You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> on 2007/01/11 20:49:32 UTC
jpa and annotation specs in 2.0
Are these two specs sorted? Can we switch to using the released 1.0
for them? server/trunk is still using:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
<artifactId>geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
<artifactId>geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>
--jason
Re: jpa and annotation specs in 2.0
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Aight this is done.
--jason
On Jan 11, 2007, at 6:06 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Yep. We now have final versions of these:
>
> geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.0
>
>
> -David
>
> On Jan 11, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Same with geronimo-jta_1.1_spec
>>
>> Also, looks like some of these specs are listed twice in the
>> dependencyManagement section... :-(
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>
>>> Are these two specs sorted? Can we switch to using the released
>>> 1.0 for them? server/trunk is still using:
>>>
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
>>> <artifactId>geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec</artifactId>
>>> <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>> </dependency>
>>>
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
>>> <artifactId>geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec</
>>> artifactId>
>>> <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>> </dependency>
>>>
>>> --jason
>>
>
Re: jpa and annotation specs in 2.0
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Yep. We now have final versions of these:
geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.0
geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0
geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0
geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0
geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.0
-David
On Jan 11, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Same with geronimo-jta_1.1_spec
>
> Also, looks like some of these specs are listed twice in the
> dependencyManagement section... :-(
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Are these two specs sorted? Can we switch to using the released
>> 1.0 for them? server/trunk is still using:
>>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
>> <artifactId>geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec</artifactId>
>> <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>> </dependency>
>>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
>> <artifactId>geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec</artifactId>
>> <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>> </dependency>
>>
>> --jason
>
Re: jpa and annotation specs in 2.0
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Same with geronimo-jta_1.1_spec
Also, looks like some of these specs are listed twice in the
dependencyManagement section... :-(
--jason
On Jan 11, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Are these two specs sorted? Can we switch to using the released
> 1.0 for them? server/trunk is still using:
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
> <artifactId>geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec</artifactId>
> <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> </dependency>
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
> <artifactId>geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec</artifactId>
> <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> </dependency>
>
> --jason