You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tapestry.apache.org by Ed...@marsh.com on 2003/06/03 16:05:10 UTC
Newbie Question: Appropriateness of Documentation
Hi,
I haved downloaded Tapestry 3.0 and wish to understand its proper use. I
have found four pdf files (Tutorial, Developer, User and Contributor). I
read the caveat in the Tutorial about it being significantly out of date.
Are the other documents appropriate for understanding version 3.0, or do
they address techniques and approaches that have been superseded by new
techniques and approaches? If the latter, what is the recommended reading?
Regards,
Ed
Re: Newbie Question: Appropriateness of Documentation
Posted by Neil Clayton <ne...@cloudnine.net.nz>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yes, that's because the document is posted there only so that people who don't
want to build it from CVS can read the content.
Neil
On Tuesday 03 Jun 2003 4:11 pm, Ido M. Tamir wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 Jun 2003 4:55 pm, Neil Clayton wrote:
> > there is a tutorial (v2, a work in progress) at
> >
> > http://tapestry-tutorial.cloudnine.net.nz (look for tutorial2.html)
> >
> > if you think it's on the right track, or even not, feel free to provide
> > feedback to the list. Even better - submit a patch to it! (it's in CVS).
> > The version as posted on the above URL was generated a few months ago.
>
> the link to the ant build script does not exist.
> http://tapestry-tutorial.cloudnine.net.nz/html/examples/DevelopmentEnvironm
>ent.zip
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+3MA+LXcfQF3yrNoRAmSnAJwKv5l4GH11tSe4g7QoWSS7e8rFUQCffbnb
sI7mv8nJwgyqRDgaQOKQoAQ=
=uP1d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Newbie Question: Appropriateness of Documentation
Posted by "Ido M. Tamir" <ta...@imp.univie.ac.at>.
On Tuesday 03 Jun 2003 4:55 pm, Neil Clayton wrote:
> there is a tutorial (v2, a work in progress) at
>
> http://tapestry-tutorial.cloudnine.net.nz (look for tutorial2.html)
> if you think it's on the right track, or even not, feel free to provide
> feedback to the list. Even better - submit a patch to it! (it's in CVS).
> The version as posted on the above URL was generated a few months ago.
the link to the ant build script does not exist.
http://tapestry-tutorial.cloudnine.net.nz/html/examples/DevelopmentEnvironment.zip
Thanks for all your efforts
Ido
Re: Newbie Question: Appropriateness of Documentation
Posted by Neil Clayton <ne...@cloudnine.net.nz>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
there is a tutorial (v2, a work in progress) at
http://tapestry-tutorial.cloudnine.net.nz (look for tutorial2.html)
It is a little out of date already, because I've not had time to add the 3.0
and now also 2.4 specific automatic property generation stuff to it, nor does
it talk about development without explicit component specifications, but it
should give you a little more than what is in the existing packaged one.
if you think it's on the right track, or even not, feel free to provide
feedback to the list. Even better - submit a patch to it! (it's in CVS). The
version as posted on the above URL was generated a few months ago.
Regards,
Neil Clayton
On Tuesday 03 Jun 2003 3:05 pm, Ed.Trembicki-Guy@marsh.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haved downloaded Tapestry 3.0 and wish to understand its proper use. I
> have found four pdf files (Tutorial, Developer, User and Contributor). I
> read the caveat in the Tutorial about it being significantly out of date.
> Are the other documents appropriate for understanding version 3.0, or do
> they address techniques and approaches that have been superseded by new
> techniques and approaches? If the latter, what is the recommended reading?
>
> Regards,
> Ed
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
- --
Regards,
Neil Clayton
(PS: If you see strange text you don't understand underneath my email, don't
worry - it's just my PGP signature)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+3LbkLXcfQF3yrNoRAgFOAJ4+EhYN96uesJVug/wpvpmkDxgxsgCffLt0
Qp+QYr8npeqXasMtv90t/zY=
=Aum9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----