You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de> on 2006/02/15 16:36:53 UTC
[Shale] Dialog
Hi,
a while back, there was a discussion regarding annotation based dialog
stuff (started by David or Gary ?).
I just found an interesting article about integration of Beehive's
PageFlow into JavaServer Faces ([1]).
Perhaps interesting for some of you as well. However, some stuff looks
similar to Shale's ViewHandler stuff ... :)
Regards,
Matthias
[1] - http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/a/2005/12/integrating-jsf-beehive.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [Shale] Dialog
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 2/15/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de> wrote:
>
> > Definitely interesting. There are some overlaps with what Shale does,
> > especially in the Shale Tiger Extensions[1] feature that lets you use
> > annotations to register components/converters/validators, define view
> > controllers, and declare managed beans.
>
> Right! That was what I was thinking first. But IMHO I like more the
> Shale way, since you don't need no interface or superclass.
>
> > You will notice that annotated navigation is not on that list ... and
>
> Really ? I have to search my older struts dev email. I am thinking,
> I have seen something like that in this list.
You're undoubtedly correct in remembering that the idea of annotated
navigation was proposed ... but you'll also find that my reply was "I'm not
a believer" :-)
-Matthias
Craig
> philosophically I believe that navigation should *not* be configured that
> > way. But it is certainly something that could be accomplished
> technically.
> >
> > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > [1] -
> http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/a/2005/12/integrating-jsf-beehive.html
> >
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > [1] http://struts.apache.org/struts-shale/features-tiger-extensions.html
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: [Shale] Dialog
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>.
> Really ? I have to search my older struts dev email. I am thinking,
> I have seen something like that in this list.
>
Ok... I found, what I was searching for...
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg16633.html
Making the dialog facility easier by "convention over config".
You got me :-) I guess I mixed some ideas, since you mentioned the tiger
extension... Anyway, the emails are *old* December is looooong time
ago ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
> -Matthias
>
>
> > philosophically I believe that navigation should *not* be configured that
> > way. But it is certainly something that could be accomplished technically.
> >
> > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > [1] - http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/a/2005/12/integrating-jsf-beehive.html
> >
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > [1] http://struts.apache.org/struts-shale/features-tiger-extensions.html
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [Shale] Dialog
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>.
> Definitely interesting. There are some overlaps with what Shale does,
> especially in the Shale Tiger Extensions[1] feature that lets you use
> annotations to register components/converters/validators, define view
> controllers, and declare managed beans.
Right! That was what I was thinking first. But IMHO I like more the
Shale way, since you don't need no interface or superclass.
> You will notice that annotated navigation is not on that list ... and
Really ? I have to search my older struts dev email. I am thinking,
I have seen something like that in this list.
-Matthias
> philosophically I believe that navigation should *not* be configured that
> way. But it is certainly something that could be accomplished technically.
>
> Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > [1] - http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/a/2005/12/integrating-jsf-beehive.html
>
>
> Craig
>
> [1] http://struts.apache.org/struts-shale/features-tiger-extensions.html
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [Shale] Dialog
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 2/15/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> a while back, there was a discussion regarding annotation based dialog
> stuff (started by David or Gary ?).
>
> I just found an interesting article about integration of Beehive's
> PageFlow into JavaServer Faces ([1]).
>
> Perhaps interesting for some of you as well. However, some stuff looks
> similar to Shale's ViewHandler stuff ... :)
Definitely interesting. There are some overlaps with what Shale does,
especially in the Shale Tiger Extensions[1] feature that lets you use
annotations to register components/converters/validators, define view
controllers, and declare managed beans.
You will notice that annotated navigation is not on that list ... and
philosophically I believe that navigation should *not* be configured that
way. But it is certainly something that could be accomplished technically.
Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [1] - http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/a/2005/12/integrating-jsf-beehive.html
Craig
[1] http://struts.apache.org/struts-shale/features-tiger-extensions.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>