You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by Srinath Perera <he...@gmail.com> on 2005/06/03 08:39:50 UTC
Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
Hi Venkat;
Regarding the SAAJ and infoset support, what is the state of them?
Can we move them to main source?
Thanks
Srinath
On 5/31/05, Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from me, but i suggest we also add the following to the list :-)
>
> 1. SAAJ support (will check in updates soon, related to recent changes in
> OM).
> 2. Improved Infoset support (handling for comments, PI and a test case for
> W3C XML conformance test suite).
>
> Currently SAAJ impl uses OM directly, but will switch to using DOM once we
> have the DOM layer.
>
> -- venkat
>
>
>
> On 5/31/05, Deepal Jayasinghe <de...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > Hi all;
> > here is my +1 for M2 realse
> >
> >
> > Deepal
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Chathura Herath" < chathura@opensource.lk>
> > To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:06 AM
> > Subject: RE: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> >
> >
> > > +1
> > > Chathura
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
> > > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 6:09 PM
> > > To: Srinath Perera
> > > Cc: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > >
> > > +1!
> > >
> > > Sanjiva.
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 11:08 +0600, Srinath Perera wrote:
> > >> Hi All;
> > >> Axis2 had lot of progress lately and most of the
> > >> changes decided in the Axis2 F2F has Incorporated,
> > >> I think now it is good time to move on.
> > >>
> > >> I like to purpose a M2 release on July 7 th, following is the purposed
> > >> improvements to the M2 from M1.
> > >>
> > >> 1) implementing the Contexts - laying out a hierarchy to handle the
> > > information
> > >> 2) implementing the Module Architecture
> > >> 3) implementing the support for real Async that happens over the two
> > >> channel, this complete the support for MEPs
> > >> In-Only MEP
> > >> In-Out
> > >> * Sync/ One Channel
> > >> * Async/One Channel
> > >> * Sync/ two Channel
> > >> * Async/two Channel
> > >> 4) Client API support for #3
> > >> 5) WSDL code generation without data binding
> > >> 6) implementing the Addressing Module
> > >> 7) TCP/HTTP transport support (we might be able to get the SMTP up as
> > > well)
> > >> 8) REST Support
> > >> 9) MTOM Support
> > >> 10) Admin Web App
> > >> 11) WSDL2WS, eclipe Plugin/Command line version
> > >> 12) Service Archive Wizard
> > >> 13) Module Archive Wizard
> > >> 14) Samples
> > >>
> > >> Here is My +1
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> Srinath
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
Posted by Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com>.
>
> Can we have test cases under o.a.a.om.infoset.* ?
>
Sure. No issues. To be explicit, it goes into
java\modules\xml\test\org\apache\axis\om\infoset
- venkat
RE: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
Posted by Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk>.
>
> Srinath,
>
> Is it June or July :-) your first mail says July.
>
> SAAJ:
> We're going to check in the code support today alongwith its maven
> files. It only depends on OM. No DOM implementation is required. There
> are no other dependencies. SAAJ code should go into java/modules/SAAJ.
> We are porting Axis 1.2. SAAJ test cases to 2.0, This is work in
> progress, and i dont think we can port all test cases by June 7th.
>
> Infoset support:
> The code is a mix of patches to existing code and a new testcase
> alongwith a set of xml test suite. The testcase will go into
> java\modules\xml\test\org\apache\axis\infoset. There are no external
> dependencies.
Can we have test cases under o.a.a.om.infoset.* ?
>
> Currently testing everything one more time. I don't see any major
> issues. The code has documentation enough for javadocs. Do you think
> we can add a wiki page SAAJ and infoset support?
+1. Can you update the OM Tutorial found under xdocs as well, to mention
something about full infoset support.
-- Chinthaka
>
> - venkat
>
>
> On 6/3/05, Srinath Perera <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Venkat,All;
> >
> > Please checked in the code, I will bring them to main tree
> >
> > 1) Where should the code go? new module?
> > 2) What are the dpedndancies?
> > I like to not to waver the deadline for M2 June 7th, can we get the
> > things in safe and sound by the day? I think the code need bit
> > documetations + testcases
> >
> > Please let me know the details, I will help as the time permits
> > Thanks
> > Srinath
> >
> > On 6/3/05, Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Srinath,
> > >
> > > The SAAJ code is ready. Ashu or I will check it in into scratch area
> > > today, so that you can move it to main src on Monday.
> > >
> > > Regarding the full info set support: We have support for comments and
> > > PIs fully and provided a test case for running XML test suite against
> > > OM. DTD support is currently limited to wrapping the DTD content into
> > > a OMNode. It is not parsed into object model or used to validate the
> > > document. We might implement this later, but right now this is not the
> > > priority for us.
> > >
> > > What kind of tutorial do you have in mind for infoset support? May be
> > > we can add a test case that shows OM can handle comments, PIs and DTDs
> > > ?
> > >
> > > - Venkat
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/3/05, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > > > Plus, I think we are shipping full infoset support of OM also with
> M2.
> > > >
> > > > If yes, can we have the code, test cases committed to the main tree.
> And
> > > > please some one update the OMTutorial on full infoset support. I
> will
> > > > update the rest of the OM code in the tutorial.
> > > >
> > > > -- Chinthaka
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Srinath Perera [mailto:hemapani@gmail.com]
> > > > > Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 12:40 PM
> > > > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Venkat Reddy
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Venkat;
> > > > >
> > > > > Regarding the SAAJ and infoset support, what is the state of them?
> > > > > Can we move them to main source?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Srinath
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/31/05, Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > +1 from me, but i suggest we also add the following to the list
> :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. SAAJ support (will check in updates soon, related to recent
> changes
> > > > > in
> > > > > > OM).
> > > > > > 2. Improved Infoset support (handling for comments, PI and a
> test case
> > > > > for
> > > > > > W3C XML conformance test suite).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Currently SAAJ impl uses OM directly, but will switch to using
> DOM once
> > > > > we
> > > > > > have the DOM layer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- venkat
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/31/05, Deepal Jayasinghe <de...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi all;
> > > > > > > here is my +1 for M2 realse
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Deepal
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "Chathura Herath" < chathura@opensource.lk>
> > > > > > > To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:06 AM
> > > > > > > Subject: RE: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > Chathura
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
> > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 6:09 PM
> > > > > > > > To: Srinath Perera
> > > > > > > > Cc: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sanjiva.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 11:08 +0600, Srinath Perera wrote:
> > > > > > > >> Hi All;
> > > > > > > >> Axis2 had lot of progress lately and most of the
> > > > > > > >> changes decided in the Axis2 F2F has Incorporated,
> > > > > > > >> I think now it is good time to move on.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I like to purpose a M2 release on July 7 th, following is
> the
> > > > > purposed
> > > > > > > >> improvements to the M2 from M1.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> 1) implementing the Contexts - laying out a hierarchy to
> handle the
> > > > > > > > information
> > > > > > > >> 2) implementing the Module Architecture
> > > > > > > >> 3) implementing the support for real Async that happens
> over the
> > > > > two
> > > > > > > >> channel, this complete the support for MEPs
> > > > > > > >> In-Only MEP
> > > > > > > >> In-Out
> > > > > > > >> * Sync/ One Channel
> > > > > > > >> * Async/One Channel
> > > > > > > >> * Sync/ two Channel
> > > > > > > >> * Async/two Channel
> > > > > > > >> 4) Client API support for #3
> > > > > > > >> 5) WSDL code generation without data binding
> > > > > > > >> 6) implementing the Addressing Module
> > > > > > > >> 7) TCP/HTTP transport support (we might be able to get the
> SMTP up
> > > > > as
> > > > > > > > well)
> > > > > > > >> 8) REST Support
> > > > > > > >> 9) MTOM Support
> > > > > > > >> 10) Admin Web App
> > > > > > > >> 11) WSDL2WS, eclipe Plugin/Command line version
> > > > > > > >> 12) Service Archive Wizard
> > > > > > > >> 13) Module Archive Wizard
> > > > > > > >> 14) Samples
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Here is My +1
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thanks
> > > > > > > >> Srinath
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
Posted by Srinath Perera <he...@gmail.com>.
> I like to freeze the code ASAP, let's freeze it once you are done
> What is the plan Venkat? ..
> 1)saaj things u can checked in directly ..
> 2) things goes in to xml ..can u checking them in too? do you need help?
> Thanks
> Srinath
Venkat what is the state of the code SAAJ and XML infoset support ? we
should do the integration *now* ... what is the plan? can u integrate
them or should I try?
Thanks
Srinath
Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
Posted by Srinath Perera <he...@gmail.com>.
Oops it is June Absolutly
On 6/3/05, Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Srinath,
>
> Is it June or July :-) your first mail says July.
> SAAJ:
> We're going to check in the code support today alongwith its maven
> files. It only depends on OM. No DOM implementation is required. There
> are no other dependencies. SAAJ code should go into java/modules/SAAJ.
> We are porting Axis 1.2. SAAJ test cases to 2.0, This is work in
> progress, and i dont think we can port all test cases by June 7th.
+1 for check it in .. include whatever the testcases working now. rest
we will check in after M2
lets make module modules/saaj rather than modules/SAAJ
> Infoset support:
> The code is a mix of patches to existing code and a new testcase
> alongwith a set of xml test suite. The testcase will go into
> java\modules\xml\test\org\apache\axis\infoset. There are no external
> dependencies.
+1 to checkd them in, OMers . any isuues?
> Currently testing everything one more time. I don't see any major
> issues. The code has documentation enough for javadocs. Do you think
> we can add a wiki page SAAJ and infoset support?
Yes please at a wiki page, if possible let us add a small chapter in
to user guide if we can make it.
I like to freeze the code ASAP, let's freeze it once you are done
What is the plan Venkat? ..
1)saaj things u can checked in directly ..
2) things goes in to xml ..can u checking them in too? do you need help?
Thanks
Srinath
> - venkat
>
>
> On 6/3/05, Srinath Perera <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Venkat,All;
> >
> > Please checked in the code, I will bring them to main tree
> >
> > 1) Where should the code go? new module?
> > 2) What are the dpedndancies?
> > I like to not to waver the deadline for M2 June 7th, can we get the
> > things in safe and sound by the day? I think the code need bit
> > documetations + testcases
> >
> > Please let me know the details, I will help as the time permits
> > Thanks
> > Srinath
> >
> > On 6/3/05, Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Srinath,
> > >
> > > The SAAJ code is ready. Ashu or I will check it in into scratch area
> > > today, so that you can move it to main src on Monday.
> > >
> > > Regarding the full info set support: We have support for comments and
> > > PIs fully and provided a test case for running XML test suite against
> > > OM. DTD support is currently limited to wrapping the DTD content into
> > > a OMNode. It is not parsed into object model or used to validate the
> > > document. We might implement this later, but right now this is not the
> > > priority for us.
> > >
> > > What kind of tutorial do you have in mind for infoset support? May be
> > > we can add a test case that shows OM can handle comments, PIs and DTDs
> > > ?
> > >
> > > - Venkat
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/3/05, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > > > Plus, I think we are shipping full infoset support of OM also with M2.
> > > >
> > > > If yes, can we have the code, test cases committed to the main tree. And
> > > > please some one update the OMTutorial on full infoset support. I will
> > > > update the rest of the OM code in the tutorial.
> > > >
> > > > -- Chinthaka
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Srinath Perera [mailto:hemapani@gmail.com]
> > > > > Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 12:40 PM
> > > > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Venkat Reddy
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Venkat;
> > > > >
> > > > > Regarding the SAAJ and infoset support, what is the state of them?
> > > > > Can we move them to main source?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Srinath
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/31/05, Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > +1 from me, but i suggest we also add the following to the list :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. SAAJ support (will check in updates soon, related to recent changes
> > > > > in
> > > > > > OM).
> > > > > > 2. Improved Infoset support (handling for comments, PI and a test case
> > > > > for
> > > > > > W3C XML conformance test suite).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Currently SAAJ impl uses OM directly, but will switch to using DOM once
> > > > > we
> > > > > > have the DOM layer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- venkat
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/31/05, Deepal Jayasinghe <de...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi all;
> > > > > > > here is my +1 for M2 realse
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Deepal
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "Chathura Herath" < chathura@opensource.lk>
> > > > > > > To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:06 AM
> > > > > > > Subject: RE: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > Chathura
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
> > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 6:09 PM
> > > > > > > > To: Srinath Perera
> > > > > > > > Cc: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sanjiva.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 11:08 +0600, Srinath Perera wrote:
> > > > > > > >> Hi All;
> > > > > > > >> Axis2 had lot of progress lately and most of the
> > > > > > > >> changes decided in the Axis2 F2F has Incorporated,
> > > > > > > >> I think now it is good time to move on.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I like to purpose a M2 release on July 7 th, following is the
> > > > > purposed
> > > > > > > >> improvements to the M2 from M1.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> 1) implementing the Contexts - laying out a hierarchy to handle the
> > > > > > > > information
> > > > > > > >> 2) implementing the Module Architecture
> > > > > > > >> 3) implementing the support for real Async that happens over the
> > > > > two
> > > > > > > >> channel, this complete the support for MEPs
> > > > > > > >> In-Only MEP
> > > > > > > >> In-Out
> > > > > > > >> * Sync/ One Channel
> > > > > > > >> * Async/One Channel
> > > > > > > >> * Sync/ two Channel
> > > > > > > >> * Async/two Channel
> > > > > > > >> 4) Client API support for #3
> > > > > > > >> 5) WSDL code generation without data binding
> > > > > > > >> 6) implementing the Addressing Module
> > > > > > > >> 7) TCP/HTTP transport support (we might be able to get the SMTP up
> > > > > as
> > > > > > > > well)
> > > > > > > >> 8) REST Support
> > > > > > > >> 9) MTOM Support
> > > > > > > >> 10) Admin Web App
> > > > > > > >> 11) WSDL2WS, eclipe Plugin/Command line version
> > > > > > > >> 12) Service Archive Wizard
> > > > > > > >> 13) Module Archive Wizard
> > > > > > > >> 14) Samples
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Here is My +1
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thanks
> > > > > > > >> Srinath
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
Posted by Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com>.
Srinath,
Is it June or July :-) your first mail says July.
SAAJ:
We're going to check in the code support today alongwith its maven
files. It only depends on OM. No DOM implementation is required. There
are no other dependencies. SAAJ code should go into java/modules/SAAJ.
We are porting Axis 1.2. SAAJ test cases to 2.0, This is work in
progress, and i dont think we can port all test cases by June 7th.
Infoset support:
The code is a mix of patches to existing code and a new testcase
alongwith a set of xml test suite. The testcase will go into
java\modules\xml\test\org\apache\axis\infoset. There are no external
dependencies.
Currently testing everything one more time. I don't see any major
issues. The code has documentation enough for javadocs. Do you think
we can add a wiki page SAAJ and infoset support?
- venkat
On 6/3/05, Srinath Perera <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Venkat,All;
>
> Please checked in the code, I will bring them to main tree
>
> 1) Where should the code go? new module?
> 2) What are the dpedndancies?
> I like to not to waver the deadline for M2 June 7th, can we get the
> things in safe and sound by the day? I think the code need bit
> documetations + testcases
>
> Please let me know the details, I will help as the time permits
> Thanks
> Srinath
>
> On 6/3/05, Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Srinath,
> >
> > The SAAJ code is ready. Ashu or I will check it in into scratch area
> > today, so that you can move it to main src on Monday.
> >
> > Regarding the full info set support: We have support for comments and
> > PIs fully and provided a test case for running XML test suite against
> > OM. DTD support is currently limited to wrapping the DTD content into
> > a OMNode. It is not parsed into object model or used to validate the
> > document. We might implement this later, but right now this is not the
> > priority for us.
> >
> > What kind of tutorial do you have in mind for infoset support? May be
> > we can add a test case that shows OM can handle comments, PIs and DTDs
> > ?
> >
> > - Venkat
> >
> >
> > On 6/3/05, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > > Plus, I think we are shipping full infoset support of OM also with M2.
> > >
> > > If yes, can we have the code, test cases committed to the main tree. And
> > > please some one update the OMTutorial on full infoset support. I will
> > > update the rest of the OM code in the tutorial.
> > >
> > > -- Chinthaka
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Srinath Perera [mailto:hemapani@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 12:40 PM
> > > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Venkat Reddy
> > > > Subject: Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > > >
> > > > Hi Venkat;
> > > >
> > > > Regarding the SAAJ and infoset support, what is the state of them?
> > > > Can we move them to main source?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Srinath
> > > >
> > > > On 5/31/05, Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > +1 from me, but i suggest we also add the following to the list :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. SAAJ support (will check in updates soon, related to recent changes
> > > > in
> > > > > OM).
> > > > > 2. Improved Infoset support (handling for comments, PI and a test case
> > > > for
> > > > > W3C XML conformance test suite).
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently SAAJ impl uses OM directly, but will switch to using DOM once
> > > > we
> > > > > have the DOM layer.
> > > > >
> > > > > -- venkat
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/31/05, Deepal Jayasinghe <de...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi all;
> > > > > > here is my +1 for M2 realse
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Deepal
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "Chathura Herath" < chathura@opensource.lk>
> > > > > > To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:06 AM
> > > > > > Subject: RE: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > Chathura
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 6:09 PM
> > > > > > > To: Srinath Perera
> > > > > > > Cc: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sanjiva.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 11:08 +0600, Srinath Perera wrote:
> > > > > > >> Hi All;
> > > > > > >> Axis2 had lot of progress lately and most of the
> > > > > > >> changes decided in the Axis2 F2F has Incorporated,
> > > > > > >> I think now it is good time to move on.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I like to purpose a M2 release on July 7 th, following is the
> > > > purposed
> > > > > > >> improvements to the M2 from M1.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> 1) implementing the Contexts - laying out a hierarchy to handle the
> > > > > > > information
> > > > > > >> 2) implementing the Module Architecture
> > > > > > >> 3) implementing the support for real Async that happens over the
> > > > two
> > > > > > >> channel, this complete the support for MEPs
> > > > > > >> In-Only MEP
> > > > > > >> In-Out
> > > > > > >> * Sync/ One Channel
> > > > > > >> * Async/One Channel
> > > > > > >> * Sync/ two Channel
> > > > > > >> * Async/two Channel
> > > > > > >> 4) Client API support for #3
> > > > > > >> 5) WSDL code generation without data binding
> > > > > > >> 6) implementing the Addressing Module
> > > > > > >> 7) TCP/HTTP transport support (we might be able to get the SMTP up
> > > > as
> > > > > > > well)
> > > > > > >> 8) REST Support
> > > > > > >> 9) MTOM Support
> > > > > > >> 10) Admin Web App
> > > > > > >> 11) WSDL2WS, eclipe Plugin/Command line version
> > > > > > >> 12) Service Archive Wizard
> > > > > > >> 13) Module Archive Wizard
> > > > > > >> 14) Samples
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Here is My +1
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks
> > > > > > >> Srinath
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
Posted by Srinath Perera <he...@gmail.com>.
Hi Venkat,All;
Please checked in the code, I will bring them to main tree
1) Where should the code go? new module?
2) What are the dpedndancies?
I like to not to waver the deadline for M2 June 7th, can we get the
things in safe and sound by the day? I think the code need bit
documetations + testcases
Please let me know the details, I will help as the time permits
Thanks
Srinath
On 6/3/05, Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Srinath,
>
> The SAAJ code is ready. Ashu or I will check it in into scratch area
> today, so that you can move it to main src on Monday.
>
> Regarding the full info set support: We have support for comments and
> PIs fully and provided a test case for running XML test suite against
> OM. DTD support is currently limited to wrapping the DTD content into
> a OMNode. It is not parsed into object model or used to validate the
> document. We might implement this later, but right now this is not the
> priority for us.
>
> What kind of tutorial do you have in mind for infoset support? May be
> we can add a test case that shows OM can handle comments, PIs and DTDs
> ?
>
> - Venkat
>
>
> On 6/3/05, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > Plus, I think we are shipping full infoset support of OM also with M2.
> >
> > If yes, can we have the code, test cases committed to the main tree. And
> > please some one update the OMTutorial on full infoset support. I will
> > update the rest of the OM code in the tutorial.
> >
> > -- Chinthaka
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Srinath Perera [mailto:hemapani@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 12:40 PM
> > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Venkat Reddy
> > > Subject: Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > >
> > > Hi Venkat;
> > >
> > > Regarding the SAAJ and infoset support, what is the state of them?
> > > Can we move them to main source?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Srinath
> > >
> > > On 5/31/05, Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > +1 from me, but i suggest we also add the following to the list :-)
> > > >
> > > > 1. SAAJ support (will check in updates soon, related to recent changes
> > > in
> > > > OM).
> > > > 2. Improved Infoset support (handling for comments, PI and a test case
> > > for
> > > > W3C XML conformance test suite).
> > > >
> > > > Currently SAAJ impl uses OM directly, but will switch to using DOM once
> > > we
> > > > have the DOM layer.
> > > >
> > > > -- venkat
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/31/05, Deepal Jayasinghe <de...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > > > > Hi all;
> > > > > here is my +1 for M2 realse
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Deepal
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Chathura Herath" < chathura@opensource.lk>
> > > > > To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:06 AM
> > > > > Subject: RE: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > > Chathura
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 6:09 PM
> > > > > > To: Srinath Perera
> > > > > > Cc: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sanjiva.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 11:08 +0600, Srinath Perera wrote:
> > > > > >> Hi All;
> > > > > >> Axis2 had lot of progress lately and most of the
> > > > > >> changes decided in the Axis2 F2F has Incorporated,
> > > > > >> I think now it is good time to move on.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I like to purpose a M2 release on July 7 th, following is the
> > > purposed
> > > > > >> improvements to the M2 from M1.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> 1) implementing the Contexts - laying out a hierarchy to handle the
> > > > > > information
> > > > > >> 2) implementing the Module Architecture
> > > > > >> 3) implementing the support for real Async that happens over the
> > > two
> > > > > >> channel, this complete the support for MEPs
> > > > > >> In-Only MEP
> > > > > >> In-Out
> > > > > >> * Sync/ One Channel
> > > > > >> * Async/One Channel
> > > > > >> * Sync/ two Channel
> > > > > >> * Async/two Channel
> > > > > >> 4) Client API support for #3
> > > > > >> 5) WSDL code generation without data binding
> > > > > >> 6) implementing the Addressing Module
> > > > > >> 7) TCP/HTTP transport support (we might be able to get the SMTP up
> > > as
> > > > > > well)
> > > > > >> 8) REST Support
> > > > > >> 9) MTOM Support
> > > > > >> 10) Admin Web App
> > > > > >> 11) WSDL2WS, eclipe Plugin/Command line version
> > > > > >> 12) Service Archive Wizard
> > > > > >> 13) Module Archive Wizard
> > > > > >> 14) Samples
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Here is My +1
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks
> > > > > >> Srinath
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
Posted by Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com>.
Srinath,
The SAAJ code is ready. Ashu or I will check it in into scratch area
today, so that you can move it to main src on Monday.
Regarding the full info set support: We have support for comments and
PIs fully and provided a test case for running XML test suite against
OM. DTD support is currently limited to wrapping the DTD content into
a OMNode. It is not parsed into object model or used to validate the
document. We might implement this later, but right now this is not the
priority for us.
What kind of tutorial do you have in mind for infoset support? May be
we can add a test case that shows OM can handle comments, PIs and DTDs
?
- Venkat
On 6/3/05, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> Plus, I think we are shipping full infoset support of OM also with M2.
>
> If yes, can we have the code, test cases committed to the main tree. And
> please some one update the OMTutorial on full infoset support. I will
> update the rest of the OM code in the tutorial.
>
> -- Chinthaka
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Srinath Perera [mailto:hemapani@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 12:40 PM
> > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Venkat Reddy
> > Subject: Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> >
> > Hi Venkat;
> >
> > Regarding the SAAJ and infoset support, what is the state of them?
> > Can we move them to main source?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Srinath
> >
> > On 5/31/05, Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1 from me, but i suggest we also add the following to the list :-)
> > >
> > > 1. SAAJ support (will check in updates soon, related to recent changes
> > in
> > > OM).
> > > 2. Improved Infoset support (handling for comments, PI and a test case
> > for
> > > W3C XML conformance test suite).
> > >
> > > Currently SAAJ impl uses OM directly, but will switch to using DOM once
> > we
> > > have the DOM layer.
> > >
> > > -- venkat
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/31/05, Deepal Jayasinghe <de...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > > > Hi all;
> > > > here is my +1 for M2 realse
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Deepal
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Chathura Herath" < chathura@opensource.lk>
> > > > To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:06 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > > Chathura
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 6:09 PM
> > > > > To: Srinath Perera
> > > > > Cc: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > > > >
> > > > > +1!
> > > > >
> > > > > Sanjiva.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 11:08 +0600, Srinath Perera wrote:
> > > > >> Hi All;
> > > > >> Axis2 had lot of progress lately and most of the
> > > > >> changes decided in the Axis2 F2F has Incorporated,
> > > > >> I think now it is good time to move on.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I like to purpose a M2 release on July 7 th, following is the
> > purposed
> > > > >> improvements to the M2 from M1.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 1) implementing the Contexts - laying out a hierarchy to handle the
> > > > > information
> > > > >> 2) implementing the Module Architecture
> > > > >> 3) implementing the support for real Async that happens over the
> > two
> > > > >> channel, this complete the support for MEPs
> > > > >> In-Only MEP
> > > > >> In-Out
> > > > >> * Sync/ One Channel
> > > > >> * Async/One Channel
> > > > >> * Sync/ two Channel
> > > > >> * Async/two Channel
> > > > >> 4) Client API support for #3
> > > > >> 5) WSDL code generation without data binding
> > > > >> 6) implementing the Addressing Module
> > > > >> 7) TCP/HTTP transport support (we might be able to get the SMTP up
> > as
> > > > > well)
> > > > >> 8) REST Support
> > > > >> 9) MTOM Support
> > > > >> 10) Admin Web App
> > > > >> 11) WSDL2WS, eclipe Plugin/Command line version
> > > > >> 12) Service Archive Wizard
> > > > >> 13) Module Archive Wizard
> > > > >> 14) Samples
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Here is My +1
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks
> > > > >> Srinath
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
RE: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
Posted by Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk>.
Plus, I think we are shipping full infoset support of OM also with M2.
If yes, can we have the code, test cases committed to the main tree. And
please some one update the OMTutorial on full infoset support. I will
update the rest of the OM code in the tutorial.
-- Chinthaka
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Srinath Perera [mailto:hemapani@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 12:40 PM
> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Venkat Reddy
> Subject: Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
>
> Hi Venkat;
>
> Regarding the SAAJ and infoset support, what is the state of them?
> Can we move them to main source?
>
> Thanks
> Srinath
>
> On 5/31/05, Venkat Reddy <vr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 from me, but i suggest we also add the following to the list :-)
> >
> > 1. SAAJ support (will check in updates soon, related to recent changes
> in
> > OM).
> > 2. Improved Infoset support (handling for comments, PI and a test case
> for
> > W3C XML conformance test suite).
> >
> > Currently SAAJ impl uses OM directly, but will switch to using DOM once
> we
> > have the DOM layer.
> >
> > -- venkat
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/31/05, Deepal Jayasinghe <de...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > > Hi all;
> > > here is my +1 for M2 realse
> > >
> > >
> > > Deepal
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Chathura Herath" < chathura@opensource.lk>
> > > To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:06 AM
> > > Subject: RE: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > >
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > > Chathura
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
> > > > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 6:09 PM
> > > > To: Srinath Perera
> > > > Cc: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Axis2][VOTE]Proposal for Axis2 M2
> > > >
> > > > +1!
> > > >
> > > > Sanjiva.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 11:08 +0600, Srinath Perera wrote:
> > > >> Hi All;
> > > >> Axis2 had lot of progress lately and most of the
> > > >> changes decided in the Axis2 F2F has Incorporated,
> > > >> I think now it is good time to move on.
> > > >>
> > > >> I like to purpose a M2 release on July 7 th, following is the
> purposed
> > > >> improvements to the M2 from M1.
> > > >>
> > > >> 1) implementing the Contexts - laying out a hierarchy to handle the
> > > > information
> > > >> 2) implementing the Module Architecture
> > > >> 3) implementing the support for real Async that happens over the
> two
> > > >> channel, this complete the support for MEPs
> > > >> In-Only MEP
> > > >> In-Out
> > > >> * Sync/ One Channel
> > > >> * Async/One Channel
> > > >> * Sync/ two Channel
> > > >> * Async/two Channel
> > > >> 4) Client API support for #3
> > > >> 5) WSDL code generation without data binding
> > > >> 6) implementing the Addressing Module
> > > >> 7) TCP/HTTP transport support (we might be able to get the SMTP up
> as
> > > > well)
> > > >> 8) REST Support
> > > >> 9) MTOM Support
> > > >> 10) Admin Web App
> > > >> 11) WSDL2WS, eclipe Plugin/Command line version
> > > >> 12) Service Archive Wizard
> > > >> 13) Module Archive Wizard
> > > >> 14) Samples
> > > >>
> > > >> Here is My +1
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks
> > > >> Srinath
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >