You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Chuck Brinkman <ch...@gmail.com> on 2010/01/11 08:41:48 UTC
about org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.form.palette.Palette
As you can guess I'm new to wicket. Seems very good so far. I found this
Palette component and thought it might work well for me but I need to make
some modifications. So I started to dig in. I noticed that the component
uses js. I thought wicket was just java and just html. I do realize that
is a little but of marketing hype but could this component have been
implemented without any js? I read this in the Palette.java source file:
The palette itself cannot be ajaxified because it is a panel and therefore
does not receive any javascript events. I don't know what this means. Does
this mean that the click events to move data around could not be sent to the
server? Can this only be done using js? Or was js selected because it
would be too slow otherwise? If I just need to RTFM just say so. I would
appreciate some insight if someone has time. Thanks
Re: about org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.form.palette.Palette
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
you cannot do something like this:
palette.add(new ajaxformcomponentupdatingbehavior() {...})
instead you have to do it to one of the internal components which are
available via factory methods on Palette
-igor
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Chuck Brinkman <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can you tell me what this means "The palette itself cannot be ajaxified
> because it is a panel and therefore does not receive any javascript
> events."? Would a palette without javascript require full page loads?
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> you can build a palette that works without javascript but the user
>> experience will probably be poor
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Chuck Brinkman <ch...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > As you can guess I'm new to wicket. Seems very good so far. I found
>> this
>> > Palette component and thought it might work well for me but I need to
>> make
>> > some modifications. So I started to dig in. I noticed that the
>> component
>> > uses js. I thought wicket was just java and just html. I do realize
>> that
>> > is a little but of marketing hype but could this component have been
>> > implemented without any js? I read this in the Palette.java source file:
>> > The palette itself cannot be ajaxified because it is a panel and
>> therefore
>> > does not receive any javascript events. I don't know what this means.
>> Does
>> > this mean that the click events to move data around could not be sent to
>> the
>> > server? Can this only be done using js? Or was js selected because it
>> > would be too slow otherwise? If I just need to RTFM just say so. I
>> would
>> > appreciate some insight if someone has time. Thanks
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: about org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.form.palette.Palette
Posted by Chuck Brinkman <ch...@gmail.com>.
Can you tell me what this means "The palette itself cannot be ajaxified
because it is a panel and therefore does not receive any javascript
events."? Would a palette without javascript require full page loads?
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>wrote:
> you can build a palette that works without javascript but the user
> experience will probably be poor
>
> -igor
>
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Chuck Brinkman <ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > As you can guess I'm new to wicket. Seems very good so far. I found
> this
> > Palette component and thought it might work well for me but I need to
> make
> > some modifications. So I started to dig in. I noticed that the
> component
> > uses js. I thought wicket was just java and just html. I do realize
> that
> > is a little but of marketing hype but could this component have been
> > implemented without any js? I read this in the Palette.java source file:
> > The palette itself cannot be ajaxified because it is a panel and
> therefore
> > does not receive any javascript events. I don't know what this means.
> Does
> > this mean that the click events to move data around could not be sent to
> the
> > server? Can this only be done using js? Or was js selected because it
> > would be too slow otherwise? If I just need to RTFM just say so. I
> would
> > appreciate some insight if someone has time. Thanks
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: about org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.form.palette.Palette
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
you can build a palette that works without javascript but the user
experience will probably be poor
-igor
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Chuck Brinkman <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As you can guess I'm new to wicket. Seems very good so far. I found this
> Palette component and thought it might work well for me but I need to make
> some modifications. So I started to dig in. I noticed that the component
> uses js. I thought wicket was just java and just html. I do realize that
> is a little but of marketing hype but could this component have been
> implemented without any js? I read this in the Palette.java source file:
> The palette itself cannot be ajaxified because it is a panel and therefore
> does not receive any javascript events. I don't know what this means. Does
> this mean that the click events to move data around could not be sent to the
> server? Can this only be done using js? Or was js selected because it
> would be too slow otherwise? If I just need to RTFM just say so. I would
> appreciate some insight if someone has time. Thanks
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org