You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucenenet.apache.org by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com> on 2012/09/29 05:41:13 UTC
[Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
Alright, it's taken us a bit longer than we expected to get this up to vote. Thanks for everyone who helped out. This vote will be open for roughly 72 hours.
+1 - Ready to roll
0 - don't care
-1 - Not ready because...
~Prescott
RE: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
Posted by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>.
This URL would help: http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/3.0.3-RC1/
Also, +1
~P
----------------------------------------
> From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> Subject: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:41:13 -0700
>
> Alright, it's taken us a bit longer than we expected to get this up to vote. Thanks for everyone who helped out. This vote will be open for roughly 72 hours.
>
> +1 - Ready to roll
> 0 - don't care
> -1 - Not ready because...
>
> ~Prescott
Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
Posted by Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com>.
My opinion may not have much weight since a) I didn't contribute to this
release and b) I didn't take time to verify this release.. but the Apache
Way is what defines our project, and the voting process is integral to
that.
That's not a very convincing vote objectively, but passing by default
should be our response to a lackluster voting response.
Since we're so far behind on delivery schedule, I say, +1 to release.
Thanks,
Troy
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> So it's been more than 72 hours, we've technically had 3 +1's (myself,
> Itamar and Simon). then Itamar to nit pick said -1 because of a minor
> solution issue (which in my opinion doesn't require us to halt the release).
>
> I'm not particularly confident in our voting record on this one - could
> anyone else chime in on the release artifacts? Should I cut a new release?
>
> Stefan, I know you're a bit busy but could you run ANT? (I think we are
> pretty safe here)
>
> ~Prescott
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
> > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> > Subject: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
> > Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:41:13 -0700
> >
> > Alright, it's taken us a bit longer than we expected to get this up to
> vote. Thanks for everyone who helped out. This vote will be open for
> roughly 72 hours.
> >
> > +1 - Ready to roll
> > 0 - don't care
> > -1 - Not ready because...
> >
> > ~Prescott
>
Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
Posted by Christopher Currens <cu...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, I've been meaning to get around to voting, but I didn't want to
do a blind vote without actually taking the time to look at the
packages and I have only now had the time to do so. The code is good,
but I can't give a positive vote yet.
-1
RAT is showing several files that are missing licenses. I'll work on
that right now and hopefully get something committed soon. Here are a
few other things I found, relating to the root text files:
CHANGES.TXT
-- Minor, but on the first line (not yet released) should be removed
from "3.0.3 trunk (not yet released)"
-- Minor, a few lines down ArgumentOurOfRangeException should be
ArgumentOutOfRangeException
README.TXT
-- Minor, we mention Lucene.NET is compiled against .NET 4.0, we
should reword that to add in .NET 3.5 as well
-- Under documentation, we are listing the 2.9.4 docs, whose API is
significantly different from 3.0.3. It is also using the old
incubator website
-- Under additional libraries, a url is pointing to the old incubator
svn repo and an old version (2.9.4)
What is the plan on uploading the documentation? Changing those lines
relies on where that documentation will be hosted.
Thanks,
Christopher
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Patric Forsgard <pa...@tasteful.se> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I haven't work with the release but have used the alpha release and run all
> our products unit-test with success result.
>
> So I will also give +1.
>
> // Patric
>
>
>
> On 5 October 2012 07:08, Simon Svensson <si...@devhost.se> wrote:
>
>> I've realized from the answers since the first attempt that I have no clue
>> about any Apache release formats. I can only vote on the general state of
>> the code and functionality. I'll give it +1 to get it out to public
>> consumption.
>>
>>
>> On 2012-10-05 05:36, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>>
>>> So it's been more than 72 hours, we've technically had 3 +1's (myself,
>>> Itamar and Simon). then Itamar to nit pick said -1 because of a minor
>>> solution issue (which in my opinion doesn't require us to halt the release).
>>>
>>> I'm not particularly confident in our voting record on this one - could
>>> anyone else chime in on the release artifacts? Should I cut a new release?
>>>
>>> Stefan, I know you're a bit busy but could you run ANT? (I think we are
>>> pretty safe here)
>>>
>>> ~Prescott
>>>
>>> ------------------------------**----------
>>>
>>>> From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
>>>> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>>>> Subject: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
>>>> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:41:13 -0700
>>>>
>>>> Alright, it's taken us a bit longer than we expected to get this up to
>>>> vote. Thanks for everyone who helped out. This vote will be open for
>>>> roughly 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> +1 - Ready to roll
>>>> 0 - don't care
>>>> -1 - Not ready because...
>>>>
>>>> ~Prescott
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
Posted by Patric Forsgard <pa...@tasteful.se>.
Hi.
I haven't work with the release but have used the alpha release and run all
our products unit-test with success result.
So I will also give +1.
// Patric
On 5 October 2012 07:08, Simon Svensson <si...@devhost.se> wrote:
> I've realized from the answers since the first attempt that I have no clue
> about any Apache release formats. I can only vote on the general state of
> the code and functionality. I'll give it +1 to get it out to public
> consumption.
>
>
> On 2012-10-05 05:36, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
>> So it's been more than 72 hours, we've technically had 3 +1's (myself,
>> Itamar and Simon). then Itamar to nit pick said -1 because of a minor
>> solution issue (which in my opinion doesn't require us to halt the release).
>>
>> I'm not particularly confident in our voting record on this one - could
>> anyone else chime in on the release artifacts? Should I cut a new release?
>>
>> Stefan, I know you're a bit busy but could you run ANT? (I think we are
>> pretty safe here)
>>
>> ~Prescott
>>
>> ------------------------------**----------
>>
>>> From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
>>> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>>> Subject: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
>>> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:41:13 -0700
>>>
>>> Alright, it's taken us a bit longer than we expected to get this up to
>>> vote. Thanks for everyone who helped out. This vote will be open for
>>> roughly 72 hours.
>>>
>>> +1 - Ready to roll
>>> 0 - don't care
>>> -1 - Not ready because...
>>>
>>> ~Prescott
>>>
>>
>
Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
Posted by Simon Svensson <si...@devhost.se>.
I've realized from the answers since the first attempt that I have no
clue about any Apache release formats. I can only vote on the general
state of the code and functionality. I'll give it +1 to get it out to
public consumption.
On 2012-10-05 05:36, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> So it's been more than 72 hours, we've technically had 3 +1's (myself, Itamar and Simon). then Itamar to nit pick said -1 because of a minor solution issue (which in my opinion doesn't require us to halt the release).
>
> I'm not particularly confident in our voting record on this one - could anyone else chime in on the release artifacts? Should I cut a new release?
>
> Stefan, I know you're a bit busy but could you run ANT? (I think we are pretty safe here)
>
> ~Prescott
>
> ----------------------------------------
>> From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
>> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
>> Subject: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
>> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:41:13 -0700
>>
>> Alright, it's taken us a bit longer than we expected to get this up to vote. Thanks for everyone who helped out. This vote will be open for roughly 72 hours.
>>
>> +1 - Ready to roll
>> 0 - don't care
>> -1 - Not ready because...
>>
>> ~Prescott
Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2012-10-05, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> Stefan, I know you're a bit busy but could you run ANT? (I think we
> are pretty safe here)
I see Christopher has run RAT by now, I also found a few files without
licenses. Personally I'd remove a few .user files from svn and the
release (and add them to svnignore) but that wouldn't be a release
blocker.
Just to double check, the (fixable) files I found lacking the license
header are
src/contrib/Analyzers/Contrib.Analyzers.csproj.user
src/contrib/DistributedSearch/LuceneMonitorSetup/LuceneMonitorSetup.vdproj
src/core/Support/Compatibility/ConcurrentDictionary.cs
src/core/Support/Compatibility/Func.cs
src/demo/Demo.Common/Demo.Common.csproj.user
Stefan
RE: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
Posted by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>.
So it's been more than 72 hours, we've technically had 3 +1's (myself, Itamar and Simon). then Itamar to nit pick said -1 because of a minor solution issue (which in my opinion doesn't require us to halt the release).
I'm not particularly confident in our voting record on this one - could anyone else chime in on the release artifacts? Should I cut a new release?
Stefan, I know you're a bit busy but could you run ANT? (I think we are pretty safe here)
~Prescott
----------------------------------------
> From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> Subject: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:41:13 -0700
>
> Alright, it's taken us a bit longer than we expected to get this up to vote. Thanks for everyone who helped out. This vote will be open for roughly 72 hours.
>
> +1 - Ready to roll
> 0 - don't care
> -1 - Not ready because...
>
> ~Prescott
Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
Posted by Simon Svensson <si...@devhost.se>.
+1, I've been using the 3.0.3 RC for some time without any problems.
On 2012-09-29 05:41, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> Alright, it's taken us a bit longer than we expected to get this up to vote. Thanks for everyone who helped out. This vote will be open for roughly 72 hours.
>
> +1 - Ready to roll
> 0 - don't care
> -1 - Not ready because...
>
> ~Prescott
Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
+1, 3.0.3 is probably even more stable than 2.9.4 at this point. RavenDB
pre-release is running on it for quite a while now without real issues.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Kieran Logan <ki...@roleconnect.com>wrote:
> 0 - stuck with 2.9.4 for the foreseeable
>
> Kieran
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
> Sent: 29 September 2012 04:41
> To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
> Subject: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
>
> Alright, it's taken us a bit longer than we expected to get this up to
> vote.
> Thanks for everyone who helped out. This vote will be open for roughly 72
> hours.
>
> +1 - Ready to roll
> 0 - don't care
> -1 - Not ready because...
>
> ~Prescott
>
>
>
RE: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
Posted by Kieran Logan <ki...@roleconnect.com>.
0 - stuck with 2.9.4 for the foreseeable
Kieran
-----Original Message-----
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]
Sent: 29 September 2012 04:41
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 Release
Alright, it's taken us a bit longer than we expected to get this up to vote.
Thanks for everyone who helped out. This vote will be open for roughly 72
hours.
+1 - Ready to roll
0 - don't care
-1 - Not ready because...
~Prescott