> Seems no point as the example source is not present, but not a blocker.
>
> The binary archive contains pom.properties and pom.xml in a rather odd
> directory:
>
> META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net
>
> Is that correct?
>
>
>> Please vote as you feel appropriate!
>> Thanks
>>
>> Rory
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [vote] Release commons-net 2.0
Posted by Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Rory Winston <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...I suspect Maven may have done this itself.
You're right. You can disable this behavior with the following configuration:
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-jar-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.2</version>
<configuration>
<archive>
<addMavenDescriptor>false</addMavenDescriptor>
</archive>
</configuration>
</plugin>
/niklas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [vote] Release commons-net 2.0
Posted by Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>.
On 10/1/08, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30/09/2008, Rory Winston <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hmm, I havent explicitly put the pom.xml under
> >
> > META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net
> >
> > ...I suspect Maven may have done this itself.
> >
>
> But is it correct?
>
> If not, will the incorrect location cause any problems for Maven?
It won't cause problems for Maven as it has put it there itself. In
fact, most JARs built with Maven2 has the pom included as it needs to
be explicitly disabled. Check for example the latest commons-io
release.
/niklas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [vote] Release commons-net 2.0
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 30/09/2008, Rory Winston <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm, I havent explicitly put the pom.xml under
>
> META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net
>
> ...I suspect Maven may have done this itself.
>
But is it correct?
If not, will the incorrect location cause any problems for Maven?
If the entries will cause problems for Maven, then they must be fixed
before release.
If not, then the problem can be fixed in a later release.
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 28/09/2008, Rory Winston <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > After the RC inspection a week or so ago, I am putting up a candidate
> for
> > > release. Based on the feedback on the RC, I have made the following
> changes:
> > >
> > > * Excluded the examples/ classes from the binary jar
> > > * Put LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt in META-INF in the FTP-only jar
> > > * Fixed some oddities in the changes.xml document (I dont know what
> Maven's
> > > xdoc processor was doing here)
> > > * Updated the version number
> > > * Updated keys, checksums, etc, and added a release notes doc
> > >
> > > As usual, the files are here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/
> > >
> > >
> >
> > The binary archive contains the Javadocs for the examples.
> > Seems no point as the example source is not present, but not a blocker.
> >
> > The binary archive contains pom.properties and pom.xml in a rather odd
> > directory:
> >
> > META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net
> >
> > Is that correct?
> >
> >
> >
> > > Please vote as you feel appropriate!
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Rory
> > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org