You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by Albert Lee <al...@gmail.com> on 2007/10/22 22:15:39 UTC
Proposal for releasing 1.0.1
We have a need to freeze and build the current content of the 1.0.1 release.
With Mike Dick's help and guidance, I am volunteering to do this release
work.
I am wondering if the community has any objection to this proposal. We are
looking to make this happen in the next couple/few weeks time frame.
Thanks
Albert Lee.
Re: Proposal for releasing 1.0.1
Posted by Marc Prud'hommeaux <mp...@apache.org>.
No objections from me. I was starting to think we should get a
maintenance release out there.
On Oct 22, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Thanks for volunteering. No objections from me.
>
> Craig
>
> On Oct 22, 2007, at 1:15 PM, Albert Lee wrote:
>
>> We have a need to freeze and build the current content of the
>> 1.0.1 release.
>>
>> With Mike Dick's help and guidance, I am volunteering to do this
>> release
>> work.
>>
>> I am wondering if the community has any objection to this
>> proposal. We are
>> looking to make this happen in the next couple/few weeks time frame.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Albert Lee.
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Re: Proposal for releasing 1.0.1
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Thanks for volunteering. No objections from me.
Craig
On Oct 22, 2007, at 1:15 PM, Albert Lee wrote:
> We have a need to freeze and build the current content of the 1.0.1
> release.
>
> With Mike Dick's help and guidance, I am volunteering to do this
> release
> work.
>
> I am wondering if the community has any objection to this proposal.
> We are
> looking to make this happen in the next couple/few weeks time frame.
>
> Thanks
> Albert Lee.
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: Proposal for releasing 1.0.1
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Albert,
On Oct 24, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Albert Lee wrote:
> Thanks for all the positive responses.
>
> Let's plan on freezing the content of the 1.0.1 release on 10/29
> Monday and
> I'll start the necessary work for this release.
>
> (Do we need a official vote on this decision?)
We need to vote on the release itself but your informal request for
feedback is sufficient to notify everyone.
Normally, in Apache projects, the minimum comment period on a
proposal is three days. Since you sent the request for comments on
Monday, Thursday would be the comment period close day.
If no one has anything negative to say before close of comments, we
will have consensus. But you can continue to plan your work...
Craig
>
> Please post here if you have any concerns on the timing of this
> proposal.
> Otherwise I'll proceed as plan on 10/29.
>
> Thanks again.
> Albert Lee.
>
> On 10/23/07, Patrick Linskey <pl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Theoretically, this process should be a bunch easier now that we have
>> an automated build machine running builds and uploading release
>> candidates on the 1.0.x line.
>>
>> Currently, the 1.0.x build is passing the CTS and all our tests
>> against Derby. A new release candidate build is automatically
>> triggered every time a change is made in the 1.0.x line.
>>
>> -Patrick
>>
>> On 10/22/07, Albert Lee <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> We have a need to freeze and build the current content of the
>>> 1.0.1release.
>>>
>>> With Mike Dick's help and guidance, I am volunteering to do this
>>> release
>>> work.
>>>
>>> I am wondering if the community has any objection to this
>>> proposal. We
>> are
>>> looking to make this happen in the next couple/few weeks time frame.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Albert Lee.
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Patrick Linskey
>> 202 669 5907
>>
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: Proposal for releasing 1.0.1
Posted by Albert Lee <al...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for all the positive responses.
Let's plan on freezing the content of the 1.0.1 release on 10/29 Monday and
I'll start the necessary work for this release.
(Do we need a official vote on this decision?)
Please post here if you have any concerns on the timing of this proposal.
Otherwise I'll proceed as plan on 10/29.
Thanks again.
Albert Lee.
On 10/23/07, Patrick Linskey <pl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Theoretically, this process should be a bunch easier now that we have
> an automated build machine running builds and uploading release
> candidates on the 1.0.x line.
>
> Currently, the 1.0.x build is passing the CTS and all our tests
> against Derby. A new release candidate build is automatically
> triggered every time a change is made in the 1.0.x line.
>
> -Patrick
>
> On 10/22/07, Albert Lee <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We have a need to freeze and build the current content of the 1.0.1release.
> >
> > With Mike Dick's help and guidance, I am volunteering to do this release
> > work.
> >
> > I am wondering if the community has any objection to this proposal. We
> are
> > looking to make this happen in the next couple/few weeks time frame.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Albert Lee.
> >
>
>
> --
> Patrick Linskey
> 202 669 5907
>
Re: Proposal for releasing 1.0.1
Posted by Patrick Linskey <pl...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Theoretically, this process should be a bunch easier now that we have
an automated build machine running builds and uploading release
candidates on the 1.0.x line.
Currently, the 1.0.x build is passing the CTS and all our tests
against Derby. A new release candidate build is automatically
triggered every time a change is made in the 1.0.x line.
-Patrick
On 10/22/07, Albert Lee <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We have a need to freeze and build the current content of the 1.0.1 release.
>
> With Mike Dick's help and guidance, I am volunteering to do this release
> work.
>
> I am wondering if the community has any objection to this proposal. We are
> looking to make this happen in the next couple/few weeks time frame.
>
> Thanks
> Albert Lee.
>
--
Patrick Linskey
202 669 5907
Re: Proposal for releasing 1.0.1
Posted by Patrick Linskey <pl...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good.
-Patrick
On 10/22/07, Albert Lee <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We have a need to freeze and build the current content of the 1.0.1 release.
>
> With Mike Dick's help and guidance, I am volunteering to do this release
> work.
>
> I am wondering if the community has any objection to this proposal. We are
> looking to make this happen in the next couple/few weeks time frame.
>
> Thanks
> Albert Lee.
>
--
Patrick Linskey
202 669 5907