You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2008/01/11 15:09:09 UTC
[VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
I am calling for a release VOTE on the above releases of
Apache HTTP Server (1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8).
Pre-release tarballs of Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63
and 2.2.8 are available for download and test at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Their availability does not constitute an official release.
Voting will close in 72 hours (~9am, eastern, on Monday
Jan. 14th)
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I am calling for a release VOTE on the above releases of
> Apache HTTP Server (1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8).
>
> Pre-release tarballs of Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63
> and 2.2.8 are available for download and test at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Their availability does not constitute an official release.
>
> Voting will close in 72 hours (~9am, eastern, on Monday
> Jan. 14th)
[ ] 1.3.41
[ ] 2.0.63
[+1] 2.2.8
Looks good on apache.org (Solaris 10) and on some of mine freebsd machines.
-Paul
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Jorge Schrauwen <jo...@gmail.com>.
[ ] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41
[ ] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.63
[+1] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.8 (win32 + mac)
--
~Jorge
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by David McCreedy <Mc...@msn.com>.
+1 for Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41 on TPF
-David
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Jan 11, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I am calling for a release VOTE on the above releases of
> Apache HTTP Server (1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8).
>
> Pre-release tarballs of Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63
> and 2.2.8 are available for download and test at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Their availability does not constitute an official release.
>
> Voting will close in 72 hours (~9am, eastern, on Monday
> Jan. 14th)
>
[+1] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41
[+1] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.63
[+1] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.8
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I am calling for a release VOTE on the above releases of
> Apache HTTP Server (1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8).
>
> Pre-release tarballs of Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63
> and 2.2.8 are available for download and test at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Their availability does not constitute an official release.
>
> Voting will close in 72 hours (~9am, eastern, on Monday
> Jan. 14th)
[ ] 1.3.41
[ ] 2.0.63
[+1] 2.2.8
Looks good on apache.org (Solaris 10) and on some of mine freebsd machines.
-Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: testers-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: testers-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] Was: Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and
2.2.8
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 01/19/2008 03:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I will be announcing the release today!
>
>
Great! Thanks for all the RM work you have done
again.
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: [RESULT] Was: Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I will be announcing the release today!
[RESULT] Was: Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I see at least three +1 votes from PMC members for all three
candidate versions of Apache HTTP Server.
I call this vote closed with the result that all three will
be officially released... I will start that process.
Thanks to one and all!
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Martin Kraemer <ma...@apache.org>.
[+1] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41 on SINIX-i386
[+1] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41 on ReliantUNIX-mips
[+1] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41 on BS2000
I tried to compile these with the latest mod_ssl from www.mod_ssl.org
but they dumped core. Without EAPI and SSL, everything works like a
charm.
Martin
--
<Ma...@Fujitsu-Siemens.com> | Fujitsu Siemens
http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/imprint.html | 81730 Munich, Germany
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Martin Kraemer <ma...@apache.org>.
[+1] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.8 on SINIX-i386
--
<Ma...@Fujitsu-Siemens.com> | Fujitsu Siemens
http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/imprint.html | 81730 Munich, Germany
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Martin Kraemer <ma...@apache.org>.
[ ] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41
[ ] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.63
[+1] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.8 on BS2000
Martin
--
<Ma...@Fujitsu-Siemens.com> | Fujitsu Siemens
http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/imprint.html | 81730 Munich, Germany
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Guenter Knauf <fu...@apache.org>.
> I am calling for a release VOTE on the above releases of
> Apache HTTP Server (1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8).
> Pre-release tarballs of Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63
+1 1.3.41 on NetWare (NOTICE and NetWare copyright were not updated; I've fixed these in SVN now).
+1 2.0.63 on NetWare
+1 2.2.8 on NetWare
all build fine and work; tested the 2.x also with SVN 1.4.6 and PHP 5.2.5 and found no issues so far.
Guenter.
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Nick Kew wrote:
>
> 2.0.62: +1 on Linux. 2.0.63 not tested, but the changes
> are negligible, aren't they?
svn diff --notice-ancestry \
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.0.62 \
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.0.63
although diffing the tarballs is really what you want to do.
Unfortunately, a +1 for .62 doesn't help :)
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Giuliano Gavazzi <de...@humph.com>.
On 14 Jan 2008, at 22:57, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:58:53 -0500
> Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>
>> I am keeping voting open, simply because we don't have a
>> lot of votes currently... PMC members especially, please
>> download, test and vote.
>
> 2.2.8: Linux clear +1, MacOSX tentative +1
which MacOSX? Tried compiling on 10.5.1 but the result does not work.
Apart from the long standing problem of a missing -lz when deflate is
enabled (-lz is added to the required libs according to configure, but
must be given by hand in two instances for the build process to
succeed), the resulting httpd fails when loading mod_ssl.
The _ssl_cmd_SSLCACertificateFile symbol is missing and this seems to
stem from some ranlib problems (symbols not exported). I used the apr
included in 2.2.8. No success with the one that comes with 10.5.1
either.
I am trying now to compile apr from the latest 1.2.12.
thanks
Giuliano
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Nick Kew <ni...@webthing.com>.
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:58:53 -0500
Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
> I am keeping voting open, simply because we don't have a
> lot of votes currently... PMC members especially, please
> download, test and vote.
2.2.8: Linux clear +1, MacOSX tentative +1
(tentative because my perl installation fails some tests
due to failures in the perl, not in the server).
2.0.62: +1 on Linux. 2.0.63 not tested, but the changes
are negligible, aren't they?
--
Nick Kew
Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book
http://www.apachetutor.org/
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Jan 11, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I am calling for a release VOTE on the above releases of
> Apache HTTP Server (1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8).
>
> Pre-release tarballs of Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63
> and 2.2.8 are available for download and test at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Their availability does not constitute an official release.
>
> Voting will close in 72 hours (~9am, eastern, on Monday
> Jan. 14th)
>
I am keeping voting open, simply because we don't have a
lot of votes currently... PMC members especially, please
download, test and vote.
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 01/11/2008 03:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I am calling for a release VOTE on the above releases of
> Apache HTTP Server (1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8).
>
> Pre-release tarballs of Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63
> and 2.2.8 are available for download and test at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Their availability does not constitute an official release.
>
> Voting will close in 72 hours (~9am, eastern, on Monday
> Jan. 14th)
>
>
Vote:
[+1] httpd 1.3.41
[+1] httpd 2.0.63
[+1] httpd 2.2.8
Results:
GPG signatures: OK
md5 checksums : OK
SuSE 10.2 32bit:
1.3.41:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/apache/contentlength.t 20 6 30.00% 6 10 14 16 18 20
t/apache/headers.t 24 3 12.50% 3 6 9
t/apache/pr37166.t 4 1 25.00% 4
t/modules/include.t 80 2 2.50% 29 44
(1 subtest UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 34 tests and 16 subtests skipped.
Failed 4/68 test scripts, 94.12% okay. 12/1794 subtests failed, 99.33% okay.
No regressions
2.0.63:
worker:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/modules/cgi.t 58 21 36.21% 14 16 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46-49
51-58
(1 subtest UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 14 tests and 28 subtests skipped.
Failed 1/80 test scripts, 98.75% okay. 21/2825 subtests failed, 99.26% okay.
No regressions
prefork:
All tests successful (1 subtest UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 14 tests and 28 subtests skipped.
Files=80, Tests=2825, 91 wallclock secs (45.97 cusr + 5.16 csys = 51.13 CPU)
No regressions
Litmus (WebDAV tests):
-> running `basic':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. options............... pass
3. put_get............... pass
4. put_get_utf8_segment.. pass
5. mkcol_over_plain...... pass
6. delete................ pass
7. delete_null........... pass
8. delete_fragment....... pass
9. mkcol................. pass
10. mkcol_again........... pass
11. delete_coll........... pass
12. mkcol_no_parent....... pass
13. mkcol_with_body....... pass
14. finish................ pass
<- summary for `basic': of 15 tests run: 15 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
-> running `copymove':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. copy_init............. pass
3. copy_simple........... pass
4. copy_overwrite........ pass
5. copy_nodestcoll....... WARNING: COPY to non-existant collection '/litmus/litmus/nonesuch' gave '500 Internal Server
Error' not 409
...................... pass (with 1 warning)
6. copy_cleanup.......... pass
7. copy_coll............. pass
8. copy_shallow.......... pass
9. move.................. pass
10. move_coll............. pass
11. move_cleanup.......... pass
12. finish................ pass
<- summary for `copymove': of 13 tests run: 13 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
-> 1 warning was issued.
-> running `props':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. propfind_invalid...... pass
3. propfind_invalid2..... pass
4. propfind_d0........... pass
5. propinit.............. pass
6. propset............... pass
7. propget............... pass
8. propextended.......... pass
9. propmove.............. pass
10. propget............... pass
11. propdeletes........... pass
12. propget............... pass
13. propreplace........... pass
14. propget............... pass
15. propnullns............ pass
16. propget............... pass
17. prophighunicode....... pass
18. propget............... pass
19. propremoveset......... pass
20. propget............... pass
21. propsetremove......... pass
22. propget............... pass
23. propvalnspace......... pass
24. propwformed........... pass
25. propinit.............. pass
26. propmanyns............ pass
27. propget............... pass
28. propcleanup........... pass
29. finish................ pass
<- summary for `props': of 30 tests run: 30 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
-> running `locks':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. options............... pass
3. precond............... pass
4. init_locks............ pass
5. put................... pass
6. lock_excl............. pass
7. discover.............. pass
8. refresh............... pass
9. notowner_modify....... pass
10. notowner_lock......... pass
11. owner_modify.......... pass
12. notowner_modify....... pass
13. notowner_lock......... pass
14. copy.................. pass
15. cond_put.............. FAIL (PUT conditional on lock and etag failed: 412 Precondition Failed)
16. fail_cond_put......... pass
17. cond_put_with_not..... pass
18. cond_put_corrupt_token WARNING: PUT failed with 400 not 423
...................... pass (with 1 warning)
19. complex_cond_put...... FAIL (PUT with complex conditional failed: 412 Precondition Failed)
20. fail_complex_cond_put. pass
21. unlock................ pass
22. fail_cond_put_unlocked FAIL (conditional PUT with invalid lock-token should fail: 204 No Content)
23. lock_shared........... pass
24. notowner_modify....... pass
25. notowner_lock......... pass
26. owner_modify.......... pass
27. double_sharedlock..... pass
28. notowner_modify....... pass
29. notowner_lock......... pass
30. unlock................ pass
31. prep_collection....... pass
32. lock_collection....... pass
33. owner_modify.......... pass
34. notowner_modify....... pass
35. refresh............... pass
36. indirect_refresh...... pass
37. unlock................ pass
38. finish................ pass
<- summary for `locks': of 39 tests run: 36 passed, 3 failed. 92.3%
-> 1 warning was issued.
-> running `http':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. expect100............. pass
3. finish................ pass
<- summary for `http': of 4 tests run: 4 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
No regressions
2.2.8
worker:
All tests successful, 7 tests and 18 subtests skipped.
Files=80, Tests=2843, 137 wallclock secs (46.64 cusr + 5.17 csys = 51.81 CPU)
prefork:
All tests successful, 7 tests and 18 subtests skipped.
Files=80, Tests=2843, 108 wallclock secs (46.13 cusr + 5.60 csys = 51.73 CPU)
event:
All tests successful, 7 tests and 18 subtests skipped.
Files=80, Tests=2843, 93 wallclock secs (45.77 cusr + 5.17 csys = 50.94 CPU)
no regressions
Litmus (WebDAV tests):
-> running `basic':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. options............... pass
3. put_get............... pass
4. put_get_utf8_segment.. pass
5. mkcol_over_plain...... pass
6. delete................ pass
7. delete_null........... pass
8. delete_fragment....... pass
9. mkcol................. pass
10. mkcol_again........... pass
11. delete_coll........... pass
12. mkcol_no_parent....... pass
13. mkcol_with_body....... pass
14. finish................ pass
<- summary for `basic': of 15 tests run: 15 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
-> running `copymove':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. copy_init............. pass
3. copy_simple........... pass
4. copy_overwrite........ pass
5. copy_nodestcoll....... WARNING: COPY to non-existant collection '/litmus/litmus/nonesuch' gave '500 Internal Server
Error' not 409
...................... pass (with 1 warning)
6. copy_cleanup.......... pass
7. copy_coll............. pass
8. copy_shallow.......... pass
9. move.................. pass
10. move_coll............. pass
11. move_cleanup.......... pass
12. finish................ pass
<- summary for `copymove': of 13 tests run: 13 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
-> 1 warning was issued.
-> running `props':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. propfind_invalid...... pass
3. propfind_invalid2..... pass
4. propfind_d0........... pass
5. propinit.............. pass
6. propset............... pass
7. propget............... pass
8. propextended.......... pass
9. propmove.............. pass
10. propget............... pass
11. propdeletes........... pass
12. propget............... pass
13. propreplace........... pass
14. propget............... pass
15. propnullns............ pass
16. propget............... pass
17. prophighunicode....... pass
18. propget............... pass
19. propremoveset......... pass
20. propget............... pass
21. propsetremove......... pass
22. propget............... pass
23. propvalnspace......... pass
24. propwformed........... pass
25. propinit.............. pass
26. propmanyns............ pass
27. propget............... pass
28. propcleanup........... pass
29. finish................ pass
<- summary for `props': of 30 tests run: 30 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
-> running `locks':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. options............... pass
3. precond............... pass
4. init_locks............ pass
5. put................... pass
6. lock_excl............. pass
7. discover.............. pass
8. refresh............... pass
9. notowner_modify....... pass
10. notowner_lock......... pass
11. owner_modify.......... pass
12. notowner_modify....... pass
13. notowner_lock......... pass
14. copy.................. pass
15. cond_put.............. pass
16. fail_cond_put......... pass
17. cond_put_with_not..... pass
18. cond_put_corrupt_token WARNING: PUT failed with 400 not 423
...................... pass (with 1 warning)
19. complex_cond_put...... pass
20. fail_complex_cond_put. pass
21. unlock................ pass
22. fail_cond_put_unlocked pass
23. lock_shared........... pass
24. notowner_modify....... pass
25. notowner_lock......... pass
26. owner_modify.......... pass
27. double_sharedlock..... pass
28. notowner_modify....... pass
29. notowner_lock......... pass
30. unlock................ pass
31. prep_collection....... pass
32. lock_collection....... pass
33. owner_modify.......... pass
34. notowner_modify....... pass
35. refresh............... pass
36. indirect_refresh...... pass
37. unlock................ pass
38. finish................ pass
<- summary for `locks': of 39 tests run: 39 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
-> 1 warning was issued.
-> running `http':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. expect100............. pass
3. finish................ pass
<- summary for `http': of 4 tests run: 4 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
no regressions
SuSE 10.1 64bit:
2.2.8 (worker):
All tests successful, 7 tests and 18 subtests skipped.
Files=80, Tests=2841, 83 wallclock secs (33.49 cusr + 6.67 csys = 40.16 CPU)
No regressions
2.0.63 (worker):
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/modules/cgi.t 58 21 36.21% 14 16 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46-49
51-58
(1 subtest UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 14 tests and 28 subtests skipped.
Failed 1/80 test scripts, 98.75% okay. 21/2823 subtests failed, 99.26% okay.
No regressions
On Solaris my test kits are not complete, therefore I do not add any results.
Solaris 8:
2.0.63 (worker):
No test kit, but compiles and starts fine.
2.2.8 (worker):
No test kit, but compiles and starts fine.
Solaris 9:
2.0.63 (worker):
No regressions found.
2.2.8 (worker):
No regressions found.
Solaris 10:
2.0.63 (worker):
No regressions found.
2.2.8 (worker):
No regressions found.
Vote:
[+1] httpd 1.3.41
[+1] httpd 2.0.63
[+1] httpd 2.2.8
Results:
GPG signatures: OK
md5 checksums : OK
SuSE 10.2 32bit:
1.3.41:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/apache/contentlength.t 20 6 30.00% 6 10 14 16 18 20
t/apache/headers.t 24 3 12.50% 3 6 9
t/apache/pr37166.t 4 1 25.00% 4
t/modules/include.t 80 2 2.50% 29 44
(1 subtest UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 34 tests and 16 subtests skipped.
Failed 4/68 test scripts, 94.12% okay. 12/1794 subtests failed, 99.33% okay.
No regressions
2.0.63:
worker:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/modules/cgi.t 58 21 36.21% 14 16 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46-49
51-58
(1 subtest UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 14 tests and 28 subtests skipped.
Failed 1/80 test scripts, 98.75% okay. 21/2825 subtests failed, 99.26% okay.
No regressions
prefork:
All tests successful (1 subtest UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 14 tests and 28 subtests skipped.
Files=80, Tests=2825, 91 wallclock secs (45.97 cusr + 5.16 csys = 51.13 CPU)
No regressions
Litmus (WebDAV tests):
-> running `basic':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. options............... pass
3. put_get............... pass
4. put_get_utf8_segment.. pass
5. mkcol_over_plain...... pass
6. delete................ pass
7. delete_null........... pass
8. delete_fragment....... pass
9. mkcol................. pass
10. mkcol_again........... pass
11. delete_coll........... pass
12. mkcol_no_parent....... pass
13. mkcol_with_body....... pass
14. finish................ pass
<- summary for `basic': of 15 tests run: 15 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
-> running `copymove':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. copy_init............. pass
3. copy_simple........... pass
4. copy_overwrite........ pass
5. copy_nodestcoll....... WARNING: COPY to non-existant collection '/litmus/litmus/nonesuch' gave '500 Internal Server
Error' not 409
...................... pass (with 1 warning)
6. copy_cleanup.......... pass
7. copy_coll............. pass
8. copy_shallow.......... pass
9. move.................. pass
10. move_coll............. pass
11. move_cleanup.......... pass
12. finish................ pass
<- summary for `copymove': of 13 tests run: 13 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
-> 1 warning was issued.
-> running `props':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. propfind_invalid...... pass
3. propfind_invalid2..... pass
4. propfind_d0........... pass
5. propinit.............. pass
6. propset............... pass
7. propget............... pass
8. propextended.......... pass
9. propmove.............. pass
10. propget............... pass
11. propdeletes........... pass
12. propget............... pass
13. propreplace........... pass
14. propget............... pass
15. propnullns............ pass
16. propget............... pass
17. prophighunicode....... pass
18. propget............... pass
19. propremoveset......... pass
20. propget............... pass
21. propsetremove......... pass
22. propget............... pass
23. propvalnspace......... pass
24. propwformed........... pass
25. propinit.............. pass
26. propmanyns............ pass
27. propget............... pass
28. propcleanup........... pass
29. finish................ pass
<- summary for `props': of 30 tests run: 30 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
-> running `locks':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. options............... pass
3. precond............... pass
4. init_locks............ pass
5. put................... pass
6. lock_excl............. pass
7. discover.............. pass
8. refresh............... pass
9. notowner_modify....... pass
10. notowner_lock......... pass
11. owner_modify.......... pass
12. notowner_modify....... pass
13. notowner_lock......... pass
14. copy.................. pass
15. cond_put.............. FAIL (PUT conditional on lock and etag failed: 412 Precondition Failed)
16. fail_cond_put......... pass
17. cond_put_with_not..... pass
18. cond_put_corrupt_token WARNING: PUT failed with 400 not 423
...................... pass (with 1 warning)
19. complex_cond_put...... FAIL (PUT with complex conditional failed: 412 Precondition Failed)
20. fail_complex_cond_put. pass
21. unlock................ pass
22. fail_cond_put_unlocked FAIL (conditional PUT with invalid lock-token should fail: 204 No Content)
23. lock_shared........... pass
24. notowner_modify....... pass
25. notowner_lock......... pass
26. owner_modify.......... pass
27. double_sharedlock..... pass
28. notowner_modify....... pass
29. notowner_lock......... pass
30. unlock................ pass
31. prep_collection....... pass
32. lock_collection....... pass
33. owner_modify.......... pass
34. notowner_modify....... pass
35. refresh............... pass
36. indirect_refresh...... pass
37. unlock................ pass
38. finish................ pass
<- summary for `locks': of 39 tests run: 36 passed, 3 failed. 92.3%
-> 1 warning was issued.
-> running `http':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. expect100............. pass
3. finish................ pass
<- summary for `http': of 4 tests run: 4 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
No regressions
2.2.8
worker:
All tests successful, 7 tests and 18 subtests skipped.
Files=80, Tests=2843, 137 wallclock secs (46.64 cusr + 5.17 csys = 51.81 CPU)
prefork:
All tests successful, 7 tests and 18 subtests skipped.
Files=80, Tests=2843, 108 wallclock secs (46.13 cusr + 5.60 csys = 51.73 CPU)
event:
All tests successful, 7 tests and 18 subtests skipped.
Files=80, Tests=2843, 93 wallclock secs (45.77 cusr + 5.17 csys = 50.94 CPU)
no regressions
Litmus (WebDAV tests):
-> running `basic':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. options............... pass
3. put_get............... pass
4. put_get_utf8_segment.. pass
5. mkcol_over_plain...... pass
6. delete................ pass
7. delete_null........... pass
8. delete_fragment....... pass
9. mkcol................. pass
10. mkcol_again........... pass
11. delete_coll........... pass
12. mkcol_no_parent....... pass
13. mkcol_with_body....... pass
14. finish................ pass
<- summary for `basic': of 15 tests run: 15 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
-> running `copymove':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. copy_init............. pass
3. copy_simple........... pass
4. copy_overwrite........ pass
5. copy_nodestcoll....... WARNING: COPY to non-existant collection '/litmus/litmus/nonesuch' gave '500 Internal Server
Error' not 409
...................... pass (with 1 warning)
6. copy_cleanup.......... pass
7. copy_coll............. pass
8. copy_shallow.......... pass
9. move.................. pass
10. move_coll............. pass
11. move_cleanup.......... pass
12. finish................ pass
<- summary for `copymove': of 13 tests run: 13 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
-> 1 warning was issued.
-> running `props':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. propfind_invalid...... pass
3. propfind_invalid2..... pass
4. propfind_d0........... pass
5. propinit.............. pass
6. propset............... pass
7. propget............... pass
8. propextended.......... pass
9. propmove.............. pass
10. propget............... pass
11. propdeletes........... pass
12. propget............... pass
13. propreplace........... pass
14. propget............... pass
15. propnullns............ pass
16. propget............... pass
17. prophighunicode....... pass
18. propget............... pass
19. propremoveset......... pass
20. propget............... pass
21. propsetremove......... pass
22. propget............... pass
23. propvalnspace......... pass
24. propwformed........... pass
25. propinit.............. pass
26. propmanyns............ pass
27. propget............... pass
28. propcleanup........... pass
29. finish................ pass
<- summary for `props': of 30 tests run: 30 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
-> running `locks':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. options............... pass
3. precond............... pass
4. init_locks............ pass
5. put................... pass
6. lock_excl............. pass
7. discover.............. pass
8. refresh............... pass
9. notowner_modify....... pass
10. notowner_lock......... pass
11. owner_modify.......... pass
12. notowner_modify....... pass
13. notowner_lock......... pass
14. copy.................. pass
15. cond_put.............. pass
16. fail_cond_put......... pass
17. cond_put_with_not..... pass
18. cond_put_corrupt_token WARNING: PUT failed with 400 not 423
...................... pass (with 1 warning)
19. complex_cond_put...... pass
20. fail_complex_cond_put. pass
21. unlock................ pass
22. fail_cond_put_unlocked pass
23. lock_shared........... pass
24. notowner_modify....... pass
25. notowner_lock......... pass
26. owner_modify.......... pass
27. double_sharedlock..... pass
28. notowner_modify....... pass
29. notowner_lock......... pass
30. unlock................ pass
31. prep_collection....... pass
32. lock_collection....... pass
33. owner_modify.......... pass
34. notowner_modify....... pass
35. refresh............... pass
36. indirect_refresh...... pass
37. unlock................ pass
38. finish................ pass
<- summary for `locks': of 39 tests run: 39 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
-> 1 warning was issued.
-> running `http':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. expect100............. pass
3. finish................ pass
<- summary for `http': of 4 tests run: 4 passed, 0 failed. 100.0%
no regressions
SuSE 10.1 64bit:
2.2.8 (worker):
All tests successful, 7 tests and 18 subtests skipped.
Files=80, Tests=2841, 83 wallclock secs (33.49 cusr + 6.67 csys = 40.16 CPU)
No regressions
2.0.63 (worker):
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/modules/cgi.t 58 21 36.21% 14 16 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46-49
51-58
(1 subtest UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 14 tests and 28 subtests skipped.
Failed 1/80 test scripts, 98.75% okay. 21/2823 subtests failed, 99.26% okay.
No regressions
On Solaris my test kits are not complete, therefore I do not add any results.
Solaris 8:
2.0.63 (worker):
No test kit, but compiles and starts fine.
2.2.8 (worker):
No test kit, but compiles and starts fine.
Solaris 9:
2.0.63 (worker):
No regressions found.
2.2.8 (worker):
No regressions found.
Solaris 10:
2.0.63 (worker):
No regressions found.
2.2.8 (worker):
No regressions found.
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Jan 11, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I am calling for a release VOTE on the above releases of
> Apache HTTP Server (1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8).
>
> Pre-release tarballs of Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63
> and 2.2.8 are available for download and test at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Their availability does not constitute an official release.
>
> Voting will close in 72 hours (~9am, eastern, on Monday
> Jan. 14th)
>
I am keeping voting open, simply because we don't have a
lot of votes currently... PMC members especially, please
download, test and vote.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: testers-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: testers-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Brad Nicholes <BN...@novell.com>.
>>> On 1/11/2008 at 7:09 AM, in message
<0F...@jaguNET.com>, Jim Jagielski
<ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
> I am calling for a release VOTE on the above releases of
> Apache HTTP Server (1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8).
>
> Pre-release tarballs of Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63
> and 2.2.8 are available for download and test at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Their availability does not constitute an official release.
>
> Voting will close in 72 hours (~9am, eastern, on Monday
> Jan. 14th)
+1 1.3.41, 2.0.63, 2.2.8 NetWare
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: testers-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: testers-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Jan 11, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I am calling for a release VOTE on the above releases of
> Apache HTTP Server (1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8).
>
> Pre-release tarballs of Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63
> and 2.2.8 are available for download and test at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Their availability does not constitute an official release.
>
> Voting will close in 72 hours (~9am, eastern, on Monday
> Jan. 14th)
>
[+1] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41
[+1] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.63
[+1] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: testers-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: testers-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Brad Nicholes <BN...@novell.com>.
>>> On 1/11/2008 at 7:09 AM, in message
<0F...@jaguNET.com>, Jim Jagielski
<ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
> I am calling for a release VOTE on the above releases of
> Apache HTTP Server (1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8).
>
> Pre-release tarballs of Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63
> and 2.2.8 are available for download and test at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Their availability does not constitute an official release.
>
> Voting will close in 72 hours (~9am, eastern, on Monday
> Jan. 14th)
+1 1.3.41, 2.0.63, 2.2.8 NetWare
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Sander Temme <sc...@apache.org>.
On Jan 14, 2008, at 3:20 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>> -1 1.3.41 (compiles, but default layout on Darwin doesn't respect
>>> prefix)
It never has. There's absolute paths in the layout file.
>> Hrm... Roy, is this a regression from 1.3.39?
>
> No, so never mind. +1 on 1.3.41 -- I was finally able to get it
> to work after adding --with-layout=Apache and manual configuration.
> The server seems to be working fine.
--with-layout=Apache does the trick for me.
>
> I have not been able to get the perl test framework to run on 1.3.
Here's my saved config.status for Apache 1.3, invoked with --prefix
for a particular compile:
./configure \
"--with-layout=Apache" \
"--enable-module=so" \
"--enable-module=rewrite" \
"--enable-module=vhost_alias" \
"--enable-module=proxy" \
"--enable-module=info" \
"--enable-module=status" \
"$@"
This runs the test suite as well as possible. No SSL, because it
doesn't come with the server. No DAV for the same reason. A bunch of
tests fail, but no regressions from one version to the other. .
S.
--
Sander Temme
sctemme@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>.
On Jan 14, 2008, at 8:57 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2008, at 11:54 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> On Jan 11, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> I am calling for a release VOTE on the above releases of
>>> Apache HTTP Server (1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8).
>>
>> +1 2.2.8 (Darwin 8.11.0; powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.1)
>> +1 2.0.63 (with a few warning messages)
>> -1 1.3.41 (compiles, but default layout on Darwin doesn't respect
>> prefix)
>
> Hrm... Roy, is this a regression from 1.3.39?
No, so never mind. +1 on 1.3.41 -- I was finally able to get it
to work after adding --with-layout=Apache and manual configuration.
The server seems to be working fine.
I have not been able to get the perl test framework to run on 1.3.
....Roy
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Jan 13, 2008, at 11:54 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> I am calling for a release VOTE on the above releases of
>> Apache HTTP Server (1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8).
>
> +1 2.2.8 (Darwin 8.11.0; powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.1)
> +1 2.0.63 (with a few warning messages)
> -1 1.3.41 (compiles, but default layout on Darwin doesn't respect
> prefix)
Hrm... Roy, is this a regression from 1.3.39?
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8
Posted by "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>.
On Jan 11, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I am calling for a release VOTE on the above releases of
> Apache HTTP Server (1.3.41, 2.0.63 and 2.2.8).
+1 2.2.8 (Darwin 8.11.0; powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.1)
+1 2.0.63 (with a few warning messages)
-1 1.3.41 (compiles, but default layout on Darwin doesn't respect
prefix)
....Roy