You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to gitbox@activemq.apache.org by "mattrpav (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/10/02 15:19:09 UTC
[PR] [NO-JIRA] Updates on JMS 3.1 and 2.0 progress [activemq-website]
mattrpav opened a new pull request, #115:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/115
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscribe@activemq.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] [NO-JIRA] Updates on JMS 3.1 and 2.0 progress [activemq-website]
Posted by "mattrpav (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
mattrpav commented on PR #115:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/115#issuecomment-1743279598
@jbertram heads up-- merging this was premature, since it references unreleased versions. I intended this PR to be staged as part of release prep.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscribe@activemq.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] [NO-JIRA] Updates on JMS 3.1 and 2.0 progress [activemq-website]
Posted by "jbertram (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
jbertram merged PR #115:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/115
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscribe@activemq.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] [NO-JIRA] Updates on JMS 3.1 and 2.0 progress [activemq-website]
Posted by "jbertram (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
jbertram commented on PR #115:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/115#issuecomment-1743345595
@mattrpav, sorry for the jumping the gun on this one. I think it was down to a miscommunication.
The de facto standard practice is to set the PR to "draft" status to ensure reviewers don't merge it. I've also seen folks put comments on the PR saying, for example, "Don't merge!" or adding a similar "label."
I reviewed and merged it with the understanding that the references to not-yet-released versions (i.e. `6.0.0` & `6.0.1`) were intentionally giving users a heads-up about what to expect in the future.
Regarding the assignee(s)...That typically just refers to the individual(s) doing the work and not the person expected to merge it. The person merging the PR should almost always be different from the person sending the PR to ensure at least one review is done.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscribe@activemq.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org